A Publisher And His Friends (Fiscle Part-4) by Samuel Smiles (essential books to read .txt) π
We Have Already Seen That Mr. Murray Had Some Correspondence With Thomas
Campbell In 1806 Respecting The Establishment Of A Monthly Magazine;
Such An Undertaking Had Long Been A Favourite Scheme Of His, And He Had
Mentioned The Subject To Many Friends At Home As Well As Abroad. When,
Therefore, Mr. Blackwood Started His Magazine, Murray Was Ready To Enter
Into His Plans, And Before Long Announced To The Public That He Had
Become Joint Proprietor And Publisher Of Blackwood's _Edinburgh
Magazine_.
Read free book Β«A Publisher And His Friends (Fiscle Part-4) by Samuel Smiles (essential books to read .txt) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Samuel Smiles
Read book online Β«A Publisher And His Friends (Fiscle Part-4) by Samuel Smiles (essential books to read .txt) πΒ». Author - Samuel Smiles
While The Work Was Passing Through The Press Lockhart Again Wrote:
_Mr. Lockhart To John Murray_.
"I Am Reading The New 'Boswell' With Great Pleasure, Though, I Think,
The Editor Is Often Wrong. A Prodigious Flood Of Light Is Thrown On The
Book Assuredly; And The Incorporation Of The 'Tour' Is A Great
Advantage. Now, Do Have A Really Good Index. That To The Former Edition
I Have Continually Found Inadequate And Faulty. The Book Is A Dictionary
Of Wisdom And Wit, And One Should Know Exactly Where To Find The _Dictum
Magistri_. Many Of Croker's Own Remarks And Little Disquisitions Will
Also Be Hereafter Among The Choicest Of _Quotabilia_."
Croker Carried Out The Work With Great Industry And Vigour, And It
Appeared In 1831. It Contained Numerous Additions, Notes, Explanations,
And Memoranda, And, As The First Attempt To Explain The Difficulties And
Enigmas Which Lapse Of Time Had Created, It May Not Unfairly Be Said To
Have Been Admirably Edited; And Though Macaulay, According To His Own
Account, "Smashed" It In The _Edinburgh_, [Footnote: The Correspondence
Chapter 26 ( Napier's "Peninsular War"--Choker's "Boswell"--"The Family Library," Etc.) Pg 122On The Subject, And The Criticism On The Work By Macaulay, Will Be Found
In The "Croker Correspondence," Vol. Ii. Pp. 24-49.] Some Fifty Thousand
Of The "Life" Have Been Sold.
It Has Been The Fashion With Certain Recent Editors Of "Boswell's
Johnson" To Depreciate Croker's Edition; But To Any One Who Has Taken
The Pains To Make Himself Familiar With That Work, And To Study The Vast
Amount Of Information There Collected, Such Criticism Cannot But Appear
Most Ungenerous. Croker Was Acquainted With, Or Sought Out, All The
Distinguished Survivors Of Dr. Johnson's Own Generation, And By His
Indefatigable Efforts Was Enabled To Add To The Results Of His Own
Literary Research, Oral Traditions And Personal Reminiscences, Which But
For Him Would Have Been Irrevocably Lost.
The Additions Of Subsequent Editors Are But Of Trifling Value Compared
With The Information Collected By Mr. Croker, And One Of His Successors
At Least Has Not Hesitated Slightly To Transpose Or Alter Many Of Mr.
Croker's Notes, And Mark Them As His Own.
Mrs. Shelley, Widow Of The Poet, On Receiving A Present Of Croker's
"Boswell," From Mr. Murray, Said:
_Mrs. Shelley To John Murray_.
"I Have Read 'Boswell's Journal' Ten Times: I Hope To Read It Many More.
It Is The Most Amusing Book In The World. Beside That, I Do Love The
Kind-Hearted, Wise, And Gentle Bear, And Think Him As Lovable And Kind A
Friend As A Profound Philosopher."
Mr. Henry Taylor Submitted His Play Of "Isaac Comnenus"--His First
Work--To Mr. Murray, In February 1827. Lockhart Was Consulted, And,
After Perusing The Play, He Wrote To Mr. Murray:
_Mr. Lockhart To John Murray_.
"There Can Be No Sort Of Doubt That This Play Is Everyway Worthy Of
Coming Out From Albemarle Street. That The Author Might Greatly Improve
It By Shortening Its Dialogue Often, And, Once At Least, Leaving Out A
Chapter 26 ( Napier's "Peninsular War"--Choker's "Boswell"--"The Family Library," Etc.) Pg 123Scene, And By Dramatizing The Scene At The Synod, Instead Of Narrating
It, I Think Sufficiently Clear: But, Probably, The Author Has Followed
His Own Course, Upon Deliberation, In All These Matters. I Am Of
Opinion, Certainly, That _No Poem_ Has Been Lately Published Of Anything
Like The Power Or Promise Of This."
Lockhart's Suggestion Was Submitted To Mr. Taylor, Who Gratefully
Acknowledged His Criticism, And Amended His Play.
Mr. Taylor Made A Very Unusual Request. He Proposed To Divide The Loss
On His Drama With The Publisher! He Wrote To Mr. Murray:
"I Have Been Pretty Well Convinced, For Some Time Past, That My Book
Will Never Sell, And, Under These Circumstances, I Cannot Think It
Proper That You Should Be The Sole Sufferer. Whenever, Therefore, You
Are Of Opinion That The Book Has Had A Fair Trial, I Beg You To
Understand That I Shall Be Ready To Divide The Loss Equally With You,
That Being, I Conceive, The Just Arrangement In The Case."
Though Mr. Lockhart Gave An Interesting Review Of "Isaac Comnenus" In
The _Quarterly_, It Still Hung Fire, And Did Not Sell. A Few Years
Later, However, Henry Taylor Showed What He Could Do, As A Poet, By His
"Philip Van Artevelde," Which Raised His Reputation To The Highest
Point. Moore, After The Publication Of This Drama, Wrote In His "Diary":
"I Breakfasted In The Morning At Rogers's, To Meet The New Poet, Mr.
Taylor, Author Of 'Philip Van Artevelde': Our Company, Besides, Being
Sydney Smith And Southey. 'Van Artevelde' Is A Tall, Handsome Young
Fellow. Conversation Chiefly About The Profits Booksellers Make Of Us
Scribblers. I Remember Peter Pindar Saying, One Of The Few Times I Ever
Met Him, That The Booksellers Drank Their Wine In The Manner Of The
Heroes In The Hall Of Odin, Out Of Authors' Skulls." This Was A Sharp
Saying; But Rogers, If He Had Chosen To Relate His Own Experiences When
He Negotiated With Mr. Murray About The Sale Of Crabbe's Works, And The
Result Of That Negotiation, Might Have Proved That The Rule Was Not Of
Universal Application.
"The Family Library" Has Already Been Mentioned. Mr. Murray Had Long
Contemplated A Serial Publication, By Means Of Which Good Literature And
Copyright Works Might Be Rendered Cheaper And Accessible To A Wider
Circle Of Readers Than They Had Hitherto Been.
The Society For The Diffusion Of Useful Knowledge Was Established In
Chapter 26 ( Napier's "Peninsular War"--Choker's "Boswell"--"The Family Library," Etc.) Pg 1241828, With Henry Brougham As Chairman. Mr. Murray Subscribed L10 To This
Society, And Agreed To Publish Their "Library Of Entertaining
Knowledge." Shortly Afterwards, However, He Withdrew From This
Undertaking, Which Was Transferred To Mr. Knight, And Reverted To His
Own Proposed Publication Of Cheap Works.
The First Volume Of "The Family Library" Appeared In April 1829. Murray
Sent A Copy To Charles Knight, Who Returned Him The First Volume Of The
"Library Of Entertaining Knowledge."
_Mr. Charles Knight To John Murray_.
"We Each Launch Our Vessels On The Same Day, And I Most Earnestly Hope
That Both Will Succeed, For Good Must Come Of That Success. We Have
Plenty Of Sea-Room And Need Never Run Foul Of Each Other. My Belief Is
That, In A Very Few Years, Scarcely Any Other Description Of Books Will
Be Published, And In That Case We That Are First In The Field May Hope
To Win The Race."
Mr. Murray's Intention Was To Include In The Library Works On A Variety
Of Subjects, Including History, Biography, Voyages And Travels, Natural
History, Science, And General Literature. They Were To Be Written By The
Best-Known Authors Of The Day--Sir Walter Scott, Southey, Milman,
Lockhart, Washington Irving, Barrow, Allan Cunningham, Dr. Brewster,
Captain Head, G.R. Gleig, Palgrave, And Others. The Collection Was
Headed By An Admirable "Life Of Napoleon," By J.G. Lockhart, Partly
Condensed From Scott's "Life Of Napoleon Bonaparte," And Illustrated By
George Cruikshank. When Lockhart Was First Invited To Undertake This
Biography He Consulted Sir Walter Scott As To The Propriety Of His Doing
So. Sir Walter Replied:
_Sir W. Scott To Mr. Lockhart_.
_October_ 30, 1828.
"Your Scruples About Doing An Epitome Of The 'Life Of Boney' For The
Family Library That Is To Be, Are A Great Deal Over Delicate. My Book In
Nine Thick Volumes Can Never Fill The Place Which Our Friend Murray
Wants You To Fill, And Which If You Don't Some One Else Will Right Soon.
Moreover, You Took Much Pains In Helping Me When I Was Beginning My
Chapter 26 ( Napier's "Peninsular War"--Choker's "Boswell"--"The Family Library," Etc.) Pg 125Task, And I Afterwards Greatly Regretted That Constable Had No Means Of
Remunerating You, As No Doubt He Intended When You Were Giving Him So
Much Good Advice In Laying Down His Grand Plans About The Miscellany. By
All Means Do What The Emperor [Footnote: From The Time Of His Removal To
Albemarle Street, Mr. Murray Was Universally Known Among "The Trade" As
"The Emperor Of The West."] Asks. He Is What The Emperor Napoleon Was
Not, Much A Gentleman, And Knowing Our Footing In All Things, Would Not
Have Proposed Anything That Ought To Have Excited Scruples On Your
Side." [Footnote: Lockhart's "Life Of Scott."]
The Book Met With A Warm Reception From The Public, And Went Through
Many Editions.
Among Other Works Published In "The Family Library" Was The Rev. H.H.
Milman's "History Of The Jews," In Three Vols., Which Occasioned Much
Adverse Criticism And Controversy. It Is Difficult For Us Who Live In
Such Different Times To Understand Or Account For The Tempest Of
Disapprobation With Which A Work, Which Now Appears So Innocent, Was
Greeted, Or The Obloquy With Which Its Author Was Assailed. The "History
Of The Jews" Was Pronounced _Unsound_; It Was Alleged That The Miracles
Had Been Too Summarily Disposed Of; Abraham Was Referred To As An Arab
Sheik, And Jewish History Was Too Sacred To Be Submitted To The Laws Of
Ordinary Investigation. Hence Milman Was Preached Against, From Sunday
To Sunday, From The University And Other Pulpits. Even Mr. Sharon Turner
Expostulated With Mr. Murray As To The Publication Of The Book. He Said
He Had Seen It In The Window Of Carlile, The Infidel Bookseller, "As If
He Thought It Suited His Purpose." The Following Letter Is Interesting
As Indicating What The Jews Themselves Thought Of The History.
_Mr. Magnus To John Murray_. _March_ 17, 1834.
Sir,
Will You Have The Goodness To Inform Me Of The Christian Name Of The
Rev. Mr. Milman, And The Correct Manner Of Spelling His Name; As A
Subscription Is About To Be Opened By Individuals Of The Jewish Nation
For The Purpose Of Presenting Him
Comments (0)