The Chinese Classics by James Legge (ereader for textbooks .TXT) 📕

is guilty of doing evil, a superior man will not associate with him. Pi Hsi is in rebellion; if you go to him, what shall be said?’ Confucius replied, ‘Yes, I did use those words. But is it not said that if a thing be really hard, it may be ground without being made thin; and if it be really white, it may be steeped in a dark fluid without being made black? Am I a bitter gourd? Am I to be hung up out of the way of being eaten [1]?’

These sentiments sound strangely from his lips. After all, he did not go to Pi Hsi; and having travelled as far as the Yellow river that he might see one of the principal ministers of Tsin, he heard of the violent death of two men of worth, and returned to Wei, lamenting the fate which prevented him from crossing the stream, and trying to solace himself with poetry as he had done on leaving Lu. Again did he communicate with the duke, but as ineffectually, and disgusted at being questioned by him about military tactics, he left and went back to Ch’an.

He resided in Ch’an all the next year, B.C. 491, without anything occurring there which is worthy of note [2]. Events had transpired in Lu, however, which were to issue in his return to his native State. The duke Ting had deceased B.C. 494, and Chi Hwan, the chief of the Chi family, died in this year. On his deathbed, he felt remorse for his conduct to Confucius, and charged his successor, known to us in the Analects as Chi K’ang, to recall the sage; but the charge was not immediately fulfilled. Chi K’ang, by the advice of one of his officers, sent to Ch’an for the disciple Yen Ch’iu instead. Confucius willingly sent him off, and would gladly have accompanied him. ‘Let me return!’ he said, ‘Let me return [3]!’ But that was not to be for several years yet.

In B.C. 490, accompanied, as usual, by several of his disciples, he went from Ch’an to Ts’ai, a small dependency of the great fief of Ch’u, which occupied a large part of the present provinces of Hu-nan and Hu-pei. On the way, between Ch’an and Ts’ai, their provisions became exhausted, and they were cut off somehow from obtaining a fresh supply. The disciples were quite overcome with want, and Tsze-lu said to the master, ‘Has the superior man indeed to endure in this way?’ Confucius answered him, ‘The superior man may indeed have to endure want; but the mean man

l Ana. XVII. vii.

2 Tso Ch’iu-ming, indeed, relates a story of Confucius, on the report of a fire in Lu, telling whose ancestral temple had been destroyed by it.

3 Ana. V. xxi.

when he is in want, gives way to unbridled license [1].’ According to the ‘Narratives of the School,’ the distress continued seven days, during which time Confucius retained his equanimity, and was even cheerful, playing on his lute and singing [2]. He retained, however, a strong impression of the perils of the season, and we find him afterwards recurring to it, and lamenting that of the friends that were with him in Ch’an and Ts’ai, there were none remaining to enter his door [3].

Escaped from this strait, he remained in Ts’ai over B.C. 489, and in the following year we find him in Sheh, another district of Ch’u, the chief of which had taken the title of duke, according to the usurping policy of that State. Puzzled about his visitor, he asked Tsze-lu what he should think of him, but the disciple did not venture a reply. When Confucius heard of it, he said to Tsze-lu. ‘Why did you not say to him:— He is simply a man who in his eager pursuit of knowledge forgets his food, who in the joy of its attainment forgets his sorrows, and who does not perceive that old age is coming on [4]?’ Subsequently, the duke, in conversation with Confucius, asked him about government, and got the reply, dictated by some circumstances of which we are ignorant, ‘Good government obtains, when those who are near are made happy, and those who are far off are attracted [5]’

After a short stay in Sheh, according to Sze-ma Ch’ien, he returned to Ts’ai, and having to dross a river, he sent Tsze-lu to inquire for the ford of two men who were at work in a neighboring field. They were recluses, men who had withdrawn from public life in disgust at the waywardness of the times. One of them was called Ch’ang-tsu, and instead of giving Tsze-lu the information he wanted, he asked him, ‘Who is it that holds the reins in the carriage there?’ ‘It is K’ung Ch’iu.’ ‘K’ung Ch’iu of Lu?’ ‘Yes,’ was the reply, and then the man rejoined, ‘He knows the ford.’

Tsze-lu applied to the other, who was called Chieh-ni, but got for answer the question, ‘Who are you, Sir?’ He replied, ‘I am Chung Yu.’ ‘Chung Yu, who is the disciple of K’ung Ch’iu of Lu?’ ‘Yes,’ again replied Tsze-lu, and Chieh-ni said to him, ‘Disorder, like a swelling flood, spreads over the whole kingdom,

1 Ana. XV. i. 2, 3.

2 ������, ������, ������, ���������.

3 Ana. XI. ii.

4 Ana. VII. xviii.

5 Ana. XIII. xvi.

and who is he that will change it for you? Than follow one who merely withdraws from this one and that one, had you not better follow those who withdraw from the world altogether?’ With this he fell to covering up the seed, and gave no more heed to the stranger. Tsze-lu went back and reported what they had said, when Confucius vindicated his own course, saying. ‘It is impossible to associate with birds and beasts as if they were the same with us. If I associate not with these people,— with mankind,— with whom shall I associate? If right principles prevailed through the kingdom, there would be no need for me to change its state [1].’

About the same time he had an encounter with another recluse, who was known as ‘The madman of Ch’u.’ He passed by the carriage of Confucius, singing out, ‘O phoenix, O phoenix, how is your virtue degenerated! As to the past, reproof is useless, but the future may be provided against. Give up, give up your vain pursuit.’ Confucius alighted and wished to enter into conversation with him, but the man hastened away [2].

But now the attention of the ruler of Ch’u — king, as he styled himself — was directed to the illustrious stranger who was in his dominions, and he met Confucius and conducted him to his capital, which was in the present district of I-ch’ang, in the department of Hsiang-yang [3], in Hu-pei. After a time, he proposed endowing the philosopher with a considerable territory, but was dissuaded by his prime minister, who said to him, ‘Has your majesty any officer who could discharge the duties of an ambassador like Tsze-kung? or any one so qualified for a premier as Yen Hui? or any one to compare as a general with Tsze-lu? The kings Wan and Wu, from their hereditary dominions of a hundred li, rose to the sovereignty of the kingdom. If K’ung Ch’iu, with such disciples to be his ministers, get the possession of any territory, it will not be to the prosperity of Ch’u [4]? On this remonstrance the king gave up his purpose; and, when he died in the same year, Confucius left the State, and went back again to Wei.

The duke Ling had died four years before, soon after Confucius

[Sidebar] B.C. 489.

had last parted from him, and the reigning duke, known to us by the title of Ch’u [5], was his grandson, and was holding the principality against his own father. The relations

1 Ana. XVIII. vi.

2 Ana XVII. v.

3 ������������������.

4 See the ������, ������������, p. 10.

5 ������.

between them were rather complicated. The father had been driven out in consequence of an attempt which he had instigated on the life of his step-mother, the notorious Nan-tsze, and the succession was given to his son. Subsequently, the father wanted to reclaim what he deemed his right, and an unseemly struggle ensued. The duke Ch’u was conscious how much his cause would be strengthened by the support of Confucius, and hence when he got to Wei, Tsze-lu could say to him, ‘The prince of Wei has been waiting for you, in order with you to administer the government;— what will you consider the first thing to be done [1]?’ The opinion of the philosopher, however, was against the propriety of the duke’s course [2], and he declined taking office with him, though he remained in Wei for between five and six years. During all that time there is a blank in his history. In the very year of his return, according to the ‘Annals of the Empire,’ his most beloved disciple, Yen Hui, died, on which occasion he exclaimed, ‘Alas! Heaven is destroying me! Heaven is destroying me [3]!’ The death of his wife is assigned to B.C. 484, but nothing else is related which we can connect with this long period.

9. His return to Lu was brought about by the disciple Yen Yu, who, we have seen, went into the service of Chi K’ang, in B.C. 491.

[Sidebar] From his return to Lu to his death. B.C. 484-478.

In the year B.C. 483, Yu had the conduct of some military operations against Ch’i, and being successful, Chi K’ang asked him how he had obtained his military skill;— was it from nature, or by learning? He replied that he had learned it from Confucius, and entered into a glowing eulogy of the philosopher. The chief declared that he would bring Confucius home again to Lu. ‘If you do so,’ said the disciple, ‘see that you do not let mean men come between you and him.’ On this K’ang sent three officers with appropriate presents to Wei, to invite the wanderer home, and he returned with them accordingly [4].

This event took place in the eleventh year of the duke Ai [5], who succeeded to Ting, and according to K’ung Fu, Confucius’s descendant, the invitation proceeded from him [6]. We may suppose that

1 Ana. XIII. iii. In the notes on this passage, I have given Chu Hsi’s opinion as to the time when Tsze-lu made this remark. It seems more correct, however, to refer it to Confucius’s return to Wei from Ch’u, as is done by Chiang Yung.

2 Ana. VII. xiv.

3 Ana. XI. viii. In the notes on Ana. XI. vii, I have adverted to the chronological difficulty connected with the dates assigned respectively to the deaths of Yen Hui and Confucius’s own son, Li. Chiang Yung assigns Hui’s death to B.C. 481.

4 See the ������, ������������.

5 ������.

6 See Chiang Yung’s memoir, in loc.

while Chi K’ang was the mover and director of the proceeding, it was with the authority and approval of the duke. It is represented in the chronicle of Tso Ch’iu-ming as having occurred at a very opportune time. The philosopher had been consulted a little before by K’ung Wan [1], an officer of Wei, about how he should conduct a feud with another officer, and disgusted at being referred to on such a subject, had ordered his carriage and prepared to leave the State, exclaiming, ‘The bird chooses its tree. The tree does not choose the bird.’ K’ung Wan endeavoured to excuse himself, and to prevail on Confucius to remain in Wei, and just at this juncture the messengers from Lu arrived [2].

Confucius was now in his sixty-ninth year. The world had not dealt kindly with him. In every State which he had visited he had met with disappointment and sorrow. Only five more years remained to him,