Covid-19 - The Lies and the Fraud by Terence Smart (ereader for comics txt) 📕

Dr. Michael Yeadon replied in a recent public social media comment to a colleague in the UK; “All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been… in development for more than a few months.” Yeadon then went on to declare,

“If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for…whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.”

Yeadon is well qualified to make the critique. As he notes in the comment, “I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO…. of a biotech I founded (Ziarco – acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D.” He was formerly with Pfizer at a very senior level.

The most important, meaningful phase of CV-19 vaccine trials has barely begun, let alone been completed

“The Covid-19 vaccine trials appear to have caused some confusion. Hopefully, this article might help clear things up a bit. People genuinely appear to believe that the Covid 19 vaccines have undergone clinical trials and have been proven to be both safe and effective. That belief is simply wrong” - By Iain Davis at https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/03/what-vaccine-trials/

Part of this fearmongering and lies from the mainstream media and government and psychological abuse is so that the people will accept the covid vaccine to get their lives back, or so they think. This is psychological abuse and manipulation right out of the Communist Manifesto and that is to socially isolate your enemies so that they conform or submit to your agenda. This is the tactics of social distancing, not allowed to see your friends or family or even attend funerals or have a birthday party for your child. Who is the number one U.K governments behavioral scientist (making people conform)? It is Susan Michie, a lifelong campaigner for hardline Soviet-style communism (she is a member of the communist party in the U.K) whose specialism is not medicine, but behavioral science. Communism an ideology that has killed over 100 million people in the world over the past 100 years.

We are told the covid vaccine is 95% effective but again that is another lie. Everyone was thoroughly impressed with the 95% effective claim.

However, this was based upon relative risk reduction. That is the declared percentage difference between the vaccinated group’s 8/18310 chance (0.044%) of developing COVID 19 against a 162/18319 (0.88%) chance of COVID 19 symptoms without the vaccine. Using Pfizer’s figures, the relative risk reduction is 100(1 – (0.044/0.88)). Which is 95%. This sounds fantastic and is a much better marketing strategy than reporting the absolute risk reduction. The absolute risk of developing COVID 19 symptoms without the vaccine is 0.88% and with the vaccine 0.044%. In absolute terms, the effectiveness of the vaccine is (0.88-0.044)%. A risk reduction of 0.84%. So should we really vaccinate 67 million people in the UK because it reduces their risk of getting covid symptoms by 0.84% and the vast, vast majority of the U.K population has a 99.7% chance of recovering from Covid which is nearly a certainty. My daughter had Covid and she could not taste or smell anything for 3 days but she had no other symptoms and otherwise was totally fine. The authorities are trying to tell us that she needs a vaccine and she won’t be able to travel or do anything unless she has proof of a Covid vaccine.

Another striking bias is the trial selection, particularly the age combined with health status. We've shown above that frail and elderly people are by far the most likely to suffer from COVID-19. But only 2% of the Pfizer trial includes patients over 75 years old and with pre-existing medical conditions. In addition, subjects of any age with comorbities are grossly under-represented. In total, only one out of five of the people appear to have an underlying condition, and for the various individual underlying conditions, the percentage of people suffering from them is often less than 1%. Also the limited size of the vaccine group (about 20,000 participants) does not exhibit all the age/race/sex/disease/treatment/genetic profile combinations that the general population does. There is no safety data whatsoever about children, immune-compromised individuals or pregnant women because they were excluded from the trial. Basically Pfizer selected young and healthy subjects for testing a vaccine that is now administered as a priority to old and sick individuals. What is the point of studying healthy young individuals, who, vaccinated or not, are barely affected by COVID-19 anyway? Does this bias minimize side effects and maintain the illusion of a safe 'vaccine'? - https://www.sott.net/article/447849-The-Inanity-of-RNA-Vaccines-For-COVID-19

See the article below:

Below an excellent professional made short documentary showing how the covid vaccine trials are rigged to show that they are effective.

THE VACCINE TRIALS - SHORT DOCUMENTARY FILM 2021

https://www.bitchute.com/video/0YMOBQVUlVWD/

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/the-vaccine-trials-documentary-2021_nua467H57xZjlAm.html

“Not only is the media downplaying the COVID-19 gene therapy side effects, but they seem content to simply repeat the drug makers’ overly optimistic claims of efficacy. You have probably heard that both the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines” are 95% effective. This is a false claim. Yet, the medical establishment and the government bureaucrats have simply taken these pharmaceutical companies’ word for it and are encouraging everyone to line up for their “vaccines.” At the time the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna products were approved, these pharmaceutical companies had failed to release most of the raw data from their trials. In fact, they are still withholding much of it. However, now that more of it is available for review, a different picture is emerging. British Medical Journal (BMJ) Associate Editor Peter Doshi, who had the opportunity to review the available data, pointed out the inconsistencies and weaknesses of the pre-approval trials. He concluded that rather than the widely publicized 95% effective rate, these “vaccines” are, at best, 19% effective. At this low rate, they would never have been approved!” - Dr. Hotze - Founder and CEO of the Hotze Health & Wellness Center in Houston, Texas.

https://www.hotzehwc.com/2021/02/dr-hotze-on-the-dangers-of-the-covid-19-vaccine/

In May 2020 Robert F. Kennedy Jr gave an interview (link below) about the history of coronavirus vaccine development, which began in 2002, following three consecutive SARS outbreaks.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/05/10/is-there-a-vaccine-for-coronavirus.aspx

The four best vaccines developed by scientists were then given to ferrets, which are the closest analogue to human lung infections. In the interview above, Kennedy explains what happened next. While the ferrets displayed robust antibody response, which is the metric used for vaccine licensing, once they were challenged with the wild virus, they all became severely ill and died.

The same thing happened when they tried to develop an RSV vaccine in the 1960s. RSV is an upper respiratory illness that is very similar to that caused by coronaviruses. At that time, they had decided to skip animal trials and go directly to human trials.

"They tested it on I think about 35 children, and the same thing happened," Kennedy said. "The children developed a champion antibody response — robust, durable. It looked perfect [but when] the children were exposed to the wild virus, they all became sick. Two of them died. They abandoned the vaccine. It was a big embarrassment to FDA and NIH."

If the vaccine does not result in a robust response in neutralizing antibodies, you might be at risk for more severe lung disease if you're infected with the virus.

What happens then if the power that be release a new virus, does that mean all the people who have had this new coronavirus vaccine will be severely ill or die? If millions of people are taking this vaccine, then that could be catastrophic. But they could claim it was the new virus that killed them when in reality it was the vaccine just like it was with the ferrets.

COVID-19 vaccines are NOT designed to prevent infection. As detailed in "How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged," a "successful" vaccine merely needs to reduce the severity of the symptoms. They're not even looking at reducing infection, hospitalization or death rates.

Below how the COVID-19 vaccine can destroy your immune system:

https://www.sott.net/article/445095-How-COVID-19-vaccine-can-destroy-your-immune-system

The plan to develop the Covid-19 vaccine is profit driven.

The US government had already ordered 100 million doses back in July 2020 and the EU is to purchase 300 million doses. It's Big Money for Big Pharma, generous payoffs to corrupt politicians, at the expense of tax payers.

The objective is ultimately to make money, by vaccinating the entire planet of 7.8 billion people for SARS-CoV-2.

The Covid vaccine in some cases envisages more than one shot. If this initiative were to go ahead as planned, it would be the largest vaccine project in World history and the biggest money making operation for Big Pharma.

https://www.sott.net/article/448663-Big-Pharmas-COVID-vaccine

The new Covid vaccines will make billions of dollars for the big pharmaceutical companies, but here's what they won't do:

The vaccines will not cure Covid.

The vaccines will not prevent people from contracting Covid.

The vaccines will not prevent Covid-related hospitalizations.

The vaccines will not prevent Covid-caused deaths.

If the vaccine cannot reduce infection, hospitalization or death, then it cannot end the pandemic, then what is the point in taking the vaccine especially when it could come with side effects.

There are serious risks associated with taking the Covid-19 vaccine. Most vaccine recipients will experience only minor aches and pains but some will undoubtedly get quite ill and permanently damage their health. No one really knows for sure because there have been no long-term trials.

The vaccine campaign is built on a foundation of lies and deception. When the vaccine companies said that their vaccine is "95% effective", it does NOT mean that- if you get vaccinated- you will be immune to Covid. It doesn't even mean that you won't get violently ill and die. All it means is that the vaccine reduced the symptoms of some of the people in the trials who tested positive. They have hoodwinked the masses with the help of the media into believing that the covid vaccine is 95% effective, what nonsense.

In a recent letter to the British Medical Journal (BMJ), physician Arvind Joshi warned against the disaster that could result from this misguided policy and outlined the serious risks involved to the public and other serious issues that are being taken if a Covid Vaccine is rushed out without thorough and adequate safety and efficacy testing:

"Adverse effects like Subacute Sclerosing Pan Encephalitis, Ascending Polyneuritis, Myopathies, Autoimmune Diseases, and rarer chance of triggering development of malignancies are most dreaded possibilities. The rush for the Vaccines should not lead to disaster."

Below the letter to the BMJ:

https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fa5866942937a4d73918723/5fbd13488af2de09d68bd61c_UKMFA_Letter_to_MHRA_JCVI.pdf

This excellent article by Kit Knightly at Off-Guardian asks 5 Questions to Ask Your Friends Who Plan to Get the Covid Vaccine

No successful vaccine against a coronavirus has ever been developed.

Vaccine development is a slow, laborious process. Usually, from development through testing and finally being approved for public use takes many years. The various vaccines for Covid have all been developed and approved in less than a year. None of the vaccines have yet been subject to proper trials. Many of them