The Global Elites Population Cull by Terence Smart (epub e ink reader TXT) 📕

Greenpeace co-founder and former president of Greenpeace Canada Patrick Moore described the cynical and corrupt machinations fueling the narrative of global warming and “climate change” in an interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight

Patrick Moore said:

“And so you’ve got the green movement creating stories that instill fear in the public. You’ve got the media echo chamber — fake news — repeating it over and over and over again to everybody that they’re killing their children. And then you’ve got the green politicians who are buying scientists with government money to produce fear for them in the form of scientific-looking materials. And then you’ve got the green businesses, the rent-seekers, and the crony capitalists who are taking advantage of massive subsidies, huge tax write-offs, and government mandates requiring their technologies to make a fortune on this. And then, of course, you’ve got the scientists who are willingly, they’re basically hooked on government grants. When they talk about the 99 percent consensus [among scientists] on climate change, that’s a completely ridiculous and false number. But most of the scientists — put it in quotes, scientists — who are pushing this catastrophic theory are getting paid by public money, they are not being paid by General Electric or Dupont or 3M to do this research, where private companies expect to get something useful from their research that might produce a better product and make them a profit in the end because people want it — build a better mousetrap type of idea. But most of what these so-called scientists are doing is simply producing more fear so that politicians can use it to control people’s minds and get their votes because some of the people are convinced, ‘Oh, this politician can save my kid from certain doom.’

Moore continued:

“It is the biggest lie since people thought the Earth was at the center of the universe. This is Galileo-type stuff. If you remember, Galileo discovered that the sun was at the center of the solar system and the Earth revolved around it. He was sentenced to death by the Catholic Church, and only because he recanted was he allowed to live in house arrest for the rest of his life. So this was around the beginning of what we call the Enlightenment, when science became the way in which we gained knowledge instead of using superstition and instead of using invisible demons and whatever else, we started to understand that you have to have observation of actual events and then you have to repeat those observations over and over again, and that is basically the scientific method. But this abomination that is occurring today in the climate issue is the biggest threat to the Enlightenment that has occurred since Galileo,” declared Moore. “Nothing else comes close to it. This is as bad a thing that has happened on science in the history of science.”

Moore concluded, “It’s taking over science with superstition and a kind of toxic combination of religion and political ideology. There is no truth to this. It is a complete hoax and scam. Climate has ALWAYS changed from decade to decade. There were major swings (volatility) during the 1930s. You had the dust bowl during the summer and in 1936 you had record cold. The 1936 North American cold wave, which also hit Japan and China, still rank among the most intense cold waves in the recorded history of North America. You cannot blame this on soccer moms driving the kids around town burning fossil fuels. Cars were a luxury in the 1930s still. There is just no evidence of human-induced climate change. There is nobody willing to call them out on this nonsense with just showing the dramatic swings in temperature over the centuries”.

The two longest-standing thermometer datasets are kept by the U.K. Met Office. They include the HadCRUT4 dataset, which has been continuously updated since 1850, and the Central England temperature record, the world’s longest regional record that dates to 1659.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and most other doom-mongers promoting a link between human activities and the current warming, use the HadCRUT4 data. The graph shows temperature data from 1850 to 2017 derived from direct thermometer readings and reveals that there has been a general overall warming trend of about 0.85°C (1.5°F) over the last 167 years. But this temperature data collected by the IPCC is deceptive as it was from the end of the “Little Ice Age” in the mid-1850s when naturally the earth when coming out of this cold spell would get warmer. The graph does not show the warm temperatures before the ‘Little Ice Age’.

Below the deceptive IPCC hockey stick graph

Below the very similar graph from the HadCrut4 dataset which shows a very slight rise in the Earth’s temperature over the last 160 years.

The reason that the climate change doom-mongers use the two graphs above is because it is easier to prove that there is a link between human activity and CO2 in the atmosphere when they use this short time span of Earth’s temperature.

The global warming that began in 1976 suddenly and inexplicably stopped in 1998. So CO2 had been increasing but the warming stopped. That’s when Global Warming suddenly morphed into Climate Change.

Let us take a look at the rise and fall of the Earth’s temperature over a much wider time period.

The graph below represents 800,000 years of temperature data. The 100,000-year cycles of ice ages and interglacial warm periods show up clearly.

So it is obvious that a few times in the past the Earth was warmer than today and temperatures rose steeply over a period of time and then declined. But there was NO CO2 emissions from humans at these times but the temperature still climbed. So why are humans being blamed for any current warming of the earth when in the past they were not to blame?

Look at the graph above. 120,000 years ago, the temperature was 8°C (14°F) warmer than today. The polar bears survived and glaciers didn’t melt and sea levels did not rise.

If you look at the temperature of the earth over the last 10,000 years you can clearly see that today’s temperature is pretty low compared to the past which makes a mockery of the climate change alarmist’s theory.

In the graph below we can see that temperatures fell pretty low between 1600 and 1800 and this was known as the ‘Little Ice Age’.

Obviously our current warming trend is a natural result of the Earth leaving the ‘Little Ice Age’ and is not due to CO2 emissions from human activity.

“All this argument, is the temperature going up or not, it’s absurd. Of course it’s going up. It has gone up since the early 1800s, before the Industrial Revolution, because we’re coming out of the Little Ice Age, not because we’re putting more carbon dioxide into the air.” - Dr. Reid Bryson, Meteorologist.

The graph below shows 65 million years of temperature data. For the bulk of this time earth was so warm that there was no ice at either pole. Only in the relatively recent past has there been any ice at the northern pole. Based on this data, we are living within the coldest period in the last 65 million years.

You will hear from the climate warming alarmists that our temperatures are unusual and unprecedented and are due to human activity. But the earth’s temperatures have always gone up and down throughout the history of the world. Below is the graph for the earth’s temperature over the past 65 million years.

In fact over the past 65 million years we are in one of the coldest periods. There is no global warming, there is no climate change it is a natural tendency of the Earth to go through periods of warming and cooling.

A recent study by economist Bjorn Lomborg estimated that the cost of measures to slow down global warming would be $1.5 trillion per year. What would be the results of this massive outlay of money? According to Lomborg’s calculations temperatures will have been reduced in his best case by 0.17°C (0.31°F). That is less than half of a degree Fahrenheit, or $42 trillion for each reduction of one-tenth of a degree Fahrenheit in global temperature. Would it be worth it and who gets the bulk of this money? The ones who profit are the global elite, the exact ones who are bringing this climate change hoax to the world.

It is pretty simple the earth has warmer periods and cooler periods. From around 800 A.D. to 1200 the planet warmed considerably and civilization prospered. Virtually all of northern Europe, the British Isles, Scandinavia, Greenland, and Iceland were considerably warmer than at present at that time and somehow I don’t believe they had carbon emissions around then. Earth's climate was in a cool period from A.D. 1400 to about A.D. 1860 which is dubbed the "Little Ice Age." But the Global Elite have conned most of the world into believing that this warmer period we are in is in fact caused by humans and they need to extract money from us to pay for it. What about that big yellow thing in the sky, called the Sun, doesn’t that have anything to do with heating this earth up with its solar flares and variations in the sun's energy output. Because of this climate change scam the Global Elite have lined up an agenda for the population of this world and it is called Agenda 21 (they have now renamed it to Agenda 2030), it is frightening, you should take a look.

Wikipedia defines the UN’s Agenda 21 as “An action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development”.

“Sustainable development” is the catch-phrase we should be afraid of, very afraid. Its plan dictates where one can live and what land should be designated for would, under fully-realized Agenda 21 plan, be controlled by the United Nations and a future one-world government. The odd thing is that most people have simply not heard of Agenda 21 – although local authorities across the country, and government institutions across the world, at national and local level, have signed up to it. In fact nearly every country in the world has signed up for this fascist dictatorship.

It was back in 1992 that the Earth Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro, and here 179 nations officially signed up to Agenda 21 — many more have followed since. Maurice Strong has been the driving force behind the imposition of Agenda 21, and was also a member of the UN’s Commission on Global Governance. Below are several quotes by Maurice Strong that I feel make scary reading?

“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class — involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air conditioning, and suburban housing – are not sustainable.” (At the Rio Earth Summit).

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that the threat of global warming would fit the bill, the real enemy then is humanity itself, we believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realise world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or one invented for the purpose.” (Maurice Strong at the Club of Rome)

You should be very wary of anything that has Smart in front of its name such as Smart Meters, Smart growth or the word ‘sustainable’ because they are all to do with this fascist dictatorship known as Agenda 21.

I will just include a bit of information on Smart Meters because according to research they can be hazardous to your health. Some 65 million American homes already have them, and more are being converted all the time, even against the will of some homeowners. And yet many doctors agree that smart meters are a potential health threat due to constant releases of radiation. The constant pulses of energy as smart meters communicate both with electrical appliances inside the home, and with the energy company, are a radioactive threat that's about 100 times greater than that of a mobile phone, science has found. This is a tremendous radioactive load when you consider that smart meters operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The fact that they never turn off means they're a lot like talking on a cell phone constantly, without end. This is not too good for your health, because electromagnetic pollution like the kind emitted by smart meters is highly damaging to the body. There are reports of chronic headaches, seizures, insomnia, dizziness, heart palpitations, tinnitus (ringing in the ears) and other symptoms associated with exposure to smart meters.

Independent studies have revealed that both the strength and frequency of smart meter pulses make them exceptionally threatening. The Center for Electrosmog Prevention, a California non-profit group, estimates that one smart meter emits the radiation equivalent of about 160 mobile phones. Other studies have concluded that smart meters emit not 100 but 1,000 times the radioactive load of