The 9/11 Deception and False Flag Terror by Terence Smart (summer books txt) 📕

– millions more refugees, thousands more dead, trillions more wasted. In order to correct our policy we need to understand who got us into this mess in the first place. The 9/11 event as a false flag operation and the War on Terror campaign were both conceived by Israeli military intelligence in the 1970s under the leadership of Menachem Begin, the self-proclaimed "Father of Terrorism" and founder of the Likud party who became prime minister in 1977. War on Terror doctrine was rolled out in July 1979 at a Netanyahu Institute conference in Jerusalem. The Israeli trick was to get the U.S. military to neutralize and fragment its enemies, most notably Iraq and Syria, under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Since 1979, this devious plan has been openly promoted by Benjamin Netanyahu. On 9/11, War on Terror proponent Netanyahu told the New York Times that the terror atrocity was "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations”. Christopher Bollyn, author ‘The war on terror- the plot to rule the Middle East and Solving 9/11, Bollyn.com.

These Middle East wars where millions of innocent people have died were fought for powerful Jewish Zionists in Israel and America. Now do you understand why Hitler did not trust the Jews? But World War 2 is another story that the masses of people have been deceived about.

On September 23, 1980, a war started between Iraq and Iran that was to last eight years. The United States considered Saddam Hussein its ally in the fight against the Khomeini regime in Iran.

After the war between the Arab countries and Israel in 1967, Iraq had severed all
diplomatic relationships with the United States. This changed when the war between Iran and Iraq started.

Recently released documents show how deep the U.S. was entangled in the serious crimes attributed to Hussein, in particular regarding the use of chemical weapons against Iran.

Even when it became clear that Iraq had used chemical weapons against Iranian and Kurdish soldiers, the U.S. government kept supporting Hussein. After Hussein had used chemical weapons to suppress a Kurdish revolt in the north, a representative of the State Department made the following remark: “OK, he is a crook. But he’s our crook.”

On May 16, 1988, Hussein attacked his own population in the north of Iraq with chemical weapons: on a single day, more than 5000 people were killed. This attack led to worldwide condemnation. The United States did not issue a single protest! Saddam Hussein could continue to count on the growing support of the U.S. It cannot be ignored that certain elements of the nerve gas Iraq used against Iran came from an American company called La Farge. Bush Sr. had once been one of the main owners of that company, and the director at the time was Hillary Clinton!

I believe they were giving Saddam Hussein and Iraq a false sense of security, no matter what Hussein did the U.S.A would support him. But that was to change.

When George H.W. Bush succeeded Ronald Reagan as president, America’s friendly position
towards Iraq remained unchanged.

When the Iraqi regime threatened U.S. oil interests in the Persian Gulf, Saddam Hussein suddenly became a demon, and was portrayed as the personification of evil. Officially political support for Iraq stopped on that August day in 1990 when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait and was surprised by the backlash he received from the United States

In July 1990 a trap was to be set for Saddam Hussein. President Bush authorized U.S. ambassador April Glaspie to meet with President Hussein. The purpose of the meeting was to reassure President Saddam Hussein that the United States had no quarrel with him and would not intervene in any inter-Arab border disputes. This was a clear reference to Iraq’s dispute with Kuwait over the Rumalia oilfields. The Iraqis took Glaspie’s words as a signal from Washington that they could send their army into Kuwait.

U.S. Ambassador Glaspie:
‘We have no opinion on your Arab - - Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary of State James Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960’s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America’

When the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait started on August 2, 1990, the Iraqi fleet was limited, Iraqi submarines were absent, the technology of the communication systems limited and Iraqi soldiers few and poorly motivated. Why was Saddam Hussein given the go-ahead for the invasion when it was clear in advance that his troops might easily be beaten? Why was this war started without giving a clear warning to the Iraqi leader (which would certainly have meant calling off the attack)?

Public opinion in the U.S.A was not yet ready to accept the idea of a military intervention against Iraq. In an attempt to sway public opinion against Iraq a huge lie was fed to the public and it was a huge Jewish lie yet again. The willingness of the American people to go to war changed completely, however, on October 10, 1990, when a fifteen-year-old girl from Kuwait was introduced to Congress. This girl, “Nayirah”, told Congress that she had been working as a volunteer in a hospital in Kuwait, and that there she had seen how Iraqi soldiers had taken little babies from their incubators and thrown them on the floor.

Television flashed her testimony around the world. It electrified opposition to Iraq's president, Saddam Hussein, who was now portrayed by U.S. president George Bush not only as "the Butcher of Baghdad" but – so much for old friends – "a tyrant worse than Hitler."

It just goes to shows yet again how pathetic the media is, and how controlled it is.

Bush quoted Nayirah at every opportunity. Six times in one month he referred to "312 premature babies at Kuwait City's maternity hospital who died after Iraqi soldiers stole their incubators and left the infants on the floor and of "babies pulled from incubators and scattered like firewood across the floor." Bush used Nayirah's testimony to lambaste Senate Democrats still supporting "only" sanctions against Iraq – the blockade of trade which alone would cause hundreds of thousands of Iraqis to die of hunger and disease.

Nayirah, though, was no normal eyewitness. She was the daughter of one Saud Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwait's ambassador to the United States. A few key Congressional leaders and reporters knew who Nayirah was, but none of them thought of sharing that minor detail with the media or the public.

Shortly afterward, it became clear that the girl had lied to Congress under an assumed name. Everything Nayirah said, as it turned out, was a lie. There were, in actuality, only a handful of incubators in all of Kuwait, certainly not the "hundreds" she claimed. According to Dr. Mohammed Matar, director of Kuwait's primary care system, and his wife, Dr. Fayeza Youssef, who ran the obstetrics unit at the maternity hospital, there were few if any babies in the incubators at the time of the Iraqi invasion. Nayirah's charges, they said, were totally false. Subsequent investigations, including one by Amnesty International, found no evidence for the incubator claims.

It is likely that Nayirah was not even in Kuwait, let alone at the hospital, at that time; the Kuwaiti aristocracy and their families had fled the country weeks before the anticipated invasion.

As invasions go, Iraq's invasion of Kuwait was relatively bloodless. Despite the heart-rending testimonies TV viewers in the U.S. were subjected to night after night, fewer than 200 Kuwaitis were killed. If you compare that to the estimated 7,500 Panamanians deaths with the U.S invasion of Panama the year before.

The Nayirah incubator lie was arranged by Hill & Knowlton (Jewish), a public relations firm hired to rally the U.S. populace behind Bush's policy of going to war. The satellite photos that revealed that Iraq had troops poised to strike Saudi Arabia was also fabricated by the PR firm Hill & Knowlton. The Pentagon announced in September 1990 that Iraq was massing hundreds of thousands of troops of its border with Saudi Arabia. But when the St. Petersburg Times in Florida decided to look for the evidence and bought commercial satellite images of the area, they found nothing. "That [Iraqi build-up] was the whole justification for Bush sending troops in there, and it just didn't exist," says Jean Heller, the reporter who broke the story.

During the month-and-a-half-long war, the U.S. military dropped 88,500 tons of bombs on Iraq and Kuwait--the most concentrated aerial bombardment in the history of warfare. Many of the bombs were coated with depleted uranium. On the Iraqi side, more than 150,000 civilians and as many soldiers died. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi soldiers, although running away or towards the American soldiers while waving white flags were killed with Napalm. Even after Iraq on February 28, 1991, signed the United Nations resolution thousands of Iraqi civilians on their way to the interior of Iraq, continued to be killed by the U.S. Air Force. Many of those killed while fleeing Kuwait were not Iraqi soldiers, but Palestinians, Sudanese, Egyptians, Filipinos and other imported labourers. Michael Ratner, the former director of the “Centre for Constitutional Rights” established that the allied forces had committed gross violations, against the “The Hague and Geneva Conventions”.

The indiscriminate bombing of tens of thousands of Iraqi troops and civilians retreating from Kuwait is one of the most heinous war crimes in history.

These were two Kuwaiti roadways, littered with remains of 2,000 mangled Iraqi military vehicles, and the charred and dismembered bodies of tens of thousands of Iraqi soldiers, who were withdrawing from Kuwait on February 26th and 27th 1991 in compliance with UN resolutions. Baghdad radio announced that Iraq’s Foreign Minister had accepted the Soviet cease-fire proposal and had issued the order for all Iraqi troops to withdraw to positions held before August 2, 1990 in compliance with UN Resolution 660. But George Bush ignored this and US planes trapped the long convoys by disabling vehicles in the front, and at the rear, and then pounded the resulting traffic jams for hours.

The forty two day carpet bombing against a country of just twenty five million people, with a youthful, conscript army, with half the population under sixteen, and no air force was nothing more than genocide. The country was denied all normality: trade, aid, telecommunications, power, sanitation, water repairs, seeds, foods, pharmaceuticals, and medical equipment. Within twenty four hours, most was destroyed. The electricity went off within two hours, leaving patients on life support machines and vital equipment, babies in incubators, or those on oxygen to die.

Refrigerators defrosted, all medicine needing refrigeration, blood banks and vital saline solutions for the injured were destroyed. Iraq was thus cut off from the world. Iraqis throughout the world had no way of knowing if their families, friends, were dead or alive. Radio and television stations across Iraq were blitzed so no warnings to the people could be given. Hospitals, health clinics, schools and kindergartens were bombed, chicken farms bombed, flocks of sheep and goats, broadly half of all buffalo were killed, dairy farms obliterated. Pharmaceutical factories were bombed, the medical syringe factory was destroyed. Crops, food processing factories reduced to rubble.

Five times more explosive power was dropped on Iraq than on Hiroshima in World War 2. The ‘inhuman acts’, committed against the Iraqi people in 1991 constitute war crimes in which no one was brought to justice.

For years the United States, with the backing of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, imposed numerous embargos on the Iraqi people, accompanied by daily bombardments. More than ten years after the end of the war the U.S. and Great Britain continued to bomb Iraq daily. At the same time the economic sanctions, imposed by the United Nations on the initiative of the United States, caused the deaths of a million Iraqis, mainly the elderly, poor and the children. The World Health Organization (WHO) assumes that since the embargos were first imposed, 800,000 Iraqi children have died and a third of those who managed to survive were underweight and died of malnutrition.

Documents from the U.S. Army show that nearly one million projectiles used against Iraq contained 315 tons of depleted uranium. This amount of depleted uranium has caused an enormous growth in the number of cancer patients and deformed children in Iraq.

Ten years after the Gulf War, over 90,000 U.S. soldiers are ill. The main suspect is ammunition with depleted uranium.

There is no doubt that these Jewish Zionist neocons were the ones who instigated the Iraq war. They wanted Iraq destroyed long before 9/11.

The three main planners and instigators of the war in Iraq were Richard Perle (Defense Policy Board chairman), Paul Wolfowitz (Deputy Defense Secretary) and Douglas Feith (Undersecretary of Defense for Policy), all neocon Jews and dual citizens of the U.S. and Israel.

“The neoconservatives of course were the main driving force behind the war. They initiated the idea of using force to topple Saddam in two letters written to President Clinton in early 1998. Over the next five years, and especially after 9/11, they pushed relentlessly for war against Iraq. No other group or institution in the United States was seriously committed to invading Iraq over that five year period. Indeed, there was significant opposition to invading