History of the Peloponnesian War by Thucydides (free ebooks for android .txt) π
Read free book Β«History of the Peloponnesian War by Thucydides (free ebooks for android .txt) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Thucydides
- Performer: -
Read book online Β«History of the Peloponnesian War by Thucydides (free ebooks for android .txt) πΒ». Author - Thucydides
The design was first mooted in the camp, and afterwards from
thence reached the city. Some persons crossed over from Samos and
had an interview with Alcibiades, who immediately offered to make
first Tissaphernes, and afterwards the King, their friend, if they
would give up the democracy and make it possible for the King to trust
them. The higher class, who also suffered most severely from the
war, now conceived great hopes of getting the government into their
own hands, and of triumphing over the enemy. Upon their return to
Samos the emissaries formed their partisans into a club, and openly
told the mass of the armament that the King would be their friend, and
would provide them with money, if Alcibiades were restored and the
democracy abolished. The multitude, if at first irritated by these
intrigues, were nevertheless kept quiet by the advantageous prospect
of the pay from the King; and the oligarchical conspirators, after
making this communication to the people, now re-examined the proposals
of Alcibiades among themselves, with most of their associates.
Unlike the rest, who thought them advantageous and trustworthy,
Phrynichus, who was still general, by no means approved of the
proposals. Alcibiades, he rightly thought, cared no more for an
oligarchy than for a democracy, and only sought to change the
institutions of his country in order to get himself recalled by his
associates; while for themselves their one object should be to avoid
civil discord. It was not the Kingβs interest, when the Peloponnesians
were now their equals at sea, and in possession of some of the chief
cities in his empire, to go out of his way to side with the
Athenians whom he did not trust, when he might make friends of the
Peloponnesians who had never injured him. And as for the allied states
to whom oligarchy was now offered, because the democracy was to be put
down at Athens, he well knew that this would not make the rebels
come in any the sooner, or confirm the loyal in their allegiance; as
the allies would never prefer servitude with an oligarchy or democracy
to freedom with the constitution which they actually enjoyed, to
whichever type it belonged. Besides, the cities thought that the
so-called better classes would prove just as oppressive as the
commons, as being those who originated, proposed, and for the most
part benefited from the acts of the commons injurious to the
confederates. Indeed, if it depended on the better classes, the
confederates would be put to death without trial and with violence;
while the commons were their refuge and the chastiser of these men.
This he positively knew that the cities had learned by experience, and
that such was their opinion. The propositions of Alcibiades, and the
intrigues now in progress, could therefore never meet with his
approval.
However, the members of the club assembled, agreeably to their
original determination, accepted what was proposed, and prepared to
send Pisander and others on an embassy to Athens to treat for the
restoration of Alcibiades and the abolition of the democracy in the
city, and thus to make Tissaphernes the friend of the Athenians.
Phrynichus now saw that there would be a proposal to restore
Alcibiades, and that the Athenians would consent to it; and fearing
after what he had said against it that Alcibiades, if restored,
would revenge himself upon him for his opposition, had recourse to the
following expedient. He sent a secret letter to the Lacedaemonian
admiral Astyochus, who was still in the neighbourhood of Miletus, to
tell him that Alcibiades was ruining their cause by making
Tissaphernes the friend of the Athenians, and containing an express
revelation of the rest of the intrigue, desiring to be excused if he
sought to harm his enemy even at the expense of the interests of his
country. However, Astyochus, instead of thinking of punishing
Alcibiades, who, besides, no longer ventured within his reach as
formerly, went up to him and Tissaphernes at Magnesia, communicated to
them the letter from Samos, and turned informer, and, if report may be
trusted, became the paid creature of Tissaphernes, undertaking to
inform him as to this and all other matters; which was also the reason
why he did not remonstrate more strongly against the pay not being
given in full. Upon this Alcibiades instantly sent to the
authorities at Samos a letter against Phrynichus, stating what he
had done, and requiring that he should be put to death. Phrynichus
distracted, and placed in the utmost peril by the denunciation, sent
again to Astyochus, reproaching him with having so ill kept the secret
of his previous letter, and saying that he was now prepared to give
them an opportunity of destroying the whole Athenian armament at
Samos; giving a detailed account of the means which he should
employ, Samos being unfortified, and pleading that, being in danger of
his life on their account, he could not now be blamed for doing this
or anything else to escape being destroyed by his mortal enemies. This
also Astyochus revealed to Alcibiades.
Meanwhile Phrynichus having had timely notice that he was playing
him false, and that a letter on the subject was on the point of
arriving from Alcibiades, himself anticipated the news, and told the
army that the enemy, seeing that Samos was unfortified and the fleet
not all stationed within the harbour, meant to attack the camp, that
he could be certain of this intelligence, and that they must fortify
Samos as quickly as possible, and generally look to their defences. It
will be remembered that he was general, and had himself authority to
carry out these measures. Accordingly they addressed themselves to the
work of fortification, and Samos was thus fortified sooner than it
would otherwise have been. Not long afterwards came the letter from
Alcibiades, saying that the army was betrayed by Phrynichus, and the
enemy about to attack it. Alcibiades, however, gained no credit, it
being thought that he was in the secret of the enemyβs designs, and
had tried to fasten them upon Phrynichus, and to make out that he
was their accomplice, out of hatred; and consequently far from hurting
him he rather bore witness to what he had said by this intelligence.
After this Alcibiades set to work to persuade Tissaphernes to become
the friend of the Athenians. Tissaphernes, although afraid of the
Peloponnesians because they had more ships in Asia than the Athenians,
was yet disposed to be persuaded if he could, especially after his
quarrel with the Peloponnesians at Cnidus about the treaty of
Therimenes. The quarrel had already taken place, as the Peloponnesians
were by this time actually at Rhodes; and in it the original
argument of Alcibiades touching the liberation of all the towns by the
Lacedaemonians had been verified by the declaration of Lichas that
it was impossible to submit to a convention which made the King master
of all the states at any former time ruled by himself or by his
fathers.
While Alcibiades was besieging the favour of Tissaphernes with an
earnestness proportioned to the greatness of the issue, the Athenian
envoys who had been dispatched from Samos with Pisander arrived at
Athens, and made a speech before the people, giving a brief summary of
their views, and particularly insisting that, if Alcibiades were
recalled and the democratic constitution changed, they could have
the King as their ally, and would be able to overcome the
Peloponnesians. A number of speakers opposed them on the question of
the democracy, the enemies of Alcibiades cried out against the scandal
of a restoration to be effected by a violation of the constitution,
and the Eumolpidae and Ceryces protested in behalf of the mysteries,
the cause of his banishment, and called upon the gods to avert his
recall; when Pisander, in the midst of much opposition and abuse, came
forward, and taking each of his opponents aside asked him the
following question: In the face of the fact that the Peloponnesians
had as many ships as their own confronting them at sea, more cities in
alliance with them, and the King and Tissaphernes to supply them
with money, of which the Athenians had none left, had he any hope of
saving the state, unless someone could induce the King to come over to
their side? Upon their replying that they had not, he then plainly
said to them: βThis we cannot have unless we have a more moderate form
of government, and put the offices into fewer hands, and so gain the
Kingβs confidence, and forthwith restore Alcibiades, who is the only
man living that can bring this about. The safety of the state, not the
form of its government, is for the moment the most pressing
question, as we can always change afterwards whatever we do not like.β
The people were at first highly irritated at the mention of an
oligarchy, but upon understanding clearly from Pisander that this
was the only resource left, they took counsel of their fears, and
promised themselves some day to change the government again, and
gave way. They accordingly voted that Pisander should sail with ten
others and make the best arrangement that they could with Tissaphernes
and Alcibiades. At the same time the people, upon a false accusation
of Pisander, dismissed Phrynichus from his post together with his
colleague Scironides, sending Diomedon and Leon to replace them in the
command of the fleet. The accusation was that Phrynichus had
betrayed Iasus and Amorges; and Pisander brought it because he thought
him a man unfit for the business now in hand with Alcibiades. Pisander
also went the round of all the clubs already existing in the city
for help in lawsuits and elections, and urged them to draw together
and to unite their efforts for the overthrow of the democracy; and
after taking all other measures required by the circumstances, so that
no time might be lost, set off with his ten companions on his voyage
to Tissaphernes.
In the same winter Leon and Diomedon, who had by this time joined
the fleet, made an attack upon Rhodes. The ships of the Peloponnesians
they found hauled up on shore, and, after making a descent upon the
coast and defeating the Rhodians who appeared in the field against
them, withdrew to Chalce and made that place their base of
operations instead of Cos, as they could better observe from thence if
the Peloponnesian fleet put out to sea. Meanwhile Xenophantes, a
Laconian, came to Rhodes from Pedaritus at Chios, with the news that
the fortification of the Athenians was now finished, and that,
unless the whole Peloponnesian fleet came to the rescue, the cause
in Chios must be lost. Upon this they resolved to go to his relief. In
the meantime Pedaritus, with the mercenaries that he had with him
and the whole force of the Chians, made an assault upon the work round
the Athenian ships and took a portion of it, and got possession of
some vessels that were hauled up on shore, when the Athenians
sallied out to the rescue, and first routing the Chians, next defeated
the remainder of the force round Pedaritus, who was himself killed,
with many of the Chians, a great number of arms being also taken.
After this the Chians were besieged even more straitly than before
by land and sea, and the famine in the place was great. Meanwhile
the Athenian envoys with Pisander arrived at the court of
Tissaphernes, and conferred with him about the proposed agreement.
However, Alcibiades, not being altogether sure of Tissaphernes (who
feared the Peloponnesians more than the Athenians, and besides
wished to wear out both parties, as Alcibiades himself had
recommended), had recourse to the following stratagem to make the
treaty between the Athenians and Tissaphernes miscarry by reason of
the magnitude of his demands. In my opinion Tissaphernes desired
this result,
Comments (0)