Grammar of Life, Poetry of Living by Santosh Jha (motivational novels for students txt) 📕

The aware, evolved and empowered men and women accept and align with God and divinity only as Field or Landscape of Information. They understand and accept that God and divinity is expression of processes within layers of consciousness and has nothing to do with externalities. They experience God and elements of divinity, not through any ritual but through a very personalized and subjective causality of connect. They realize that the idea and idealism of God is a manifestation and expression of processes, within brain states and amenable for actualization within the ‘media’ of Consciousness. Very naturally; they experience divinity in an informal, personal and emotional ways; detached from the actionable regime of ritualism. God and divinity is only experience-field; not action-reaction theatre; very much like love and compassion. Like love; true and real men and women ‘experience’ divinity and never fall in trap of demonstrative and advertorial pageantry.

There is a very powerful symbolism or metaphor of what the true and real experience-landscape of God and divinity can be and should be. This symbol has nothing to do with whether God exists or not. It has nothing to do with the primeval debate of theism and atheism. It is very much like; love is always there within the layers of consciousness, as part of the processes of body-brain plexuses. Love does not need a ‘Body’ to happen. In fact; bodies or personality happens, as media for expression of love and intimacy. Divinity is also there in the consciousness. It does not need a God in some shape and form.

That is why there is this symbol of God and divinity as ‘Integrity’ and not as ‘Belief-Faith’. There is this perception in religious registry that a religious person must have Faith in God’s existence and omnipotence as well as firm Uprightness in the righteousness associated with God. Many evolved and empowered men and women since ages have never felt the need to have faith and belief in God and divinity. True and evolved men and women accept that there is always ‘insufficient’ data to install the conviction of existence of God. It did not anyway either helped them or deterred them from the experiences of Godliness and divinity as they aligned and assimilated themselves with the spectrum of ‘Integrity and Innocence’, which is associated with the idea and idealism of divinity. They practiced the artistry and absorbed the musicality of divinity and lived out all those ideals, which are necessary to keep their consciousnesses connected and aligned with the holism of cosmic reality.

Godliness is essentially the registry of this holism of reality and living it out to experience the multidimensionality of reality. They therefore, were able to detach themselves from the slavery of rituals and externalities. They Experienced God; never ever Accepting the slavery of stupidities-hypocrisies of divinity-regime. Most people do not have this artistry and registry of reality and that is why they remain hooked to ritualism and external ‘adverts’ of reality of divinity. The same happens with love. Same also happens with almost all goodness and idealisms of human life-living. As most humans never ever understand and accept the mechanism and processes of reality and Consciousness; they simply are ignorant of the grammar of life. For them, most realities are ‘adverts’ and demonstrativeness for externalities; never the integrity of inner internalization. The poetry of living cannot happen to them. They have singular experience of ‘ritualistic externalities’ and they happily label all other novel and alternative experiences as madness and psychedelic eventualities. That is why the contemporary human world is what it is – the graveyard of dead consciousnesses. It has always been like that; only varying in degrees of intensity and expanse.

**

Example 4

When we talk of multidimensionality of experiences and their richness creating true and actual wellness of life-living; we probably cannot ignore the mention of Dreams. Most people are fascinated and even in awe of the realities of dreams. As science has not yet fully deciphered the objective causalities of dreams; it continues to be a favorite topic of discussion among men and women. Most however, are inclined to assign some element of mysticism and even spiritualism into the reality of dreams. If we look at dreams from scientific perspectives and accept the knowledge about dreams, which contemporary science has been able to hypothesize, we can have a brilliant take away from the reality of dreams.

It is now scientifically established fact that dreams are realities of the mechanisms and processes of brains. Dreams happen to animals too. This itself suggest that it has got to do with our brain states processing Information and creating some emergent shades of realities, which our conscious self does not always understand, relate to and ‘own’. Science tells us; dreams need be accepted as a marvel of our massively complex brains and its information processing. In greater probability; dreams are manifestations of the ‘internalization’ processes of all external information, which brains receives as stimuli and relates them with inventory of experiences and memories already stored in brain plexuses.

This hypothesis about dreams probably hints at the fact that dreams are the ‘landscape’ of probabilistic novel-alternative experiences, which the subconscious brain states conjure up. That is probably why; in most of our dreams, the characters and situations have familiarity with our past memories and experiences but dreams sequences them or plays them out in a way, which feels precarious, unexplainable, bizarre and even intimidating. Why? Probably because of this very fact that what we see being ‘played out’ in dreams as some reality, is so novel, so out of usual and so beyond our conscious possibilities that we either feel disoriented or fearful. However, if you sit back; rearrange the dream sequencing of situations and behavior of characters in it; you can surely admit that all these aspects are essentially ‘novelties’ of expressions and experiences of entrenched and actual realities, which you have already either lived out or are familiar with.

For example, most people see their dead relatives come alive in their dreams and trying to say something to them. In many cases, the dead coming alive in dreams, say or do something, which you either fail to decipher or find unusual. In actual world reality; we know the dead do not come back alive. However, if you look deep into the situation; you may accept that our dear dead relatives coming back to life and being with us is not some information, which our brain states do not have. This is the core desire and intense feeling of we all. The difference is that some information are there in brain states as experiences of actuality and some information are there as desires, we wish them to be true and actual. But, they are information and the brain states have them stored in some plexus of trillions of cells. We can alternatively say, if we have memories of some experiences, which are rewarding and feel-happy ones; they somehow automatically transform or are expressed in the form of wishes and desires. It is probably about Information in brain states emerging with different shades. They are ‘entangled’ realities.

Therefore, essentially, if we could accept this as some reasonably valid hypothesis; the dreams in a way tells us about the magic and marvel of how subconsciously, mixing of experiences in alternative ways make possible the emergence of something, which itself is a novel experience. Therefore, if we consciously arrange our situations and characters of self and others in alternative ways, we can engender novel experiences. What our brain states do in subconscious states, we can do better in our conscious mind states. This is a big learning from dreams. It is like; if the brains could subconsciously cook a recipe, using ingredients from its inventory, in some bizarre way, in dream domain; we can consciously use the same ingredients and cook something novel in a marvelous way!

For example, we can sit down in peace and poise and consciously imagine what our dear dead relatives would say to us or do with us if they were alive. If we live out the same experiences, in a consciously designed way, what we see in dreams subconsciously, we can have a novel field and landscape of experiences. Many evolved and empowered people do it. In any moment of life-living, when they confront a conflict situation or some precariousness; they sit down in calmness and solitude and imagine, what their close and dear one, who is no more, would expect and suggest to them. They always keep the memory and experiences of their dear dead relatives and use them to present a landscape of novel and alternative perspectives to realities. This is huge wellness platform. As we have been discussing all along, a person and his or her consciousness is a Field. The field has properties and attributes. The body of the person extends only the morphology of identity. The body goes away and the person is still identifiable by the properties and attributes of his or her field of consciousness. The fields have brilliant assimilations and integration and this is the only true and real basis of relationship between two people. The body is mortal; the field always remains as it is Information. Information is immortal; like energy.

**

Example 5

We cannot exclude the deliberation of relationship and intimacy, when we talk of the human experiences and their infinite landscape. Let us not use the term ‘Love’, which is too specific, and instead use the generic reality of relationship. As we have discussed earlier about the hypothesis of Intentionality and that too at cellular levels; we need to unravel the core reality of relationships by attempting to decipher the Cellular Intentionality of relationships and intimacy. We have already hypothesized that all human behaviors and propensities are expressions of innate and instinctive drives and drives in turn are manifestations of cellular level intentionality. It seems; the intentionality of relationships is nothing else but emergence of novel and alternative experiences. We have discussed how an individual is innately in happy state but with limited experiences and therefore not in optimal state of readiness for best of survival chances. The cellular intentionality of relationships is therefore embedded and wired in neural and hormonal landscape of experiences of feeling rewarded and nurtured. Relationships create a Field of more and better information for an individual and enhance the spectrum of experiences; which in turn optimizes its survival chances. That is why; every moving organism shall require a brain in some form or other and all brains shall be innately oriented to find utility and worth in relationships. This intentionality is cellular. Trees do not need a brain and therefore do not need relationship and intimacy, as they do not need to move. Some humans are also very much like trees; this is altogether a different domain of reality! Innately, therefore, average individual feels automatically aligned to happiness and sense of nurturing bonding in relationships. The trouble however is that contemporary humans have made a mess of the very core reality of this cellular intentionality of ‘emergence of experiences’, in most relationships. The innate and evolving harmony and rhythm are missing in relationships and therefore, there is no emergence of varieties of experiences. Instead, there is cacophony in relationships, creating a singular experience of competitiveness. We have essentially knocked off the very premise of intentionality of relationships. We do not wish to ‘grow in relationships’, energized by the fuel of novel and alternative experiences and instead; wish to bulldoze others’ experiences and install-pervade our own experience on them. There are so many reasons for modern relationships becoming a drag and stand vitiated but the core issue is we have ignored and killed the cellular intentionality of relationships and they are therefore not engendering emergence of happy and nurturing experiences.

If we analyze the contemporary reality of relationships and intimacies; we can see and visualize why emergence