Non vowel resources of some good mood by Alexander Borodin (books to get back into reading TXT) 📕

be said that you, being now fearless, could be careful, and vice versa, if you are careful, you could be fearless and not forget that this is confirmed by the facts that have already been said: it all depends on education or, if someone does not like the word “upbringing”, from the environment.

There may be several options for the development and formation of what is called your psychic constitution - depending on the time in which you were, or on the place or places of your stay during your life, and also on who you talked to: you how a personality could go in several ways - this is similar to the assertions of theoretical physicists that according to quantum physics your copies can be many, many copies in the sense that here you are doing one thing, one work, and your copies are doing other things, and life in general they have developed differently.

The second red line to keep in mind is the need for some to constantly “fiddle” with the endocrine system, which is responsible for the production of pleasure hormones by any action, both harmless and unhealthy in ways - alcohol, etc. Around the hormones of pleasure and “ human behavior revolves, it is endorphins that regulate and control human behavior, regardless of how these internal opiates are received - naturally, from any favorite occupation, or artificially, through drugs or alcohol, that is, as narcologists say, drug addicts and alcoholics enjoy pleasure without any strong-willed and intellectual efforts, that is, if higher powers give pleasant things only for something, then some want endorphins to be brought to them "Saucer".

If all those human qualities, which will be discussed below, disappear only, for example, after 40 years of a person’s life - is it a delay in mental development or what is called infantilism - eternal childhood? Is an adult when all that is considered weaknesses in modern society disappears? A sign of adulthood in the modern sense is autonomy, independence from someone and from anything, for example, the absence of an uncomfortable psychological state in the absence of friends, the lack of emotional attachment to someone or anything, and so on in this sense? It’s normal to feel psychologically uncomfortable in some cases, because if everyone felt psychologically comfortable, then if we take into account the sexual factor, then no one would reproduce, and almost everyone without the opposite sex has discomfort, which is expressed in different degrees for everyone - Is it not a mobile (stable) psyche only for single people, for example, for the same astronauts? The average person - how does he differ from the non-average person, and what is the psychological portrait of both? The struggle for males and females - some do not take part in it, since they sincerely do not need and are not interested, are they all different? Units are not subject to what is called propaganda? Propaganda is a quiet weapon - it’s easier to deceive a crowd than one person, does the criticality to one’s and others ’actions turn off in the crowd? When an investigator invites a minor child to investigate, the boss sometimes tells him “Work with him (with the minor)” - we extrapolate this into civilian life. Work with him (inspire) - with your husband, wife for a harmonious relationship? Propaganda propaganda - those who do it do it so that their refrigerator is full, and you watch not in the TV, but in the refrigerator: for some, the main thing is their economic assets? Cosmonauts and IT specialists do not spend time on emotional experiences, such as fear, love, aggression, sexual desires - since they do not have them in such volume as the majority, which gives them the opportunity to do what they do - their work and the implementation of those tasks that most will not cope with? According to the films about the training of astronauts, the people who are preparing to be sent to space are put into enclosed space for several weeks and watch them how they endure their deprivation of liberty, if someone has a “roof” from unfulfilled desires, so there’s one conclusion : no desires - no psychological problems from the impossibility of their implementation? There is not what is called weakness of spirit - are there people whom the majority and who are ordered by higher powers to have what are called weaknesses, for example, the instinct of reproduction? If everyone was like astronauts, that is, without what is considered to be weaknesses, and could restrain their sexual instincts, or if they were almost absent, who would multiply then - with higher powers everything is thought out in advance, there are no weak and strong ones in spirit, there are those , to whom one is prescribed, and those to whom the other is prescribed? Do not envy anyone, for it is written in the Gospel - to whom much has been given, much will be asked? Cosmonauts are those who don’t need what the majority needs, that is, they don’t have what they call weaknesses or their minimum — do the astronauts have no cognitive dissonance? Someone’s torment is when this someone does not do what the higher forces want from him? PSOG (psychologically healthy lifestyle) is the knowledge of the ways that you need to go to achieve the tasks set by higher forces, for example, higher forces tell you in a hormonal way that you need some person of the opposite sex, but you don’t know how to approach him, and you are already unhappy - an unfortunate one who does not do what higher powers say to him? Cognitive dissonance is when there are several tasks, and you don’t know which one to perform, and also when there are several ways to solve problems, and you don’t know which way to choose: there is a basic law (constitution), there are simply laws that should not contradict the basic law (constitution) - can this be brought to life? Most people, as a rule, think about the bad, criticize themselves - do I have an ugly nose, ears, eyes, body, etc.?

The most commonplace questions we are asked are “How do you manage in space without vodka and women?”

Cosmonaut Sergey Ryazansky.

The title of the material, “The Unspoken Resources of the Good Mood of Some,” could have continued: “... for those who have the needs of an average person or average person ...”. (By the definition of "average person" the author means only the way of life inherent in some people, nothing else is meant by the term "average person" - he does not mean the intellect of a person, his level of income, etc., etc.)

Unspoken, not because they are forbidden to voice them, or it is decided to popularize the work with this name, but because not everyone voices them, not everyone uses them, and not everyone knows them. Why this happens and who does not voice them, does not use and does not know, is considered in this book.

If you start from school, some can be distinguished by the fact that they do not have or are present, but not in full, the qualities that others possess - while everyone is at school, there are those whose studies dominate other interests, they are rare either they don’t meet with the opposite sex at all, rarely or never at street companies.

Probably, each person should either suppress or fulfill their needs, with age they can go away on their own: as they say, he “outgrows” them or he’s “gone crazy” - if everything goes smoothly from the point of view of modern psychology and sociology. Some of them remove their needs for companies and disappear, like a lizard’s tail, other needs, which are also called weaknesses, in the end they are equalized with those who did not need companies at school, that is, the needs of some of them become minimal, but they they already lost time by spending it on the satisfaction of their desires, not related to study and education, and, therefore, they did not receive the knowledge that was obtained in educational institutions by someone who did not have what is called weaknesses. What is considered weaknesses makes it difficult to concentrate on learning?

There are non-emotional people (such as people of the exact sciences, pilots, astronauts, IT specialists, military personnel of special forces, doctors with their medical cynicism - in any case, their professions provide for the absence of what are called weaknesses), which, as a rule, are completely independent from their emotions, they don’t have them at all, or if there are, then at least there are those who are included in the category of emotional people (among them, as a rule, humanities and not only), it is precisely such people who usually have a lot of problems related to emotions, as they say - eople art sometimes dramatize the situation, but to live with especially difficult creative.

The astronauts are probably the most controlled people who can cope with any task, those who can do what they are told: say they need to lose weight - lose weight, are ordered to sit in isolation for months - will be in isolation, ordered to expose life of danger - they will endanger life, and also these are people who can be deprived of pain for a long time, people with a minimum of needs. What does it say? To the fact that everyone can find out how much he is able to carry out those tasks that are performed by those who are called strong spirit, for example, someone tried to lose weight, but failed, and some are capable of it.

A person with the psyche of an astronaut or almost like an astronaut has complete psychological comfort, because he does not have emotional needs or they have, but in the smallest amount, some people have a psychologically stable state only when they satisfy their instincts and needs, and here there comes a time when some do not know how to satisfy their emotional, and psychological stability because of this does not occur at all, or the emotional component is satisfied by methods dangerous to the carrier of emotions and for those around him.

What if ordinary classical psychology doesn’t help some or doesn’t help some? There is not only legal, but also psychological illiteracy? Sometimes when shooting a stuntman’s film, when he does his job, they will be replaced by those who are called a sugary guy who is afraid of everything that is associated with risk during the filming, and he will continue to act as the main character - this is a life consisting of the present and fake? All that is needed for the triumph of evil is that good people do nothing, and what is good and bad in general, and can everything be good at all or when someone is good, is it because of this someone is bad? Can life be made better only at the expense of others? What do “winged” phrases mean — truth, or an attempt at what is called manipulation by someone, or something else? The main troubles of an emotional person are unconstructive fear, aggression and other emotions, as well as the inability to adequately respond to psychological and other aggression and ignorance of acceptable and effective ways to satisfy psychological needs? It is necessary for everyone to feel good, and not for the minority or the majority, if you think that you have decided to help people in need, but how can this be done? You walk along the street and see a drunk and dirty person lying on the ground - if you have “overvalued” ideas about the perfection of society, then try to help someone who is drunk to get home and only then will you understand if your reasoning has weight or is it just the demagogy of an ambitious person, start small, and then think about big? What is stress - is it when they have done what is called an insult towards you, and you did not say anything, and it gnaws at you? Are there truths that people don’t want to see and that they don’t want to