Essays On Education And Kindred Subjects (Fiscle Part- 11) by Herbert Spencer (best fiction novels to read TXT) π
The Four Chapters Of Which This Work Consists, Originally Appeared As
Four Review-Articles: The First In The _Westminster Review_ For July
1859; The Second In The _North British Review_ For May 1854; And The
Remaining Two In The _British Quarterly Review_ For April 1858 And For
April 1859. Severally Treating Different Divisions Of The Subject, But
Together Forming A Tolerably Complete Whole, I Originally Wrote Them
With A View To Their Republication In A United Form; And They Would Some
Time Since Have Thus Been Issued, Had Not A Legal Difficulty Stood In
The Way. This Difficulty Being Now Removed, I Hasten To Fulfil The
Intention With Which They Were Written.
That In Their First Shape These Chapters Were Severally Independent, Is
The Reason To Be Assigned For Some Slight Repetitions Which Occur In
Them: One Leading Idea, More Especially, Reappearing Twice. As, However,
This Idea Is On Each Occasion Presented Under A New Form, And As It Can
Scarcely Be Too Much Enforced, I Have Not Thought Well To Omit Any Of
The Passages Embodying It.
Read free book Β«Essays On Education And Kindred Subjects (Fiscle Part- 11) by Herbert Spencer (best fiction novels to read TXT) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Herbert Spencer
Read book online Β«Essays On Education And Kindred Subjects (Fiscle Part- 11) by Herbert Spencer (best fiction novels to read TXT) πΒ». Author - Herbert Spencer
Not Find Some Men Ready To Bow To Established Authority Of Whatever
Kind; While Others Demand Of Every Such Authority Its Reason, And Reject
It If It Fails To Justify Itself? And Must Not The Minds Thus Contrasted
Tend To Become Respectively Conformist And Nonconformist, Not Only In
Politics And Religion, But In Other Things? Submission, Whether To A
Government, To The Dogmas Of Ecclesiastics, Or To That Code Of Behaviour
Which Society At Large Has Set Up, Is Essentially Of The Same Nature;
And The Sentiment Which Induces Resistance To The Despotism Of Rulers,
Civil Or Spiritual, Likewise Induces Resistance To The Despotism Of The
World's Opinion. Look At Them Fundamentally, And All Enactments, Alike
Of The Legislature, The Consistory, And The Saloon--All Regulations,
Formal Or Virtual, Have A Common Character: They Are All Limitations Of
Men's Freedom. "Do This--Refrain From That," Are The Blank Formulas Into
Which They May All Be Written: And In Each Case The Understanding Is
That Obedience Will Bring Approbation Here And Paradise Hereafter; While
Disobedience Will Entail Imprisonment, Or Sending To Coventry, Or
Eternal Torments, As The Case May Be. And If Restraints, However Named,
And Through Whatever Apparatus Of Means Exercised, Are One In Their
Action Upon Men, It Must Happen That Those Who Are Patient Under One
Kind Of Restraint, Are Likely To Be Patient Under Another; And
Conversely, That Those Impatient Of Restraint In General, Will, On The
Average, Tend To Show Their Impatience In All Directions.
That Law, Religion, And Manners Are Thus Related--That Their Respective
Kinds Of Operation Come Under One Generalisation--That They Have In
Certain Contrasted Characteristics Of Men A Common Support And A Common
Danger--Will, However, Be Most Clearly Seen On Discovering That They
Have A Common Origin. Little As From Present Appearances We Should
Suppose It, We Shall Yet Find That At First, The Control Of Religion,
The Control Of Laws And The Control Of Manners, Were All One Control.
However Incredible It May Now Seem, We Believe It To Be Demonstrable
That The Rules Of Etiquette, The Provisions Of The Statute-Book, And The
Commands Of The Decalogue, Have Grown From The Same Root. If We Go Far
Enough Back Into The Ages Of Primeval Fetishism, It Becomes Manifest
That Originally Deity, Chief, And Master Of The Ceremonies Were
Identical. To Make Good These Positions, And To Show Their Bearing On
What Is To Follow, It Will Be Necessary Here To Traverse Ground That Is
In Part Somewhat Beaten, And At First Sight Irrelevant To Our Topic. We
Will Pass Over It As Quickly As Consists With The Exigencies Of The
Argument.
That The Earliest Social Aggregations Were Ruled Solely By The Will Of
The Strong Man, Few Dispute. That From The Strong Man Proceeded Not Only
Monarchy, But The Conception Of A God, Few Admit: Much As Carlyle And
Others Have Said In Evidence Of It. If, However, Those Who Are Unable To
Believe This, Will Lay Aside The Ideas Of God And Man In Which They Have
Been Educated, And Study The Aboriginal Ideas Of Them, They Will At
Least See Some Probability In The Hypothesis. Let Them Remember That
Before Experience Had Yet Taught Men To Distinguish Between The Possible
And The Impossible; And While They Were Ready On The Slightest
Suggestion To Ascribe Unknown Powers To Any Object And Make A Fetish Of
It; Their Conceptions Of Humanity And Its Capacities Were Necessarily
Vague, And Without Specific Limits. The Man Who By Unusual Strength, Or
Cunning, Achieved Something That Others Had Failed To Achieve, Or
Something Which They Did Not Understand, Was Considered By Them As
Differing From Themselves; And, As We See In The Belief Of Some
Polynesians That Only Their Chiefs Have Souls, Or In That Of The Ancient
Peruvians That Their Nobles Were Divine By Birth, The Ascribed
Difference Was Apt To Be Not One Of Degree Only, But One Of Kind.
Let Them Remember Next, How Gross Were The Notions Of God, Or Rather Of
Gods, Prevalent During The Same Era And Afterwards--How Concretely Gods
Were Conceived As Men Of Specific Aspects Dressed In Specific Ways--How
Their Names Were Literally "The Strong," "The Destroyer," "The Powerful
One,"--How, According To The Scandinavian Mythology, The "Sacred Duty Of
Blood-Revenge" Was Acted On By The Gods Themselves,--And How They Were
Not Only Human In Their Vindictiveness, Their Cruelty, And Their
Quarrels With Each Other, But Were Supposed To Have Amours On Earth, And
To Consume The Viands Placed On Their Altars. Add To Which, That In
Various Mythologies, Greek, Scandinavian, And Others, The Oldest Beings
Are Giants; That According To A Traditional Genealogy The Gods,
Demi-Gods, And In Some Cases Men, Are Descended From These After The
Human Fashion; And That While In The East We Hear Of Sons Of God Who Saw
The Daughters Of Men That They Were Fair, The Teutonic Myths Tell Of
Unions Between The Sons Of Men And The Daughters Of The Gods.
Let Them Remember, Too, That At First The Idea Of Death Differed Widely
From That Which We Have; That There Are Still Tribes Who, On The Decease
Of One Of Their Number, Attempt To Make The Corpse Stand, And Put Food
Into His Mouth; That The Peruvians Had Feasts At Which The Mummies Of
Their Dead Incas Presided, When, As Prescott Says, They Paid Attention
"To These Insensible Remains As If They Were Instinct With Life;" That
Among The Fejees It Is Believed That Every Enemy Has To Be Killed Twice;
That The Eastern Pagans Give Extension And Figure To The Soul, And
Attribute To It All The Same Substances, Both Solid And Liquid, Of Which
Our Bodies Are Composed; And That It Is The Custom Among Most Barbarous
Races To Bury Food, Weapons, And Trinkets Along With The Dead Body,
Under The Manifest Belief That It Will Presently Need Them.
Lastly, Let Them Remember That The Other World, As Originally Conceived,
Is Simply Some Distant Part Of This World--Some Elysian Fields, Some
Happy Hunting-Ground, Accessible Even To The Living, And To Which, After
Death, Men Travel In Anticipation Of A Life Analogous In General
Character To That Which They Led Before. Then, Co-Ordinating These
General Facts--The Ascription Of Unknown Powers To Chiefs And Medicine
Men; The Belief In Deities Having Human Forms, Passions, And Behaviour;
The Imperfect Comprehension Of Death As Distinguished From Life; And The
Proximity Of The Future Abode To The Present, Both In Position And
Character--Let Them Reflect Whether They Do Not Almost Unavoidably
Part 2 Chapter 2 (On Manners And Fashion) Pg 83
Suggest The Conclusion That The Aboriginal God Is The Dead Chief; The
Chief Not Dead In Our Sense, But Gone Away Carrying With Him Food And
Weapons To Some Rumoured Region Of Plenty, Some Promised Land, Whither
He Had Long Intended To Lead His Followers, And Whence He Will Presently
Return To Fetch Them.
This Hypothesis Once Entertained, Is Seen To Harmonise With All
Primitive Ideas And Practices. The Sons Of The Deified Chief Reigning
After Him, It Necessarily Happens That All Early Kings Are Held
Descendants Of The Gods; And The Fact That Alike In Assyria, Egypt,
Among The Jews, Phoenicians, And Ancient Britons, Kings' Names Were
Formed Out Of The Names Of The Gods, Is Fully Explained. The Genesis Of
Polytheism Out Of Fetishism, By The Successive Migrations Of The Race Of
God-Kings To The Other World--A Genesis Illustrated In The Greek
Mythology, Alike By The Precise Genealogy Of The Deities, And By The
Specifically Asserted Apotheosis Of The Later Ones--Tends Further To
Bear It Out. It Explains The Fact That In The Old Creeds, As In The
Still Extant Creed Of The Otaheitans, Every Family Has Its Guardian
Spirit, Who Is Supposed To Be One Of Their Departed Relatives; And That
They Sacrifice To These As Minor Gods--A Practice Still Pursued By The
Chinese And Even By The Russians. It Is Perfectly Congruous With The
Grecian Myths Concerning The Wars Of The Gods With The Titans And Their
Final Usurpation; And It Similarly Agrees With The Fact That Among The
Teutonic Gods Proper Was One Freir Who Came Among Them By Adoption, "But
Was Born Among The _Vanes_, A Somewhat Mysterious _Other_ Dynasty Of
Gods, Who Had Been Conquered And Superseded By The Stronger And More
Warlike Odin Dynasty." It Harmonises, Too, With The Belief That There
Are Different Gods To Different Territories And Nations, As There Were
Different Chiefs; That These Gods Contend For Supremacy As Chiefs Do;
And It Gives Meaning To The Boast Of Neighbouring Tribes--"Our God Is
Greater Than Your God." It Is Confirmed By The Notion Universally
Current In Early Times, That The Gods Come From This Other Abode, In
Which They Commonly Live, And Appear Among Men--Speak To Them, Help
Them, Punish Them. And Remembering This, It Becomes Manifest That The
Prayers Put Up By Primitive Peoples To Their Gods For Aid In Battle, Are
Meant Literally--That Their Gods Are Expected To Come Back From The
Other Kingdom They Are Reigning Over, And Once More Fight The Old
Enemies They Had Before Warred Against So Implacably; And It Needs But
To Name The Iliad, To Remind Every One How Thoroughly They Believed The
Expectation Fulfilled.
All Government, Then, Being Originally That Of The Strong Man Who Has
Become A Fetish By Some Manifestation Of Superiority, There Arises, At
His Death--His Supposed Departure On A Long Projected Expedition, In
Which He Is Accompanied By His Slaves And Concubines Sacrificed At His
Tomb--Their Arises, Then, The Incipient Division Of Religious From
Political Control, Of Civil Rule From Spiritual. His Son Becomes Deputed
Chief During His Absence; His Authority Is Cited As That By Which His
Son Acts; His Vengeance Is Invoked On All Who Disobey His Son; And His
Commands, As Previously Known Or As Asserted By His Son, Become The Germ
Of A Moral Code; A Fact We Shall The More Clearly Perceive If We
Remember, That Early Moral Codes Inculcate Mainly The Virtues Of The
Warrior, And The Duty Of Exterminating Some Neighbouring Tribe Whose
Existence Is An Offence To The Deity.
From This Point Onwards, These Two Kinds Of Authority, At First
Complicated Together As Those Of Principal And Agent, Become Slowly More
And More Distinct. As Experience Accumulates, And Ideas Of Causation
Grow More Precise, Kings Lose Their Supernatural Attributes; And,
Instead Of God-King, Become God-Descended King, God-Appointed King, The
Lord's Anointed, The Vicegerent Of Heaven, Ruler Reigning By Divine
Right. The Old Theory, However, Long Clings To Men In Feeling, After It
Has Disappeared In Name; And "Such Divinity Doth Hedge A King," That
Even Now, Many, On First Seeing One, Feel A Secret Surprise At Finding
Him An Ordinary Sample Of Humanity. The Sacredness Attaching To Royalty
Attaches Afterwards To Its Appended Institutions--To Legislatures, To
Laws. Legal And Illegal Are Synonymous With Right And Wrong; The
Authority Of Parliament Is Held Unlimited; And A Lingering Faith In
Governmental Power Continually Generates Unfounded Hopes From Its
Enactments. Political Scepticism, However, Having Destroyed The Divine
_Prestige_ Of Royalty, Goes On Ever Increasing, And Promises Ultimately
To Reduce The State To A Purely Secular Institution, Whose Regulations
Are Limited In Their Sphere, And Have No Other Authority Than The
General Will. Meanwhile, The Religious Control Has Been Little By Little
Separating Itself From The Civil, Both In Its Essence And In Its Forms.
While From The God-King Of The Savage Have Arisen In One Direction,
Secular Rulers Who, Age By Age, Have Been Losing The Sacred Attributes
Men Ascribed To Them; There Has Arisen In Another Direction, The
Conception Of A Deity, Who, At First Human In All Things, Has Been
Gradually Losing Human Materiality, Human Form, Human Passions, Human
Modes Of Action: Until Now, Anthropomorphism Has Become A Reproach.
Along With This Wide Divergence In Men's Ideas Of The Divine And Civil
Ruler Has Been Taking Place A Corresponding Divergence In The Codes Of
Conduct Respectively Proceeding From Them. While The King Was A
Deputy-God--A Governor Such As The Jews Looked For In The Messiah--A
Governor Considered, As The Czar Still Is, "Our God Upon Earth,"--It, Of
Course, Followed That His Commands Were The Supreme Rules. But As Men
Ceased To Believe In His Supernatural Origin And Nature, His Commands
Ceased To Be The Highest; And There
Comments (0)