Unconscious Memory(Fiscle Part-3) by Samuel Butler (classic books to read .TXT) π
Time The "Origin Of Species" Was Published In 1859.
There Are Few Things Which Strike Us With More Surprise, When We
Review The Course Taken By Opinion In The Last Century, Than The
Suddenness With Which Belief In Witchcraft And Demoniacal Possession
Came To An End.
Read free book Β«Unconscious Memory(Fiscle Part-3) by Samuel Butler (classic books to read .TXT) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Samuel Butler
Read book online Β«Unconscious Memory(Fiscle Part-3) by Samuel Butler (classic books to read .TXT) πΒ». Author - Samuel Butler
May Be Considering. As A Complicated Perception May Arise By Means
Of A Rapid And Superficial Reproduction Of Long And Laboriously
Practised Brain Processes, So A Germ In The Course Of Its Development
Hurries Through A Series Of Phases, Hinting At Them Only. Often And
Long Foreshadowed In Theories Of Varied Characters, This Conception
Has Only Now Found Correct Exposition From A Naturalist Of Our Own
Time. {81} For Truth Hides Herself Under Many Disguises From Those
Who Seek Her, But In The End Stands Unveiled Before The Eyes Of Him
Whom She Has Chosen.
Not Only Is There A Reproduction Of Form, Outward And Inner
Conformation Of Body, Organs, And Cells, But The Habitual Actions Of
The Parent Are Also Reproduced. The Chicken On Emerging From The
Eggshell Runs Off As Its Mother Ran Off Before It; Yet What An
Extraordinary Complication Of Emotions And Sensations Is Necessary In
Order To Preserve Equilibrium In Running. Surely The Supposition Of
An Inborn Capacity For The Reproduction Of These Intricate Actions
Can Alone Explain The Facts. As Habitual Practice Becomes A Second
Nature To The Individual During His Single Lifetime, So The Often-
Repeated Action Of Each Generation Becomes A Second Nature To The
Race.
The Chicken Not Only Displays Great Dexterity In The Performance Of
Movements For The Effecting Of Which It Has An Innate Capacity, But
It Exhibits Also A Tolerably High Perceptive Power. It Immediately
Picks Up Any Grain That May Be Thrown To It. Yet, In Order To Do
This, More Is Wanted Than A Mere Visual Perception Of The Grains;
There Must Be An Accurate Apprehension Of The Direction And Distance
Of The Precise Spot In Which Each Grain Is Lying, And There Must Be
No Less Accuracy In The Adjustment Of The Movements Of The Head And
Of The Whole Body. The Chicken Cannot Have Gained Experience In
These Respects While It Was Still In The Egg. It Gained It Rather
From The Thousands Of Thousands Of Beings That Have Lived Before It,
And From Which It Is Directly Descended.
The Memory Of Organised Substance Displays Itself Here In The Most
Surprising Fashion. The Gentle Stimulus Of The Light Proceeding From
The Grain That Affects The Retina Of The Chicken, {82} Gives Occasion
For The Reproduction Of A Many-Linked Chain Of Sensations,
Perceptions, And Emotions, Which Were Never Yet Brought Together In
The Case Of The Individual Before Us. We Are Accustomed To Regard
These Surprising Performances Of Animals As Manifestations Of What We
Call Instinct, And The Mysticism Of Natural Philosophy Has Ever Shown
A Predilection For This Theme; But If We Regard Instinct As The
Outcome Of The Memory Or Reproductive Power Of Organised Substance,
And If We Ascribe A Memory To The Race As We Already Ascribe It To
The Individual, Then Instinct Becomes At Once Intelligible, And The
Physiologist At The Same Time Finds A Point Of Contact Which Will
Bring It Into Connection With The Great Series Of Facts Indicated
Above As Phenomena Of The Reproductive Faculty. Here, Then, We Have
A Physical Explanation Which Has Not, Indeed, Been Given Yet, But The
Time For Which Appears To Be Rapidly Approaching.
When, In Accordance With Its Instinct, The Caterpillar Becomes A
Chapter 6 Pg 79Chrysalis, Or The Bird Builds Its Nest, Or The Bee Its Cell, These
Creatures Act Consciously And Not As Blind Machines. They Know How
To Vary Their Proceedings Within Certain Limits In Conformity With
Altered Circumstances, And They Are Thus Liable To Make Mistakes.
They Feel Pleasure When Their Work Advances And Pain If It Is
Hindered; They Learn By The Experience Thus Acquired, And Build On A
Second Occasion Better Than On The First; But That Even In The Outset
They Hit So Readily Upon The Most Judicious Way Of Achieving Their
Purpose, And That Their Movements Adapt Themselves So Admirably And
Automatically To The End They Have In View--Surely This Is Owing To
The Inherited Acquisitions Of The Memory Of Their Nerve Substance,
Which Requires But A Touch And It Will Fall At Once To The Most
Appropriate Kind Of Activity, Thinking Always, And Directly, Of
Whatever It Is That May Be Wanted.
Man Can Readily Acquire Surprising Kinds Of Dexterity If He Confines
His Attention To Their Acquisition. Specialisation Is The Mother Of
Proficiency. He Who Marvels At The Skill With Which The Spider
Weaves Her Web Should Bear In Mind That She Did Not Learn Her Art All
On A Sudden, But That Innumerable Generations Of Spiders Acquired It
Toilsomely And Step By Step--This Being About All That, As A General
Rule, They Did Acquire. Man Took To Bows And Arrows If His Nets
Failed Him--The Spider Starved. Thus We See The Body And--What Most
Concerns Us--The Whole Nervous System Of The New-Born Animal
Constructed Beforehand, And, As It Were, Ready Attuned For
Intercourse With The Outside World In Which It Is About To Play Its
Part, By Means Of Its Tendency To Respond To External Stimuli In The
Same Manner As It Has Often Heretofore Responded In The Persons Of
Its Ancestors.
We Naturally Ask Whether The Brain And Nervous System Of The Human
Infant Are Subjected To The Principles We Have Laid Down Above? Man
Certainly Finds It Difficult To Acquire Arts Of Which The Lower
Animals Are Born Masters; But The Brain Of Man At Birth Is Much
Farther From Its Highest Development Than Is The Brain Of An Animal.
It Not Only Grows For A Longer Time, But It Becomes Stronger Than
That Of Other Living Beings. The Brain Of Man May Be Said To Be
Exceptionally Young At Birth. The Lower Animal Is Born Precocious,
And Acts Precociously; It Resembles Those Infant Prodigies Whose
Brain, As It Were, Is Born Old Into The World, But Who, In Spite Of,
Or Rather In Addition To, Their Rich Endowment At Birth, In After
Life Develop As Much Mental Power As Others Who Were Less Splendidly
Furnished To Start With, But Born With Greater Freshness Of Youth.
Man's Brain, And Indeed His Whole Body, Affords Greater Scope For
Individuality, Inasmuch As A Relatively Greater Part Of It Is Of
Post-Natal Growth. It Develops Under The Influence Of Impressions
Made By The Environment Upon Its Senses, And Thus Makes Its
Acquisitions In A More Special And Individual Manner, Whereas The
Animal Receives Them Ready Made, And Of A More Final, Stereotyped
Character.
Nevertheless, It Is Plain We Must Ascribe Both To The Brain And Body
Of The New-Born Infant A Far-Reaching Power Of Remembering Or
Reproducing Things Which Have Already Come To Their Development
Chapter 6 Pg 80Thousands Of Times Over In The Persons Of Its Ancestors. It Is In
Virtue Of This That It Acquires Proficiency In The Actions Necessary
For Its Existence--So Far As It Was Not Already At Birth Proficient
In Them--Much More Quickly And Easily Than Would Be Otherwise
Possible; But What We Call Instinct In The Case Of Animals Takes In
Man The Looser Form Of Aptitude, Talent, And Genius. {84} Granted
That Certain Ideas Are Not Innate, Yet The Fact Of Their Taking Form
So Easily And Certainly From Out Of The Chaos Of His Sensations, Is
Due Not To His Own Labour, But To That Of The Brain Substance Of The
Thousands Of Thousands Of Generations From Whom He Is Descended.
Theories Concerning The Development Of Individual Consciousness Which
Deny Heredity Or The Power Of Transmission, And Insist Upon An
Entirely Fresh Start For Every Human Soul, As Though The Infinite
Number Of Generations That Have Gone Before Us Might As Well Have
Never Lived For All The Effect They Have Had Upon Ourselves,--Such
Theories Will Contradict The Facts Of Our Daily Experience At Every
Touch And Turn.
The Brain Processes And Phenomena Of Consciousness Which Ennoble Man
In The Eyes Of His Fellows Have Had A Less Ancient History Than Those
Connected With His Physical Needs. Hunger And The Reproductive
Instinct Affected The Oldest And Simplest Forms Of The Organic World.
It Is In Respect Of These Instincts, Therefore, And Of The Means To
Gratify Them, That The Memory Of Organised Substance Is Strongest--
The Impulses And Instincts That Arise Hence Having Still Paramount
Power Over The Minds Of Men. The Spiritual Life Has Been Superadded
Slowly; Its Most Splendid Outcome Belongs To The Latest Epoch In The
History Of Organised Matter, Nor Has Any Very Great Length Of Time
Elapsed Since The Nervous System Was First Crowned With The Glory Of
A Large And Well-Developed Brain.
Oral Tradition And Written History Have Been Called The Memory Of
Man, And This Is Not Without Its Truth. But There Is Another And A
Living Memory In The Innate Reproductive Power Of Brain Substance,
And Without This Both Writings And Oral Tradition Would Be Without
Significance To Posterity. The Most Sublime Ideas, Though Never So
Immortalised In Speech Or Letters, Are Yet Nothing For Heads That Are
Out Of Harmony With Them; They Must Be Not Only Heard, But
Reproduced; And Both Speech And Writing Would Be In Vain Were There
Not An Inheritance Of Inward And Outward Brain Development, Growing
In Correspondence With The Inheritance Of Ideas That Are Handed Down
From Age To Age, And Did Not An Enhanced Capacity For Their
Reproduction On The Part Of Each Succeeding Generation Accompany The
Thoughts That Have Been Preserved In Writing. Man's Conscious Memory
Comes To An End At Death, But The Unconscious Memory Of Nature Is
True And Ineradicable: Whoever Succeeds In Stamping Upon Her The
Impress Of His Work, She Will Remember Him To The End Of Time.
Chapter 7 Pg 81
Introduction To A Translation Of The Chapter Upon Instinct In Von
Hartmann's "Philosophy Of The Unconscious."
I Am Afraid My Readers Will Find The Chapter On Instinct From Von
Hartmann's "Philosophy Of The Unconscious," Which Will Now Follow, As
Distasteful To Read As I Did To Translate, And Would Gladly Have
Spared It Them If I Could. At Present, The Works Of Mr. Sully, Who
Has Treated Of The "Philosophy Of The Unconscious" Both In The
Westminster Review (Vol. Xlix. N.S.) And In His Work "Pessimism," Are
The Best Source To Which English Readers Can Have Recourse For
Information Concerning Von Hartmann. Giving Him All Credit For The
Pains He Has Taken With An Ungrateful, If Not Impossible Subject, I
Think That A Sufficient Sample Of Von Hartmann's Own Words Will Be A
Useful Adjunct To Mr. Sully's Work, And May Perhaps Save Some Readers
Trouble By Resolving Them To Look
Comments (0)