A Short History of Astronomy by Arthur Berry (best novels for students .TXT) π
Read free book Β«A Short History of Astronomy by Arthur Berry (best novels for students .TXT) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Arthur Berry
- Performer: -
Read book online Β«A Short History of Astronomy by Arthur Berry (best novels for students .TXT) πΒ». Author - Arthur Berry
Again, the motion of the moon, like that of the sun, is not uniform, the variations being greater than in the case of the sun. Hipparchus appears to have been the first to discover that the part of the moonβs path in which the motion is most rapid is not always in the same position on the celestial sphere, but moves continuously; or, in other words, that the line of apses (Β§ 39) of the moonβs path moves. The motion is an advance, and a complete circuit is described in about nine years. Hence arises a fourth kind of month, the anomalistic month, which is the period in which the moon returns to apogee or perigee.
To Hipparchus is due the credit of fixing with greater exactitude than before the lengths of each of these months. In order to determine them with accuracy he recognised the importance of comparing observations of the moon taken at as great a distance of time as possible, and saw that the most satisfactory results could be obtained by using Chaldaean and other eclipse observations, which, as eclipses only take place near the moonβs nodes, were simultaneous records of the position of the moon, the nodes, and the sun.
To represent this complicated set of motions, Hipparchus used, as in the case of the sun, an eccentric, the centre of which described a circle round the earth in about nine years (corresponding to the motion of the apses), the plane of the eccentric being inclined to the ecliptic at an angle of 5Β°, and sliding back, so as to represent the motion of the nodes already described.
The result cannot, however, have been as satisfactory as in the case of the sun. The variation in the rate at which the moon moves is not only greater than in the case of the sun, but follows a less simple law, and cannot be adequately represented by means of a single eccentric; so that though Hipparchusβ work would have represented the motion of the moon in certain parts of her orbit with fair accuracy, there must necessarily have been elsewhere discrepancies between the calculated and observed places. There is some indication that Hipparchus was aware of these, but was not able to reconstruct his theory so as to account for them.
41. In the case of the planets Hipparchus found so small a supply of satisfactory observations by his predecessors, that he made no attempt to construct a system of epicycles or eccentrics to represent their motion, but collected fresh observations for the use of his successors. He also made use of these observations to determine with more accuracy than before the average times of revolution of the several planets.
He also made a satisfactory estimate of the size and distance of the moon, by an eclipse method, the leading idea of which was due to Aristarchus (Β§ 32); by observing the angular diameter of the earthβs shadow (Q R) at the distance of the moon at the time of an eclipse, and comparing it with the known angular diameters of the sun and moon, he obtained, by a simple calculation,25 a relation between the distances of the sun and moon, which gives either when the other is known. Hipparchus knew that the sun was very much more distant than the moon, and appears to have tried more than one distance, that of Aristarchus among them, and the result obtained in each case shewed that the distance of the moon was nearly 59 times the radius of the earth. Combining the estimates of Hipparchus and Aristarchus, we find the distance of the sun to be about 1,200 times the radius of the earthβa number which remained substantially unchanged for many centuries (chapter VIII., Β§ 161).
42. The appearance in 134 B.C. of a new star in the Scorpion is said to have suggested to Hipparchus the construction of a new catalogue of the stars. He included 1,080 stars, and not only gave the (celestial) latitude and longitude of each star, but divided them according to their brightness into six magnitudes. The constellations to which he refers are nearly identical with those of Eudoxus (Β§ 26), and the list has undergone few alterations up to the present day, except for the addition of a number of southern constellations, invisible in the civilised countries of the ancient world. Hipparchus recorded also a number of cases in which three or more stars appeared to be in line with one another, or, more exactly, lay on the same great circle, his object being to enable subsequent observers to detect more easily possible changes in the positions of the stars. The catalogue remained, with slight alterations, the standard one for nearly sixteen centuries (cf. chapter III., Β§ 63).
The construction of this catalogue led to a notable discovery, the best known probably of all those which Hipparchus made. In comparing his observations of certain stars with those of Timocharis and Aristyllus (Β§ 33), made about a century and a half earlier, Hipparchus found that their distances from the equinoctial points had changed. Thus, in the case of the bright star Spica, the distance from the equinoctial points (measured eastwards) had increased by about 2Β° in 150 years, or at the rate of 48β³ per annum. Further inquiry showed that, though the roughness of the observations produced considerable variations in the case of different stars, there was evidence of a general increase in the longitude of the stars (measured from west to east), unaccompanied by any change of latitude, the amount of the change being estimated by Hipparchus as at least 36β³ annually, and possibly more. The agreement between the motions of different stars was enough to justify him in concluding that the change could be accounted for, not as a motion of individual stars, but rather as a change in the position of the equinoctial points, from which longitudes were measured. Now these points are the intersection of the equator and the ecliptic: consequently one or another of these two circles must have changed. But the fact that the latitudes of the stars had undergone no change shewed that the ecliptic must have retained its position and that the change had been caused by a motion of the equator. Again, Hipparchus measured the obliquity of the ecliptic as several of his predecessors had done, and the results indicated no appreciable change. Hipparchus accordingly inferred that the equator was, as it were, slowly sliding backwards (i.e. from east to west), keeping a constant inclination to the ecliptic.
The argument may be made clearer by figures. In fig. 21 let β M denote the ecliptic, β N the equator, S a star as seen by Timocharis, S M a great circle drawn perpendicular to the ecliptic. Then S M is the latitude, β M the longitude. Let Sβ² denote the star as seen by Hipparchus; then he found, that Sβ² M was equal to the former S M, but that β Mβ² was greater than the former β M, or that Mβ² was slightly to the east of M. This change M Mβ² being nearly the same for all stars, it was simpler to attribute it to an equal motion in the opposite direction of the point β, say from β to ββ² (fig. 22), i.e. by a motion of the equator from β N to ββ² Nβ², its inclination Nβ² ββ² M remaining equal to its former amount N β M. The general effect of this change is shewn in a different way in fig. 23, where β ββ² β ββ² being the ecliptic, A B C D represents the equator as it appeared in the time of Timocharis, Aβ² Bβ² Cβ² Dβ² (printed in red) the same in the time of Hipparchus, β, β being the earlier positions of the two equinoctial points, and ββ², ββ² the later positions.
The annual motion β ββ² was, as has been stated, estimated by Hipparchus as being at least 36β³ (equivalent to one degree in a century), and probably more. Its true value is considerably more, namely about 50β³.
An important consequence of the motion of the equator thus discovered is that the sun in its annual journey round the ecliptic, after starting from the equinoctial point, returns to the new position of the equinoctial point a little before returning to its original position with respect to the stars, and the successive equinoxes occur slightly earlier than they otherwise would. From this fact is derived the name precession of the equinoxes, or more shortly, precession, which is applied to the motion that we have been considering. Hence it becomes necessary to recognise, as Hipparchus did, two different kinds of year, the tropical year or period required by the sun to return to the same position with respect to the equinoctial points, and the sidereal year or period of return to the same position with respect to the stars. If β ββ² denote the motion of the equinoctial point during a tropical year, then the sun after starting from the equinoctial point at β arrivesβat the end of a tropical yearβat the new equinoctial point at ββ²; but the sidereal year is only complete when the sun has further described the arc ββ² β and returned to its original starting-point β. Hence, taking the modern estimate 50β³ of the arc β ββ², the sun, in the sidereal year, describes an arc of 360Β°, in the tropical year an arc less by 50β³, or 359Β° 59β² 10β³; the lengths of the two years are therefore in this proportion, and the amount by which the sidereal year exceeds the tropical year bears to either the same ratio as 50β³ to 360Β° (or 1,296,000β³), and is therefore (365-1β4 Γ 50)β1296000 days of about 20
Comments (0)