Ragged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (fiction novels to read .txt) ๐
Another answer is that `The Philanthropists' is not a treatise oressay, but a novel. My main object was to write a readable story fullof human interest and based on the happenings of everyday life, thesubject of Socialism being treated incidentally.
This was the task I set myself. To what extent I have succeeded isfor others to say; but whatever their verdict, the work possesses atleast one merit - that of being true. I have invented nothing. Thereare no scenes or incidents in the story that I have not eitherwitnessed myself or had conclusive evidence of. As far as I dared Ilet th
Read free book ยซRagged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (fiction novels to read .txt) ๐ยป - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Robert Tressell
- Performer: -
Read book online ยซRagged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (fiction novels to read .txt) ๐ยป. Author - Robert Tressell
of the summer, the man who had come afterwards with the van, and who
had been struck down by a stone while attempting to speak from the
platform of the van, the man who had been nearly killed by the
upholders of the capitalist system. It was the same man! The
Socialist had been clean-shaven - this man wore beard and moustache -
but Barrington was certain he was the same.
When the man had concluded his speech he got down and stood in the
shade behind the platform, while someone else addressed the meeting,
and Barrington went round to where he was standing, intending to speak
to him.
All around them, pandemonium reigned supreme. They were in the
vicinity of the Slave Market, near the Fountain, on the Grand Parade,
where several roads met; there was a meeting going on at every corner,
and a number of others in different, parts of the roadway and on the
pavement of the Parade. Some of these meetings were being carried on
by two or three men, who spoke in turn from small, portable platforms
they carried with them, and placed wherever they thought there was a
chance of getting an audience.
Every now and then some of these poor wretches - they were all paid
speakers - were surrounded and savagely mauled and beaten by a hostile
crowd. If they were Tariff Reformers the Liberals mobbed them, and
vice versa. Lines of rowdies swaggered to and fro, arm in arm,
singing, `Vote, Vote, Vote, for good ole Closelandโ or `good ole
Sweaterโ, according as they were green or blue and yellow. Gangs of
hooligans paraded up and down, armed with sticks, singing, howling,
cursing and looking for someone to hit. Others stood in groups on the
pavement with their hands thrust in their pockets, or leaned against
walls or the shutters of the shops with expressions of ecstatic
imbecility on their faces, chanting the mournful dirge to the tune of
the church chimes,
`Good - ole - Sweat - er
Good - ole - Sweat - er
Good - ole - Sweat - er
Good - ole - Sweat - er.โ
Other groups - to the same tune - sang `Good - ole - Close - landโ;
and every now and again they used to leave off singing and begin to
beat each other. Fights used to take place, often between workmen,
about the respective merits of Adam Sweater and Sir Graball
DโEncloseland.
The walls were covered with huge Liberal and Tory posters, which
showed in every line the contempt of those who published them for the
intelligence of the working men to whom they were addressed. There
was one Tory poster that represented the interior of a public house;
in front of the bar, with a quart pot in his hand, a clay pipe in his
mouth, and a load of tools on his back, stood a degraded-looking brute
who represented the Tory ideal of what an Englishman should be; the
letterpress on the poster said it was a man! This is the ideal of
manhood that they hold up to the majority of their fellow countrymen,
but privately - amongst themselves - the Tory aristocrats regard such
`menโ with far less respect than they do the lower animals. Horses or
dogs, for instance.
The Liberal posters were not quite so offensive. They were more
cunning, more specious, more hypocritical and consequently more
calculated to mislead and deceive the more intelligent of the voters.
When Barrington got round to the back of the platform, he found the
man with the scarred face standing alone and gloomily silent in the
shadow. Barrington gave him one of the Socialist leaflets, which he
took, and after glancing at it, put it in his coat pocket without
making any remark.
`I hope youโll excuse me for asking, but were you not formerly a
Socialist?โ said Barrington.
Even in the semi-darkness Barrington saw the other man flush deeply
and then become very pale, and the unsightly scar upon his forehead
showed with ghastly distinctiveness.
`I am still a Socialist: no man who has once been a Socialist can ever
cease to be one.โ
`You seem to have accomplished that impossibility, to judge by the
work you are at present engaged in. You must have changed your
opinions since you were here last.โ
`No one who has been a Socialist can ever cease to be one. It is
impossible for a man who has once acquired knowledge ever to
relinquish it. A Socialist is one who understands the causes of the
misery and degradation we see all around us; who knows the only
remedy, and knows that that remedy - the state of society that will be
called Socialism - must eventually be adopted; is the only alternative
to the extermination of the majority of the working people; but it
does not follow that everyone who has sense enough to acquire that
amount of knowledge, must, in addition, be willing to sacrifice
himself in order to help to bring that state of society into being.
When I first acquired that knowledge,โ he continued, bitterly, `I was
eager to tell the good news to others. I sacrificed my time, my
money, and my health in order that I might teach others what I had
learned myself. I did it willingly and happily, because I thought
they would be glad to hear, and that they were worth the sacrifices I
made for their sakes. But I know better now.โ
`Even if you no longer believe in working for Socialism, thereโs no
need to work AGAINST it. If you are not disposed to sacrifice
yourself in order to do good to others, you might at least refrain
from doing evil. If you donโt want to help to bring about a better
state of affairs, thereโs no reason why you should help to perpetuate
the present system.โ
The other man laughed bitterly. `Oh yes, there is, and a very good
reason too.โ
`I donโt think you could show me a reason,โ said Barrington.
The man with the scar laughed again, the same unpleasant, mirthless
laugh, and thrusting his hand into his trouser pocket drew it out
again full of silver coins, amongst which one or two gold pieces
glittered.
`That is my reason. When I devoted my life and what abilities I
possess to the service of my fellow workmen; when I sought to teach
them how to break their chains; when I tried to show them how they
might save their children from poverty and shameful servitude, I did
not want them to give me money. I did it for love. And they paid me
with hatred and injury. But since I have been helping their masters
to rob them, they have treated me with respect.โ
Barrington made no reply and the other man, having returned the money
to his pocket, indicated the crowd with a sweep of his hand.
`Look at them!โ he continued with a contemptuous laugh. `Look at
them! the people you are trying to make idealists of! Look at them!
Some of them howling and roaring like wild beasts, or laughing like
idiots, others standing with dull and stupid faces devoid of any trace
of intelligence or expression, listening to the speakers whose words
convey no meaning to their stultified minds, and others with their
eyes gleaming with savage hatred of their fellow men, watching eagerly
for an opportunity to provoke a quarrel that they may gratify their
brutal natures by striking someone - their eyes are hungry for the
sight of blood! Canโt you see that these people, whom you are trying
to make understand your plan for the regeneration of the world, your
doctrine of universal brotherhood and love are for the most part -
intellectually - on level with Hottentots? The only things they feel
any real interest in are beer, football, betting and - of course - one
other subject. Their highest ambition is to be allowed to Work. And
they desire nothing better for their children!
`They have never had an independent thought in their lives. These are
the people whom you hope to inspire with lofty ideals! You might just
as well try to make a gold brooch out of a lump of dung! Try to
reason with them, to uplift them, to teach them the way to higher
things. Devote your whole life and intelligence to the work of trying
to get better conditions for them, and you will find that they
themselves are the enemy you will have to fight against. Theyโll hate
you, and, if they get the chance, theyโll tear you to pieces. But if
youโre a sensible man youโll use whatever talents and intelligence you
possess for your own benefit. Donโt think about Socialism or any
other โismโ. Concentrate your mind on getting money - it doesnโt
matter how you get it, but - get it. If you canโt get it honestly,
get it dishonestly, but get it! it is the only thing that counts. Do
as I do - rob them! exploit them! and then theyโll have some respect
for you.โ
`Thereโs something in what you say,โ replied Barrington, after a long
pause, `but itโs not all. Circumstances make us what we are; and
anyhow, the children are worth fighting for.โ
`You may think so now,โ said the other, `but youโll come to see it my
way some day. As for the children - if their parents are satisfied to
let them grow up to be half-starved drudges for other people, I donโt
see why you or I need trouble about it. If you like to listen to
reason,โ he continued after a pause, `I can put you on to something
that will be worth more to you than all your Socialism.โ
`What do you mean?โ
`Look here: youโre a Socialist; well, Iโm a Socialist too: that is, I
have sense enough to believe that Socialism is practical and
inevitable and right; it will come when the majority of the people are
sufficiently enlightened to demand it, but that enlightenment will
never be brought about by reasoning or arguing with them, for these
people are simply not intellectually capable of abstract reasoning -
they canโt grasp theories. You know what the late Lord Salisbury said
about them when somebody proposed to give them some free libraries: He
said: โThey donโt want libraries: give them a circus.โ You see these
Liberals and Tories understand the sort of people they have to deal
with; they know that although their bodies are the bodies of grown
men, their minds are the minds of little children. That is why it has
been possible to deceive and bluff and rob them for so long. But your
party persists in regarding them as rational beings, and thatโs where
you make a mistake - youโre simply wasting your time.
`The only way in which it is possible to teach these people is by
means of object lessons, and those are being placed before them in
increasing numbers every day. The trustification of industry - the
object lesson which demonstrates the possibility of collective
ownership - will in time compel even these to understand, and by the
time they have learnt that, they will also have learned by bitter
experience and not from theoretical teaching, that they must either
own the trusts or perish, and then, and not, till then, they will
achieve Socialism. But meanwhile we have this election. Do you think
it will make any real difference - for good or evil - which of these
two men is elected?โ
`No.โ
`Well, you canโt keep them both out - you have no candidate of your
own - why should you object to earning a few pounds by
Comments (0)