The Conquest of Bread by Peter Kropotkin (the best electronic book reader .TXT) ๐
Description
The Conquest of Bread is a political treatise written by the anarcho-communist philosopher Peter Kropotkin. Written after a split between anarchists and Marxists at the First International (a 19th-century association of left-wing radicals), The Conquest of Bread advocates a path to a communist society distinct from Marx and Engelsโs Communist Manifesto, rooted in the principles of mutual aid and voluntary cooperation.
Since its original publication in 1892, The Conquest of Bread has immensely influenced both anarchist theory and anarchist praxis. As one of the first comprehensive works of anarcho-communist theory published for wide distribution, it both popularized anarchism in general and encouraged a shift in anarchist thought from individualist anarchism to social anarchism. It was also an influential text among the Spanish anarchists in the Spanish Civil War of the 1930s, and the late anarchist theorist and anthropologist David Graeber cited the book as an inspiration for the Occupy movement of the early 2010s in his 2011 book Debt: The First 5,000 Years.
Read free book ยซThe Conquest of Bread by Peter Kropotkin (the best electronic book reader .TXT) ๐ยป - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Peter Kropotkin
Read book online ยซThe Conquest of Bread by Peter Kropotkin (the best electronic book reader .TXT) ๐ยป. Author - Peter Kropotkin
All things for all. Here is an immense stock of tools and implements; here are all those iron slaves which we call machines, which saw and plane, spin and weave for us, unmaking and remaking, working up raw matter to produce the marvels of our time. But nobody has the right to seize a single one of these machines and say: โThis is mine; if you want to use it you must pay me a tax on each of your products,โ any more than the feudal lord of medieval times had the right to say to the peasant: โThis hill, this meadow belong to me, and you must pay me a tax on every sheaf of corn you reap, on every brick you build.โ
All is for all! If the man and the woman bear their fair share of work, they have a right to their fair share of all that is produced by all, and that share is enough to secure them well-being. No more of such vague formulas as โThe right to work,โ or โTo each the whole result of his labour.โ What we proclaim is The Right to Well-Being: Well-Being for All!
II Well-Being for All IWell-being for all is not a dream. It is possible, realizable, owing to all that our ancestors have done to increase our powers of production.
We know, indeed, that the producers, although they constitute hardly one-third of the inhabitants of civilized countries, even now produce such quantities of goods that a certain degree of comfort could be brought to every hearth. We know further that if all those who squander today the fruits of othersโ toil were forced to employ their leisure in useful work, our wealth would increase in proportion to the number of producers, and more. Finally, we know that contrary to the theory enunciated by Malthusโ โthat Oracle of middle-class Economicsโ โthe productive powers of the human race increase at a much more rapid ratio than its powers of reproduction. The more thickly men are crowded on the soil, the more rapid is the growth of their wealth-creating power.
Thus, although the population of England has only increased from 1844 to 1890 by 62 percent, its production has grown, even at the lowest estimate, at double that rateโ โto wit, by 130 percent. In France, where the population has grown more slowly, the increase in production is nevertheless very rapid. Notwithstanding the crises through which agriculture is frequently passing, notwithstanding State interference, the blood-tax (conscription), and speculative commerce and finance, the production of wheat in France has increased fourfold, and industrial production more than tenfold, in the course of the last eighty years. In the United States this progress is still more striking. In spite of immigration, or rather precisely because of the influx of surplus European labour, the United States have multiplied their wealth tenfold.
However, these figures give but a very faint idea of what our wealth might become under better conditions. For alongside of the rapid development of our wealth-producing powers we have an overwhelming increase in the ranks of the idlers and middlemen. Instead of capital gradually concentrating itself in a few hands, so that it would only be necessary for the community to dispossess a few millionaires and enter upon its lawful heritageโ โinstead of this Socialist forecast proving true, the exact reverse is coming to pass: the swarm of parasites is ever increasing.
In France there are not ten actual producers to every thirty inhabitants. The whole agricultural wealth of the country is the work of less than 7,000,000 men, and in the two great industries, mining and the textile trades, you will find that the workers number less than 2,500,000. But the exploiters of labour, how many are they? In the United Kingdom a little over 1,000,000 workersโ โmen, women, and children, are employed in all the textile trades; less than 900,000 work the mines; much less than 2,000,000 till the ground, and it appeared from the last industrial census that only a little over 4,000,000 men, women and children were employed in all the industries.1 So that the statisticians have to exaggerate all the figures in order to establish a maximum of 8,000,000 producers to 45,000,000 inhabitants. Strictly speaking the creators of the goods exported from Britain to all the ends of the earth comprise only from six to seven million workers. And what is the number of the shareholders and middlemen who levy the first fruits of labour from far and near, and heap up unearned gains by thrusting themselves between the producer and the consumer?
Nor is this all. The owners of capital constantly reduce the output by restraining production. We need not speak of the cartloads of oysters thrown into the sea to prevent a dainty, hitherto reserved for the rich, from becoming a food for the people. We need not speak of the thousand and one luxuriesโ โstuffs, foods, etc., etc.โ โtreated after the same fashion as the oysters. It is enough to remember the way in which the production of the most necessary things is limited. Legions of miners are ready and willing to dig out coal every day, and send it to those who are shivering with cold; but too often a third, or even one-half, of their number are forbidden to work more than three days a week, because, forsooth, the price of coal must be
Comments (0)