Ragged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (fiction novels to read .txt) 📕
Another answer is that `The Philanthropists' is not a treatise oressay, but a novel. My main object was to write a readable story fullof human interest and based on the happenings of everyday life, thesubject of Socialism being treated incidentally.
This was the task I set myself. To what extent I have succeeded isfor others to say; but whatever their verdict, the work possesses atleast one merit - that of being true. I have invented nothing. Thereare no scenes or incidents in the story that I have not eitherwitnessed myself or had conclusive evidence of. As far as I dared Ilet th
Read free book «Ragged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (fiction novels to read .txt) 📕» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Robert Tressell
- Performer: -
Read book online «Ragged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (fiction novels to read .txt) 📕». Author - Robert Tressell
sure of getting for the same money anywhere else, and that was - a
good feed. (Applause.) Just for the sake of getting on with the
business, he would propose that they decide to go to Tubberton, and
that a committee be appointed to make arrangements - about the dinner -
with the landlord of the Queen Elizabeth’s Head at that place.
Philpot seconded the motion, and Payne was about to call for a show of
hands when Harlow rose to a point of order. It appeared to him that
they were getting on a bit too fast. The proper way to do this
business was first to take the feeling of the meeting as to whether
they wished to have a Beano at all, and then, if the meeting was in
favour of it, they could decide where they were to go, and whether
they would have a whole day or only half a day.
The Semidrunk said that he didn’t care a dreadful expression where
they went: he was willing to abide by the decision of the majority.
(Applause.) It was a matter of indifference to him whether they had a
day, or half a day, or two days; he was agreeable to anything.
Easton suggested that a special saloon carriage might be engaged, and
they could go and visit Madame Tussaud’s Waxworks. He had never been
to that place and had often wished to see it. But Philpot objected
that if they went there, Madame Tussaud’s might be unwilling to let
them out again.
Bundy endorsed the remarks that had fallen from Crass with reference
to Tubberton. He did not care where they went, they would never get
such a good spread for the money as they did last year at the Queen
Elizabeth. (Cheers.)
The chairman said that. he remembered the last Beano very well. They
had half a day - left off work on Saturday at twelve instead of one -
so there was only one hour’s wages lost - they went home, had a wash
and changed their clothes, and got up to the Cricketers, where the
brakes was waiting, at one. Then they had the two hours’ drive to
Tubberton, stopping on the way for drinks at the Blue Lion, the
Warrior’s Head, the Bird in Hand, the Dewdrop Inn and the World
Turned Upside Down. (Applause.) They arrived at the Queen Elizabeth
at three-thirty, and the dinner was ready; and it was one of the
finest blow-outs he had ever had. (Hear, hear.) There was soup,
vegetables, roast beef, roast mutton, lamb and mint sauce, plum duff,
Yorkshire, and a lot more. The landlord of the Elizabeth kept as good
a drop of beer as anyone could wish to drink, and as for the
teetotallers, they could have tea, coffee or ginger beer.
Having thus made another start, Payne found it very difficult to leave
off, and was proceeding to relate further details of the last Beano
when Harlow again rose up from his heap of shavings and said he wished
to call the chairman to order. (Hear, hear.) What the hell was the
use of all this discussion before they h&d even decided to have a
Beano at all! Was the meeting in favour of a Beano or not? That was
the question.
A prolonged and awkward silence followed. Everyone was very
uncomfortable, looking stolidly on the ground or staring straight in
front of them.
At last Easton broke the silence by suggesting that it would not be a
bad plan if someone was to make a motion that a Beano be held. This
was greeted with a general murmur of `Hear, hear,’ followed by another
awkward pause, and then the chairman asked Easton if he would move a
resolution to that effect. After some hesitation, Easton agreed, and
formally moved: `That this meeting is in favour of a Beano.’
The Semidrunk said that, in order to get on with the business, he
would second the resolution. But meantime, several arguments had
broken out between the advocates of different places, and several men
began to relate anecdotes of previous Beanos. Nearly everyone was
speaking at once and it was some time before the chairman was able to
put the resolution. Finding it impossible to make his voice heard
above the uproar, he began to hammer on the bench with a wooden
mallet, and to shout requests for order, but this only served to
increase the din. Some of them looked at him curiously and wondered
what was the matter with him, but the majority were so interested in
their own arguments that they did not notice him at all.
Whilst the chairman was trying to get the attention of the meeting in
order to put the question, Bundy had become involved in an argument
with several of the new hands who claimed to know of an even better
place than the Queen Elizabeth, a pub called `The New Found Out’, at
Mirkfield, a few miles further on than Tubberton, and another
individual joined in the dispute, alleging that a house called `The
Three Loggerheads’ at Slushton-cum-Dryditch was the finest place for a
Beano within a hundred miles of Mugsborough. He went there last year
with Pushem and Driver’s crowd, and they had roast beef, goose, jam
tarts, mince pies, sardines, blancmange, calves’ feet jelly and one
pint for each man was included in the cost of the dinner. In the
middle of the discussion, they noticed that most of the others were
holding up their hands, so to show there was no ill feeling they held
up theirs also and then the chairman declared it was carried
unanimously.
Bundy said he would like to ask the chairman to read out the
resolution which had just been passed, as he had not caught the words.
The chairman replied that there was no written resolution. The motion
was just to express the feeling of this meeting as to whether there
was to be an outing or not.
Bundy said he was only asking a civil question, a point of
information: all he wanted to know was, what was the terms of the
resolution? Was they in favour of the Beano or not?
The chairman responded that the meeting was unanimously in favour.
(Applause.)
Harlow said that the next thing to be done was to decide upon the
date. Crass suggested the last Saturday in August. That would give
them plenty of time to pay in.
Sawkins asked whether it was proposed to have a day or only half a
day. He himself was in favour of the whole day. It would only mean
losing a morning’s work. It was hardly worth going at all if they
only had half the day.
The Semidrunk remarked that he had just thought of a very good place
to go if they decided to have a change. Three years ago he was
working for Dauber and Botchit and they went to `The First In and the
Last Out’ at Bashford. It was a very small place, but there was a
field where you could have a game of cricket or football, and the
dinner was A1 at Lloyds. There was also a skittle alley attached to
the pub and no charge was made for the use of it. There was a bit of
a river there, and one of the chaps got so drunk that he went orf his
onion and jumped into the water, and when they got him out the village
policeman locked him up, and the next day he was took before the beak
and fined two pounds or a month’s hard labour for trying to commit
suicide.
Easton pointed out that there was another way to look at it: supposing
they decided to have the Beano, he supposed it would come to about six
shillings a head. If they had it at the end of August and started
paying in now, say a tanner a week, they would have plenty of time to
make up the amount, but supposing the work fell off and some of them
got the push?
Crass said that in that case a man could either have his money back or
he could leave it, and continue his payments even if he were working
for some other firm; the fact that he was off from Rushton’s would not
prevent him from going to the Beano.
Harlow proposed that they decide to go to the Queen Elizabeth the same
as last year, and that they have half a day.
Philpot said that, in order to get on with the business, he would
second the resolution.
Bundy suggested - as an amendment -. that it should be a whole day,
starting from the Cricketers at nine in the morning, and Sawkins said
that, in order to get on with the business, he would second the
amendment.
One of the new hands said he wished to move another amendment. He
proposed to strike out the Queen Elizabeth and substitute the Three
Loggerheads.
The Chairman - after a pause - inquired if there were any seconder to
this, and the Semidrunk said that, although he did not care much
where they went, still, to get on with the business, he would second
the amendment, although for his own part he would prefer to go to the
`First In and Last Out’ at Bashford.
The new hand offered to withdraw his suggestion re the Three
Loggerheads in favour of the Semidrunks proposition, but the latter
said it didn’t matter; it could go as it was.
As it was getting rather late, several men went home, and cries of
`Put the question’ began to be heard on all sides; the chairman
accordingly was proceeding to put Harlow’s proposition when the new
hand interrupted him by pointing out that it was his duty as chairman
to put the amendments first. This produced another long discussion,
in the course of which a very tall, thin man who had a harsh, metallic
voice gave a long rambling lecture about the rules of order and the
conduct of public meetings. He spoke very slowly and deliberately,
using very long words and dealing with the subject in an exhaustive
manner. A resolution was a resolution, and an amendment was an
amendment; then there was what was called an amendment to an
amendment; the procedure of the House of Commons differed very
materially from that of the House of Lords - and so on.
This man kept on talking for about ten minutes, and might have
continued for ten hours if he had not been rudely interrupted by
Harlow, who said that it seemed to him that they were likely to stay
there all night if they went on like they were going. He wanted his
tea, and he would also like to get a few hours’ sleep before having to
resume work in the morning. He was getting about sick of all this
talk. (Hear, hear.) In order to get on with the business, he would
withdraw his resolution if the others would withdraw their amendments.
If they would agree to do this, he would then propose another
resolution which - if carried - would meet all the requirements of the
case. (Applause.)
The man with the metallic voice observed that it was not necessary to
ask the consent of those who had moved amendments: if the original
proposition was withdrawed, all the amendments fell to the ground.
`Last year,’ observed Crass, `when we was goin’ out of the room after
we’d finished our dinner at the Queen Elizabeth, the landlord pointed
to the table and said, “There’s enough left over for you all to ‘ave
another lot.”’ (Cheers.)
Comments (0)