Ragged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (fiction novels to read .txt) 📕
Another answer is that `The Philanthropists' is not a treatise oressay, but a novel. My main object was to write a readable story fullof human interest and based on the happenings of everyday life, thesubject of Socialism being treated incidentally.
This was the task I set myself. To what extent I have succeeded isfor others to say; but whatever their verdict, the work possesses atleast one merit - that of being true. I have invented nothing. Thereare no scenes or incidents in the story that I have not eitherwitnessed myself or had conclusive evidence of. As far as I dared Ilet th
Read free book «Ragged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (fiction novels to read .txt) 📕» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Robert Tressell
- Performer: -
Read book online «Ragged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (fiction novels to read .txt) 📕». Author - Robert Tressell
Grand Parade near the Kiosk. The shelter would serve as a protection
against rain, or the rays of the sun in summer. It would add
materially to the comfort of visitors and would be a notable addition
to the attractions of the town.
Councillor Didlum said it was a very good idear, and proposed that the
Surveyor be instructed to get out the plans.
Dr Weakling opposed the motion. (Laughter.) It seemed to him that
the object was to benefit, not the town, but Mr Grinder.
(Disturbance.) If this shelter were erected, it would increase the
value of the Kiosk as a refreshment bar by a hundred per cent. If Mr
Grinder wanted a shelter for his customers he should pay for it
himself. (Uproar.) He (Dr Weakling) was sorry to have to say it, but
he could not help thinking that this was a Put-up job. (Loud cries of
`Withdraw’ `Apologize’ `Cast ‘im out’ and terrific uproar.)
Weakling did not apologize or withdraw, but he said no more. Didlum’s
proposition was carried, and the `hand’ went on to the next item on
the agenda, which was a proposal by Councillor Didlum to increase the
salary of Mr Oyley Sweater, the Borough Engineer, from fifteen pounds
to seventeen pounds per week.
Councillor Didlum said that when they had a good man they ought to
appreciate him. (Applause.) Compared with other officials, the
Borough Engineer was not fairly paid. (Hear, hear.) The magistrates’
clerk received seventeen pounds a week. The Town Clerk seventeen
pounds per week. He did not wish it to be understood that he thought
those gentlemen were overpaid - far from it. (Hear, hear.) It was
not that they got too much but that the Engineer got too little. How
could they expect a man like that to exist on a paltry fifteen pounds
a week? Why, it was nothing more or less than sweating! (Hear,
hear.) He had much pleasure in moving that the Borough Engineer’s
salary be increased to seventeen pounds a week, and that his annual
holiday be extended from a fortnight to one calendar month with hard
la-he begged pardon - with full pay. (Loud cheers.)
Councillor Rushton said that he did not propose to make a long speech -
it was not necessary. He would content himself with formally
seconding Councillor Didlum’s excellent proposition. (Applause.)
Councillor Weakling, whose rising was greeted with derisive laughter,
said he must oppose the resolution. He wished it to be understood
that he was not actuated by any feeling of personal animosity towards
the Borough Engineer, but at the same time he considered it his duty
to say that in his (Dr Weakling’s) opinion, that official would be
dear at half the price they were now paying him. (Disturbance.) He
did not appear to understand his business, nearly all the work that
was done cost in the end about double what the Borough Engineer
estimated it could be done for. (Liar.) He considered him to be a
grossly incompetent person (uproar) and was of opinion that if they
were to advertise they could get dozens of better men who would be
glad to do the work for five pounds a week. He moved that Mr Oyley
Sweater be asked to resign and that they advertise for a man at five
pounds a week. (Great uproar.)
Councillor Grinder rose to a point of order. He appealed to the
Chairman to squash the amendment. (Applause.)
Councillor Didlum remarked that he supposed Councillor Grinder meant
`quash’: in that case, he would support the suggestion.
Councillor Grinder said it was about time they put a stopper on that
feller Weakling. He (Grinder) did not care whether they called it
squashing or quashing; it was all the same so long as they nipped him
in the bud. (Cheers.) The man was a disgrace to the Council; always
interfering and hindering the business.
The Mayor - Alderman Sweater - said that he did not think it
consistent with the dignity of that Council to waste any more time
over this scurrilous amendment. (Applause.) He was proud to say that
it had never even been seconded, and therefore he would put Mr
Didlum’s resolution - a proposition which he had no hesitation in
saying reflected the highest credit upon that gentleman and upon all
those who supported it. (Vociferous cheers.)
All those who were in favour signified their approval in the customary
manner, and as Weakling was the only one opposed, the resolution was
carried and the meeting proceeded to the next business.
Councillor Rushton said that several influential ratepayers and
employers of labour had complained to him about the high wages of the
Corporation workmen, some of whom were paid sevenpence-halfpenny an
hour. Sevenpence an hour was the maximum wage paid to skilled workmen
by private employers in that town, and he failed to see why the
Corporation should pay more. (Hear, hear.) It had a very bad effect
on the minds of the men in the employment of private firms, tending to
make them dissatisfied with their wages. The same state of affairs
prevailed with regard to the unskilled labourers in the Council’s
employment. Private employers could get that class of labour for
fourpence-halfpenny or fivepence an hour, and yet the corporation paid
fivepence-halfpenny and even sixpence for the same class of work.
(Shame.) It was not fair to the ratepayers. (Hear, hear.)
Considering that the men in the employment of the Corporation had
almost constant work, if there was to be a difference at all, they
should get not more, but less, than those who worked for private
firms. (Cheers.) He moved that the wages of the Corporation workmen
be reduced in all cases to the same level as those paid by private
firms.
Councillor Grinder seconded. He said it amounted to a positive
scandal. Why, in the summertime some of these men drew as much as
35/- in a single week! (Shame.) and it was quite common for unskilled
labourers - fellers who did nothing but the very hardest and most
laborious work, sich as carrying sacks of cement, or digging up the
roads to get at the drains, and sich-like easy jobs - to walk off with
25/- a week! (Sensation.) He had often noticed some of these men
swaggering about the town on Sundays, dressed like millionaires and
cigared up! They seemed quite a different class of men from those who
worked for private firms, and to look at the way some of their
children was dressed you’d think their fathers was Cabinet Minstrels!
No wonder the ratepayers complained ot the high rates. Another
grievance was that all the Corporation workmen were allowed two days’
holiday every year, in addition to the Bank Holidays, and were paid
for them! (Cries of `shame’, `Scandalous’, `Disgraceful’, etc.) No
private contractor paid his men for Bank Holidays, and why should the
Corporation do so? He had much pleasure in seconding Councillor
Rushton’s resolution.
Councillor Weakling opposed the motion. He thought that 35/- a week
was little enough for a man to keep a wife and family with (Rot), even
if all the men got it regularly, which they did not. Members should
consider what was the average amount per week throughout the whole
year, not merely the busy time, and if they did that they would find
that even the skilled men did not average more than 25/- a week, and
in many cases not so much. If this subject had not been introduced by
Councillor Rushton, he (Dr Weakling) had intended to propose that the
wages of the Corporation workmen should be increased to the standard
recognized by the Trades Unions. (Loud laughter.) It had been proved
that the notoriously short lives of the working people - whose average
span of life was about twenty years less than that of the well-to-do
classes - their increasingly inferior physique, and the high rate of
mortality amongst their children was caused by the wretched
remuneration they received for hard and tiring work, the excessive
number of hours they have to work, when employed, the bad quality of
their food, the badly constructed and insanitary homes their poverty
compels them to occupy, and the anxiety, worry, and depression of mind
they have to suffer when out of employment. (Cries of `Rot’, `Bosh’,
and loud laughter.) Councillor Didlum said, `Rot’. It was a very
good word to describe the disease that was sapping the foundations of
society and destroying the health and happiness and the very lives of
so many of their fellow countrymen and women. (Renewed merriment and
shouts of `Go and buy a red tie.’) He appealed to the members to
reject the resolution. He was very glad to say that he believed it
was true that the workmen in the employ of the Corporation were a
little better off than those in the employ of private contractors, and
if it were so, it was as it should be. They had need to be better off
than the poverty-stricken, half-starved poor wretches who worked for
private firms.
Councillor Didlum said that it was very evident that Dr Weakling had
obtained his seat on that Council by false pretences. If he had told
the ratepayers that he was a Socialist, they would never have elected
him. (Hear, hear.) Practically every Christian minister in the
country would agree with him (Didlum) when he said that the poverty of
the working classes was caused not by the `wretched remuneration they
receive as wages’, but by Drink. (Loud applause.) And he was very
sure that the testimony of the clergy of all denominations was more to
be relied upon than the opinion of a man like Dr Weakling. (Hear,
hear.)
Dr Weakling said that if some of the clergymen referred to or some of
the members of the council had to exist and toil amid the same sordid
surroundings, overcrowding and ignorance as some of the working
classes, they would probably seek to secure some share of pleasure and
forgetfulness in drink themselves! (Great uproar and shouts of
`Order’, `Withdraw’, `Apologize’.)
Councillor Grinder said that even if it was true that the haverage
lives of the working classes was twenty years shorter than those of
the better classes, he could not see what it had got to do with Dr
Weakling. (Hear, hear.) So long as the working class was contented
to die twenty years before their time, he failed to see what it had
got to do with other people. They was not runnin’ short of workers,
was they? There was still plenty of ‘em left. (Laughter.) So long
as the workin’ class was satisfied to die orf - let ‘em die orf! It
was a free country. (Applause.) The workin’ class adn’t arst Dr
Weakling to stick up for them, had they? If they wasn’t satisfied,
they would stick up for theirselves! The working men didn’t want the
likes of Dr Weakling to stick up for them, and they would let ‘im know
it when the next election came round. If he (Grinder) was a wordly
man, he would not mind betting that the workin’ men of Dr Weakling’s
ward would give him `the dirty kick out’ next November. (Applause.)
Councillor Weakling, who knew that this was probably true, made no
further protest. Rushton’s proposition was carried, and then the
Clerk announced that the next item was the resolution Mr Didlum had
given notice of at the last meeting, and the Mayor accordingly called
upon that gentleman.
Councillor Didlum, who was received with loud cheers, said that
unfortunately a certain member of that Council seemed to think he had
a right to oppose nearly everything that was brought forward.
(The majority of the members of the Band glared malignantly at
Weakling.)
He hoped that for once the
Comments (0)