Non vowel resources of some good mood by Alexander Borodin (books to get back into reading TXT) 📕

among states, will the state be the only one on planet Earth? Don’t believe, don’t be afraid, don’t ask - you listen to some media and hear some people appeal to the governments of their countries with a request to increase their wages, but how to do this, send troops, as it was in history, so that they won material wealth, but then will someone feel good, but someone will feel bad? Where does the ultrahumanistic environment come from - does it appear when society is rich in material wealth? Where in some cases come material wealth - from past conquests by the ancestors of those who live in this ultrahuman environment? What is called transhumanism, will relieve psychological and physical suffering?

Exoticism exists in everything, even in politics, referring to various administrative-territorial entities and states, such as the state in the Vatican City or the Barentsburg archipelago in Norway (there is information on the Internet).

It’s clear, as political scientists say, and one cannot disagree with them that the presence of many states on the planet, that is, the existence of a multipolar world, is beneficial for all mankind, but when any state remains alone, crushing the entire territory of the earth, it will most likely a world concentration camp, because when the world becomes unipolar, then the competition among those who govern the states will end. No matter how ridiculous it sounds, on top of that, getting into a concentration camp contradicts the rules followed by a supporter of a healthy lifestyle (healthy lifestyle), as, in principle, it is not in the interest of getting into a concentration camp who is not an adherent of healthy lifestyle.

And this is why a multipolar world is needed - as long as there is a multipolar world, any government creates the most fair laws and living conditions so that people's lives are as comfortable as possible, so that people do not envy people from other countries and do not seek to go there. In the case of monopolarity, there will be no more reverence between state leadership and the population, and attempts to create multipolarity will be destroyed in the bud?

“Every 10 minutes, someone dies of hunger” - the Planet channel, the broadcast date of the broadcast in which it was mentioned, August 13, 2014. As a rule, according to the media, children die of starvation in Africa, a continent where they still divide the world in some places not through psychological warfare and psychological operations, but where they divide the world using machine guns, cannons and other weapons of physical destruction and defeat.

There are more places in politics: according to the media, at first the church ruled the world, then the kings and the church, then the parliament, together with the kings, the church, later appeared, those who could also influence the political processes are human rights activists, party organizations, but perhaps this and not so, perhaps the press information called yellow? The time has long ended when there was slavery, people already know everything, information cannot be concealed, it itself is imposed, rushing from all angles, including the Internet. The task of everyone who wants to achieve something is to correctly understand what is happening in the world, not to lose the sense of reality. As already mentioned, from the moment that nuclear weapons were invented, the physical wars between the countries that received these weapons ended, a psychological war began (it is not for nothing that nuclear weapons are called a deterrent). At the moment, no one will dare to attack anyone if two opponents have weapons of mass destruction, such as nuclear, that is suicide for both sides. But the thirst for control, of course, did not disappear anywhere, just as Sigmund Freud described the repressed sexual attraction - the libido, it does not disappear, it just kind of transforms.

As already discussed, some countries began to fight through psychological operations against each other, but a country where there is no nuclear weapon can be attacked in the old, old-fashioned ways, with the help of the army, everything is like in ordinary life - if you are weak, everyone will kick you if there is power, then they will fear you, and here, there are missiles with nuclear warheads - they will reckon with you.

Legal norms are psychological dogmas reincarnated into the law, that is, laws are “adapted” to the psychological component of the state’s population, in some states religion is the basis of laws, in some laws just regulate everyone’s behavior? As a rule, do you like films, clips and other works in which those who like them recognize themselves? Are films, in some cases, a psychotherapeutic tool for the public? Why in this work are the names of the films indicated - in them are the words and phrases of the main characters that clearly define reality?

They never lie so much as after a hunt and before the election.

Words attributed to Otto von Bismarck

By what you like, you can make a psychological portrait of someone who likes a particular thing. The discussed topic of politics was touched upon at the end of this material, because in order to understand everyday life, it will not hurt to correctly understand the political processes taking place in the world (you can buy a textbook on political science, it is being examined more and more deeply), since, as before It has already been pointed out that the psychological is intertwined not only with the legal, but also with the political, and in the heat of the political struggle, earlier, some writers uncovered some “underwater” trends: how is politics done, and therefore it is recommended to get acquainted with the following literature, as well as watch and listen to dialogues and monologues in the following films, because the films were shot on the basis of life experience, and therefore there are high percentages of reality, science fiction films are also made on the basis of life experience, only it seems like the future (mentioned already or not that all Soviet films about intelligence were necessarily watched by employees of some foreign intelligence services).

Attention, this is an affirmative sentence: all the films mentioned in this work are presented for acquaintance, not for taking on any armament, please do not forget to be critical of everything.

Documentary film: The Venus project in the film Spirit of the Times, parts 1, 2, and 3 (USA, 2007-2009). If psychologists are now stigmatizing any human behavior, even greed - it is already considered almost a mental illness - does it mean that a person with super-valuable ideas can be dependent on the formation of pseudo-reality, a kind of dependence on social engineering? They are proposing to implement the Venus project, but it seems to have already been implemented for a long time, if not completely, then partially in rich oil countries, the authors of the film do not even voice this, the creator of the project says this or that needs to be done, but this or that costs money , and therefore it is not feasible in most countries of the world at the moment. Take a piece of land in the forest or an abandoned village and create the project "Venus", who's stopping you? But the creator of the project can say that he needs money for this, and for money both I and the one who reads this material can create the Venus project itself, it’s like the fairy tale “Porridge from the ax” - put the ax, then the groats, then onions and so on, and it turns out that the ax has nothing to do with it, and most importantly the ingredients for porridge, and the same thing here, everything is headed by money? “Propaganda” - a film about the psychological war (North Korea, 2012); “Secrets of intelligence” (Russia, 2004-2005); “Special Services of the Oligarchs” (Russia, 2007); Grantoed, a film from the state of emergency series was shown on the Russian NTV channel; “A Million Marriage”, a film from the series “We Never Had Dreams,” was shown on the Russian channel REN-TV, “The Conditions We Accept” (USA, 2012, director Cullen Hoback); historical series “In Search of Truth” (Ukraine, 2010, director Maxim Bortnik). I watched films about Bobby Sands (you can find out who this is from the historical series “In Search of Truth”, Ukraine, 2010, directed by Maxim Bortnik).

Feature film. Soviet cinema. “TASS is authorized to declare” (1984, director Vladimir Fokin); Rafferty (1980, director Semyon Aranovich); “The entire royal army” (1971, directors Alexander Gutkovich, Naum Ardashnikov); “Shield and Sword” (1968, director Vladimir Basov); “Seventeen Moments of Spring” (1973, director Tatyana Lioznova); “The Feat of a Scout” (1947, director Boris Barnet); “Resident Error” (1968, director Veniamin Dorman); “The Fate of the Resident” (1970, director Veniamin Dorman); “Return of the Resident” (1982, director Veniamin Dorman); “The End of Operation Resident,” (1986, director Veniamin Dorman); “Operation Trust” (USSR, 1967, director Sergei Kolosov); “On the Pomegranate Islands” (USSR, 1981, director Tamara Lisitsian); “The Way to Saturn (1967, directed by Villen Azarov); “The End of Saturn (1968, directed by Villen Azarov); “The fight after the victory” (1972, director Villen Azarov); “Castling in the long direction” (1969, director Vladimir Grigoriev); “The Dead Season” (1968, directed by Savva Kulish); “Dossier per person in a Mercedes” (1986, directed by Georgy Nikolayenko); “State Border” (USSR, 1980, director Boris Stepanov), “Long Road in the Dunes” (USSR, 1980-1981, director Allois Branch), “Pavel Korchagin” (USSR, 1956) - in our time this film was called it would be a psychological thriller, although in this film there is propaganda of the proper way of life and the lines of behavior that a person of that time living in the USSR should have; Sleeping Lion is a 1965 Soviet feature film directed by K. Gakkel about a humble man who began to show character; the film "Red and Black" (USSR, 1976); detective “Souvenir for the prosecutor”, 1989, USSR, director Alexander Kosarev; comedy “A Nightmare in a Madhouse”, USSR, 1990, director Nikolai Gusarov. The film is about those who are called crooks and sneakers, in this case, about those who penetrated scientific institutions: “Who laughs last”, 1954, USSR, Belarus film, director Vladimir Korsh-Sablin; "Gangster Petersburg", production Russia, 2000, director Victor Sergeev.

Feature film: Octopus (Italy, 1984-2001, directors Damiano Damiani, Florestano Vancini, Luigi Parelli, Giacomo Battiato).

An interesting movie: The Golden Calf (USSR, 1968, directed by Mikhail Schweizer), The Twelve Chairs (USSR, 1976, directed by Mark Zakharov), The Twelve Chairs (USSR, 1971, directed by Leonid Gaidai).

An interesting movie: “Don't Think About White Monkeys” (Russia, 2008, director Yuri Mamin); “Oxygen” (Russia, 2009, director Ivan Vyrypaev); “Shadow, or maybe it will all work out” (USSR, 1991, director Mikhail Kozakov), science fiction “Rejection” (Russia, 2009, director Vladimir Lert) - until science gives the person what he wants, he replaces reality fantasies, a film about this, like the movie "Scarlet Sails" (USSR, 1961, directed by Alexander Ptushko), as one person said - no one wants to work, everyone is waiting for "Scarlet Sails." Films based on the stories of Irwin Welch: Acid House, etc.

By the way, this has already been said: 1991 is the year of the release of the most not criticized, I want to emphasize that it is not the criticized ones, but not the most objective films and other works of art. In the 90s, everyone published what he wanted, whether he was really crazy, whether he was an agent of influence, many television and radio programs, stories, films that were released in the 90s during the collapse of the USSR, belong partially, according to the media, categories of authors, and of course, not only such people worked in the field of art, but also did not belong to this category. And this happened not only in the 90s, it is in any post-revolutionary period, but it is short-lived.

In the film “Twelve Chairs” (USSR, 1971, directed by Leonid Gaidai), the moment is indicated when Kisa (Papanov) and Bender (Mironov) came to the theater, in which there was a post-revolutionary production, after which Kisa said: “What a horror”. This was the post-revolutionary period when theaters made productions without looking back at anyone's opinion. Interesting movie: “On The Run”, directed by Michael Allcock, Tim O ›Breen, Dennis Murphy, Canada, 2005, a film screened on Discovery world; films shown on Viasat history: The Romantics, author Peter Ackroyd, United Kingdom, 2006, and Unsung Heroes, director Justin Chadwick, France, 2015.

Fantastic series with philosophical subtexts