Non vowel resources of some good mood by Alexander Borodin (books to get back into reading TXT) 📕

It would give out the suggested options for those in a difficult situation, and the wider the radius of the supposed situations would be loaded into the program, regardless of whether it is psychological or legal, or some other, the better. It would be something like a PROMT translator, only you enter a word or phrase into it and get the answer in the form of a translation, and in this version you introduce a problem and get, as already mentioned, the answer, i.e. the proposed option or options for solutions to the problem, from which it will be possible to choose for yourself one, the most optimal one, taking into account your personal qualities and the other, and perhaps the machine itself would do it. Again, this may be something more perfect - the same augmented reality with virtual gadgets.

And this is not quite and not only a utopian idea in terms of solving all problems, pragmatism, there is also a place here, and it is very large. The creation of such a legal program, for example, would be extremely profitable in terms of making money on this for someone who would take up the implementation of this idea. Imagine: we need advice (informal - that lawyers are afraid to give, thinking that because of it they can lose their social status due to the deprivation of a license for lawyer activity, although these worries can be far-fetched, because lawyers are people too, and they are subjected to emotions). To get an answer to such a question, you need to dig a lot of information on the Internet or go to a lawyer and pay him money for a consultation, after which it is not a fact that the lawyer will give the information that will help you (there have been cases when the lawyer gave the wrong advice, and often), since the lawyer may not be fully competent in this matter or be afraid to give the necessary advice that is not entirely consistent with the lawyer ethics, he may also be interested in extracting more money from you and giving you incorrect advice specifically that if you asked him for help longer, and, accordingly, he would earn more due to this, or in general, what often happens, a lawyer may turn out to be the so-called “lenient” - a friend of law enforcement officers (this is what the lawyers themselves say informal conversation).

If the machine where the program is located will give you an answer, in the creation of which decent and competent lawyers and programmers took part, the answer will be the most ideal, for example: as a familiar lawyer said, you should not go to a law enforcement officer to familiarize yourself with the administrative protocol, since it will not be in your favor. According to the law, in some countries the administrative protocol must be familiarized with the one who is held accountable, he must know what article he is called to account for, if there was no familiarization, this is a violation of the law by the structure conducting the administrative process, and the basis for the return of the case court to the one who submitted it to the court.

If these rules are violated (there is no record in the record of the person being held accountable, executed by his hand, that he is acquainted, and there is no signature), the administrative protocol will not have legal force, since, according to the law, the person with respect to whom an administrative protocol was drawn up, it must be familiarized with it, if it is not, this is a procedural violation by law enforcement agencies or other structures that have the right to bring citizens to administrative responsibility and lead the administrator An active process in relation to someone (environmental services, trade control services, etc.).

While law enforcement officers will look for you to acquaint yourself with the protocol, the deadlines for bringing you to administrative responsibility will come out, and they will search, since they need your signature in the protocol of an administrative violation, you cannot refer the matter to the court without it, because if the court finds out that the prosecutor is not familiar with the protocol; the case can be returned to the authorities that submitted it to the court, or terminated.

With such advice made by the program, you did not spend a cent on the services of a lawyer, and besides, the advice made by the machine should be as objective as possible, since there is no human factor in the form of the greed or incompetence of a lawyer or lawyer - greed, because, like It has already been said that some lawyers want to earn more money, and therefore it is unprofitable for such people to take legal actions aimed at quickly solving the client’s problem, they need to talk longer and earn more. Incompetence is when a lawyer gives not entirely legally competent advice to a client. As laws change, the program can be updated via the Internet, for example, as an anti-virus program for a computer, the same with a program of a psychological plan, if one is created.

THE ENDING

Bold text throughout the material highlights words and phrases with which it is easier to convince someone or impress someone; bold text also indicates phrases that are worth focusing on.

This material is not a guide to action, and everything that is indicated in it is not a bible, nobody teaches anyone (by the way, remember the saying that it’s best to cook your woman’s soup), each authority is its own, this material was created for familiarization and does not promote anyone's ideals or beliefs.

Caution with ambition - the main thing is not to convince yourself that you are the messiah, or that all people are descended from you? Made in a democratic kingdom (substitute the name of any state at the end of this phrase), and you can immediately hear a double meaning: how can a kingdom be democratic? Machines are we, the desire for sex and more - do we have programs that for some reason are called instincts? People are software creatures, me, you, we, they are biological robots? Aggression, love and other programs - everything will be as programmed, and no one will change anything until a certain point, until science reaches the level where it will be possible to reprogram everyone? Why do some people stop worrying and worrying, use alcohol and drugs just when religion appears in their life, one phrase changes their life: everything that happens to you is the will of the creator, and whatever you do, it will still be like this how should it be? As already mentioned, what seems bad, maybe, oddly enough, good: didn’t pay your salary, didn’t go to get money - you weren’t robbed, didn’t you have an accident on the way to get money or back? There were cases when famous people cherished themselves, but later died of cancer? I can’t believe that out of millions or even billions of people who have ever been killed, no one would get cancer and die for a long time and in torment, if he survived - a paradox, but those who were killed could face with this? Some structures contribute to the development of neurosis by bending the stick with the propaganda of caution: be careful, watch yourself - is this in some cases an installation for neurosis? You will die when the time comes, no matter how careful you are, you’re not dead - does it mean that the time has not come? The point is to be afraid of death (in the sense when it begins to interfere with life, when it turns into a neurosis) and everything else, when you die anyway? We repeat once again: there is information that is not for everyone that should be sold by prescription, for example, in a pharmacy - to a person who is fine and who feels comfortable, information that you need to be less cautious will be even harmful, less cautious need someone who has paralyzed fear for his life and health?

Boss, I did it. So everyone can say, when he did something, to the higher powers that endowed him, for example, with ambition and set certain tasks (or maybe not higher powers, maybe upbringing, in this case, is not entirely important) and endowed with psychological discomfort , expressed in psychological dissatisfaction, until something has done what is prescribed. Then, after reaching what you aspired to, there will be psychological discomfort, you can relax and amuse your self-esteem, as well as enjoy the internal opiates of endorphins, which will send you higher forces as a reward for the work done through the development of their endocrine system.

The words and actions of someone after voicing them demonstrate the influence of phrases on the neurochemical processes of the one who heard these phrases - they went obscene to someone, and you will see how the average person will react. You can manipulate emotions with the help of phrases and win sympathy and emotional affection for yourself, or create supporters around yourself, in a word, who needs what you can and can do, you can make enemies through phrases.

Do not forget - sympathy for you and everything else that is positive and emotional is formed after you give someone the opportunity to get a portion of endorphins from something you’ve heard from or made by you, or, as has already been said, creating a micro-revolution in someone’s mind it’s from some information new to the listener that you’ve heard from you, and then (this is the lyrics) the schizophrenic’s dream can come true in general, you can become for some if not a messiah, then at least a leader, although maybe for a short while - the information changes consciousness.

We remember the endorphins, with the help of which the higher forces say what needs to be done and what to strive for, therefore, forgive my ambition, I say to the higher forces "Boss, I did this", my goal is from a movement to which and from which I enjoyed, achieved, the psychological stress removed, the book is written, although the volume of the pages looks more like a brochure than a book, but nevertheless I am pleased that I finished writing this material, I received a portion of endorphins, now I need to make an effort to publish it and gender chit new batch of endorphins and relieve themselves of psychological discomfort.

In the end, I want to add the lyrical considerations of my relatives, which have already been mentioned: "There are a lot of" players ", nobody wants to go to work on the construction site and plant." Or the remark of my employer, which he voiced when he saw that one person was engaged in physical labor, and several bosses were standing nearby and indicating how and where to dig a shovel: "Seven are waving, one is e-mailing." All specialists in psychological warfare, psychological operations, lawyers, psychologists, etc., will soon have nobody to work, and a simple worker will be worth its weight in gold, and I also want to remind you of the statistics on the Internet that in one big state, whose name I do not remember Only about 10 million people are engaged in real production of something.

All civilized countries begin to experience a shortage of people engaged in physical labor, if it weren’t for emigrants, it would have been generally tight, probably such continents as Africa and Asia were really invented in order to close this gap, from there it arrives in developed countries The main stream of simple workers. If things go on like this, it will not be surprising if they soon begin to erect monuments to ordinary workers, and not to different manufacturers of intangible goods - to different figures, but the role of producers of intangible goods should also not be underestimated, because they stand on the protection of civilization and other values, and it is people who are not engaged in physical