Many Dimensions by Charles Williams (namjoon book recommendations txt) 📕
"Will you at least try, sir?" Ali asked.
"Why, no," the Ambassador answered. "No, I do not think I will even try. It is but the word of Hajji Ibrahim here. Had he not known of the treachery of his kinsmen and come to England by the same boat as Giles Tumulty we should have known very little of what had happened, and that vaguely. But as it is, we were warned of what you call the sacrilege, and now you have talked to him, and you are convinced. But what shall I say to the Foreign Minister? No; I do not think I will try."
"You do not believe it," the Hajji said. "You do not believe that this is the Crown of Suleiman or that Allah put a mystery into it when His Permission bestowed it on the King?"
The Ambassador considered. "I have known you a long while," he said thoughtfully, "and I will tell you what I believe. I know that your
Read free book «Many Dimensions by Charles Williams (namjoon book recommendations txt) 📕» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Charles Williams
- Performer: -
Read book online «Many Dimensions by Charles Williams (namjoon book recommendations txt) 📕». Author - Charles Williams
foresight?
Sir Giles in a burst of anger and something remarkably like alarm,
realized that he didn’t know.
He remembered the knocking, the caretaker, the entrance of the
inspector to whom Palliser was talking—very well the Professor was
doing, Sir Giles thought, only he probably hadn’t realized the
difficulty; he wouldn’t, not with that kind of cancer-eaten sponge he
called an intellect. “But I remember,” Tumulty thought impatiently.
“How the hell could I remember if it hadn’t happened? There’d be
nothing to remember.” He plunged deeper. “But at twelve I should
remember. Then if it’s come off—I remember what hasn’t happened. I’m am
in a delusion. I’m’m mad. Nonsense. I’m in the twelve state of
consciousness. But the twelve state couldn’t be unless the eleven to
twelve state had been. Am I here or am I sitting in that blasted chair
of Palliser’s knowing it from outside time? “
He had a feeling that there was another corollary just round the corner
of his mind and strained to find it. But it avoided him for the moment.
He looked over his shoulder to find that the inspector was going, and
as soon as the departure was achieved rushed across the room to
Palliser. “Now,” he said, “what ‘has happened? 0 never mind about your
fly-blown policeman. What has happened ?”
“Nothing has happened,” Palliser said staring. “It evidently doesn’t
work in the future.”
“You seem jolly sure about it,” Sir Giles said. “How do you know? You
wanted to be as you would be at twelve, didn’t you? Well, how do you
know you’re not? You seem to remember, I know; so do I”
“Well then,” Palliser argued-“Yes, I see what you mean. This is merely
knowledge—premature knowledge? Umph. Well, let’s return to eleven-thirty.” He took a step towards the safe, but Sir Giles caught him by
the wrist. “Don’t do that, you fool,” he said. “Why the hell didn’t I
see it before? If you once go back, you’ll bind yourself to go on doing
the same thing—you must.”
Palliser sat down abruptly and the two looked at each other. “But you
said the present would be bound to become the future,” he objected.
“I know I did,” Sir Giles almost howled at him. “But don’t you see, you
fool, that the action of return must be made at the starting-point?
That’s why your oyster-stomached helot vanished; that’s the trick
that’s caught you now. I won’t be caught; there must be a way out and
I’ll find it.”
“Look here, Tumulty,” Palliser said, “let’s keep calm and think it
out. What do you mean by the action of return being made at the
starting-point?”
“O God,” Sir Giles moaned, “to be fastened to a man who doesn’t know
how to ask his mother for milk! I mean that you must condition your
experiment from without and not from within; you must define your
movement before you make it or your definition will be controlled by
it. You can say I will go and return in such and such a manner, but if
you only say I will go your return is ruled by sequence. Can’t you
think, Palliser?”
“Then we are in the future?” Palliser said, “and we can’t go back to
live that half-hour? Well, does it very much matter?” “If we are,” Sir
Giles said, “we-O it’s no good trying to
explain to you.” He began to walk about and then went back to the chair
in which he had been sitting originally and stared at it. “Now am I
there?” he asked grimly, “or am I here?”
There was a silence of some minutes. Then Palliser said again, “I still
can’t see why you’re so excited. That half-hour wasn’t of any
importance, surely?”
Sir Giles, having reached his limit of exasperation, became
unexpectedly gentle. He went back to Palliser and said almost sweetly,
“Well, don’t worry over it, don’t hurt your brain, but just try and
follow. If this is a forecast in consciousness, that consciousness is,
so to speak, housed somewhere. And it’s housed in your body. And
where’s your body? And how do you get your mind-time and your body-time
to agree?”
“My body is here,” Palliser said, patting it.
“O no,” Sir Giles said, still sweetly. “At least perhaps it is and
perhaps it isn’t. Perhaps all this is occupying a millionth part of a
second and we’re still sitting there.”
“But Pondon disappeared?” Palliser objected, “into his past, I suppose?
Mayn’t we have disappeared into our future?”
“I hope we have,” Sir Giles assented. “But we seem to remember—or to
know—what happened, don’t we? We seem to know that we talked and the
police came and so on? Did it happen or has it got to happen or hasn’t
it happened and will it never happen? If we will to return we seem to
me—but of course I’m a little child crooning on your knee—to be in a
constant succession of the same period. And if we don’t?”
“Well, we go on,” the Professor said.
“Till we become conscious of death?” Sir Giles asked. “And then what
happens? Till these apparent bodies die and corrupt and our minds
return to our real bodies and live it again—is that the truth? Years
and years and years and all in less than a second and all to be
repeated—do you like it, Palliser?”
“But Pondon disappeared,” the Professor said again.
“You keep on repeating that,” Sir Giles told him. “Don’t you see, you
cow, that the conditions may be different? Whatever the past is, it has
been in everyone’s knowledge; whatever the future is it hasn’t.”
“What do you propose to do about it, anyhow?” the Professor asked.
Sir Giles considered. “I propose to think over it for a few days,” he
said, “and see if I can think of any formula to find out, first where
that assistant of yours is and secondly where we are. Also to see if
Whitehall is doing anything, because I’m not going to be taken by
surprise by them, not under present conditions. So I shall go back to
London this afternoon.”
All the way to Euston—he didn’t want to use the Stone again at the
moment-Tumulty brooded over the problem that confronted him. He devised
several formulae for getting into touch with the unfortunate Mr.
Pondon; the most obvious experiment—that of willing him back—had been
tried by himself and the Professor on the previous evening without
success. It seemed that the Stone could not be used to control others;
its action was effective only over the action of whoever held it. Sir
Giles regretted this rather keenly; the possibility of disarranging
other people’s lives had appeared to him a desirable means of
experiment, since he was on the whole reluctant to conduct experiments
on himself. That state of being which lies between mysticism, madness,
and romanticism, had always been his chosen field, but it was a field
in which few suitable subjects grew. He found it impossible not to
desire to be able to dispose of objectionable people by removing them
to some past state of being, and he almost sent a telegram to Palliser
urging him to acquaint Mrs. Pondon and the police with the facts of the
case and to inquire whether the police “in the execution of their
duty,” would be bound to follow the vanished assistant to the day
before yesterday. Pondon had certainly gone of his own free will, even
if his superior had refrained from explaining the possibilities clearly
enough. However, Pondon could wait a few days. That morning, Sir Giles
had noticed in their short interview, he had cut himself while shaving;
it afforded Tumulty a certain pleasure to think of that small cut being
repeated again and again until he himself
had time, inclination, and knowledge to interfere. But the other
problem worried him more considerably. That missing half hour haunted
him; had he lived through it or had he not, and if he had not could
even the Stone release him from the necessity of doing so?
He began to wonder if the Stone could help him, but he didn’t see how,
unless it could present thoughts to his mind or to other people’s. If
there was someone he could trust to tell him what could be learnt from
such a trial of the Stone? He thought of Lord Arglay, a trained and
detached, and not unsympathetic, mind. Palliser was no good because
Palliser was mixed up with it. And you couldn’t go to everyone asking
them to help you look for half an hour you had mislaid. Also Arglay
would know if Whitehall were moving—not that he minded very much if it
were.
At Euston he took a taxi (to the Chief Justice’s.
Lord Arglay’s Saturday afternoon therefore broke suddenly into
activity. Some time after tea, while he was playing with the idea of
bringing Organic Law into the Stone’s sphere of activity, though he
felt certain the Haji would disapprove of any such use, he was startled
by the announcement that Mrs. Sheldrake had called. “Miss Burnett is
with her, sir,” the maid added.
“Now what on earth,” Lord Arglay said as he went to the drawingroom,
“is Chloe doing with -Mrs. Sheldrake? How did she get hold of her, I
wonder? and has she brought her here to be instructed or to be
frightene&”
It soon appeared however that if anyone were frightened it was Chloe
herself. Mrs. Sheldrake took the conversation into her own hands, with
a brief explanation of her connection with the Stone, and a light
reference to the fact that it had been, for the moment, mislaid. She
wanted to know, since Miss Burnett had mentioned Lord Arglay several
times, whether he claimed any rights in the Stone.
“Not in that particular Type,” Lord Arglay said.
“Type, Lord Arglay?” Cecilia asked. “How do you meanType?”
“The position is a little obscure,” the Chief Justice said, considering
rapidly Mrs. Sheldrake’s appearance and manner, Mr. Sheldrake’s riches
and position (which he had looked up), and the desirability of subduing
them both without antagonism. “I say Type because the Stones which
exist—and there are several—are apparently derivations from one
Original, though (and perhaps therefore) possessed of the same powers.
But how far they are to be regarded as being identical with it, for
proprietary reasons, I cannot at the moment say. Nor in whom the title
to the property inheres. I may add that certain foreign representatives
are deeply interested, and the Government is observing matters. I think
that in the present situation your husband should preserve the utmost
secrecy and caution. His title appears to me uncertain, both so far as
the acquisition of his Type is concerned and in the relation of that
Type to the Original.”
He delivered this with occasional pauses for meditation and with a
slight pomposity which he put on at necessary moments. Mrs. Sheldrake,
a little impressed, nevertheless appeared to receive it with frigidity.
“But, Lord Arglay,” she said, “we can’t be expected to sit quiet while
other people use our property in order to ruin our companies. I am
thinking of the effect it may have on Atlantic Airways. What is this
original you are talking about?”
“It is the centre of the derivations,” Lord Arglay said at random, but
ridiculously enough the phrase in Chloe’s mind suddenly connected
itself with “the End of Desire.” The chance and romantic words came to
her like a gospel, none the less emotionally powerful that at the
moment she didn’t understand it. What were the derivations? She had a
vague feeling that the sentence suggested Lord Arglay himself as the
centre though she
Comments (0)