Karta: Life-Inspiring Essays On Cognition, Consciousness & Causality by Santosh Jha (book suggestions txt) š
Read free book Ā«Karta: Life-Inspiring Essays On Cognition, Consciousness & Causality by Santosh Jha (book suggestions txt) šĀ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Santosh Jha
Read book online Ā«Karta: Life-Inspiring Essays On Cognition, Consciousness & Causality by Santosh Jha (book suggestions txt) šĀ». Author - Santosh Jha
So, what should ideally be the order of the dayā¦! Let us be realisticā¦ rationally simple in our approachesā¦. and have lots of trustā¦. in a stage we are, there probably aināt anything called āorder of the dayā. The huge bonus is sometimes what looks like a huge burden; what looks like an āun-patterned energyā of ādisorderā, is what analysts love to call āthe magicā. This truly is the magic of all societiesā¦. let the magic unfoldā¦. let this pinching energy of popular disorder unravel and undo thingsā¦. societies have seen them allā¦. often than notā¦.
**
Playing To The Gallery
Breathing in an absolutist space of personal optimality is tough, very suffocating. The pragmatists would insist ā āthriveā in the abundance of the suture zone of multiple utilities than āsurviveā in unilaterality of singular stream.
Itās a point of order. Darkness is preferable over light as later is a guarantee of absolute non-violence. Similar is the logic behind the advocacy of silence over speechā¦. but thenā¦ ! Somewhere, rationality must have taken sidesā¦. It looked like taken to have opted for āplaying to the galleryā, as most art and intellect often doā¦. even emotions love populismā¦.
Success is most preferred utilityā¦ and not that they donāt know that it is the ātriggerā of most violence; in all forms of ingenuity. Once a best paid soccer star said about one of his favorite winning goals; amazing, success has such strange utilitiesā¦.!
He said, he enjoyed the goal (ā¦the success attained) more than sex with his girlfriend! Peripheral rationalists would wonder, āhow could he? Can kicking a stupid ball in a wide net be a joy more intense and satisfying than sex? That too with your beloved?ā
Violence must be really kickingā¦. an association with success looks only natural! Someone can say, āhow demeaningā¦ can someone be such a brute to relate such a divine experience as body intimacies with a sadistic joy of making your opponent one down!ā
A somewhat politically correct assessment may say, ā yeahā¦ sounds a bit out of placeā¦. people canāt even choose their words the right wayā¦. or, probably, do they perceive intimacies the wrong way?... whateverā¦ā
This is itā¦. the suture zone of multiplicity of million choicesā¦.!
**
Maximum Can Carry Guilt Too
There was a runnerā¦. he would always finish second in a race. However best he attempted to bridge the gap between the winner and him, it could not come his wayā¦. and what added to his dismay was the fact that he would be just a meter behind the winner.
He consulted all experts but in vain. So, finally he landed to a psychologist. The psychologist said, āhow stupid, canāt you see the difference between winning and losing? It is just a meter! What you simply need to do is pump in just 10% extra effort when you are 10 meters away from the ropes and you will see the magic!ā
The runner said to himself, āYeahā¦ just 10% is not a big dealā¦. I must do itā¦ā
In the next race, he attempted the advice and ā¦..
As he approached the last 10 meters, he tried to push in more. As he was already giving the maximum he could, his effort to push in another 10% ruptured his lung and he died on the spot.
Yesā¦ there is always a guilt when we loseā¦ or do not get the desirable winā¦. nobody wants to failā¦. and the guilt pushes one to do that extra ā¦. in a wild hope of getting it right, outcomes may also go wild!
But thenā¦. a maximum is a maximumā¦.! If only there could be a maximum+10%.... there could have been many āwinnersā ā¦. But, in all pursuits of lifeā¦. especially in pursuance of something very special called relationshipsā¦. one always feels, enough is never enough and maximum is not beyond further elasticityā¦.
The guilt of ānot doing enoughā is always there as one helplessly sees things going wrongā¦. the race being lost! Even if there is no individual guilt, the collectivity would always advise you to put in just a tad extraā¦. hoping that there always is a possibility of maximization of maximumā¦.
Nobody believes you that you have given your āmaximumā for the success of an enterprise if it does not stand on the winnerās daisā¦ there will always be an advice to put in more. The ingenuity of self and the collective are those devils, which will always make you guilty of āunder-performanceā and easy it is for anyone to blame you for being a āsulky stupidāā¦.
But the runner, who died on the tracksā¦. never came firstā¦. when prolonged efforts do not result in what you expect, there might be a case for rethinking the āexpectationsā. Can we say that the runner should have understood and accepted that losing was his optimal destinyā¦. shouldn't have opted for popular destiny?
If only a better advice could comeā¦.! ā¦. awaited it isā¦.. but the advise be please that of an innocenceā¦. not the ingenuity. Till it comes, it is somehow accepted that better to carry blame than guiltā¦. guilt is killingā¦ blame only hurtsā¦.
**
Ask Tolstoy, Not Me
Late nightā¦. might have been 3 amā¦. when a bodyless mindedness took offā¦. on the journey of unconscious stupidities. Science says, 3-4 am is the time in the entire diurnal cycle of body, when all its hormones are at their ideal levelsā¦. and as this ideal state of being desires, body is in complete harmony of āselfā and conflicts of body and minds are least activeā¦.
As afflatus swung its arms for a flight of fancyā¦. it got a lift from what it introduced itself as ārasā (source of joys). Hormones are also some sort of ārasāā¦. and as ancient wisdom says, ājas ras tas jasā¦ (as is body hormones, so are youā¦)ā
Years back, had an encounter with ārasā, which impacted in its own way. Leo Tolstoy said about human life in his famous book Resurrection, āa man falls in a wellā¦ as he fell, he was fortunate to grab a rope that was hanging on the side of the well wall and as he hanged mid-way through, he saw a cobra beneath on the bottom of the dried well. Above, a rat started to tear the ropes with his sharp teeth. The man couldnāt climb up, he could just hold steady with the rope. It was sure, in a quick time, the rat would cut the rope and he would fall below where death awaited him. Suddenly, drops of honey started dropping in his mouth from a beehive on a tree above the well. The man knew that he had only a few minutes of life left but still, he relished the honey and became happy. He, for some moment, was able to keep his mind away from the finality of the occasionā¦.
Tolstoy summed up, this is life for all of us. The flip side of the story is a questionā¦. is this ārasāā¦ the honey of life, that goodā¦ that strong and capable that it could help humans take their minds away from the finality of the inevitability!
If yesā¦. what is this ārasā all about? Early humans have written āshastrasā(treatises) on the variety of ārasā. All forms of art, literature, music, dance, drama, etc have detailed mentions in these ancient scripts. However, these pursuits of ārasā are for learned and those who believe in attainment through exploration and expedition.
For simple and unflattering humans, the ārasā is a very simple emotion. Though, science is hell bent to blame this ārasā on another ārasā, a ānaughtyā body hormoneā¦.
The ārasā of love and compassionā¦. the honey of lifeā¦.! Let the learned be in a battle over how, why, what, when and where, etc. A common human who has a taste for this honey and bows to its magic is no less a wise. Ask Tolstoyā¦. not meā¦.
**
Receiving, An Act of Generosity!
He might be a confused manā¦ or probably an unresolved geniusā¦ he said, āā¦ask for helpā¦ receiving is an act of generosityā¦ā!
There are people in the world ā¦. very few of them actuallyā¦. who have the almightyās blessings to be in a position of āgivingāā¦. compassion comes naturally to all but recreating it in a empirical world is not easy taskā¦..
But still, āreceivingā is even more tough and hard to come as a feelingā¦. people usually are bereft of compassion and generosity to be able to receiveā¦. ego, ignorance, ingenuity block receptionā¦
There was a great soul in China. It is said that in his entire life, he said only a few words. He had thousands of disciples and followers but he never said anythingā¦.
One day he was taking a stroll in a jungle and as he passed through large trees, rivers, birds and lights peeping through leaves of the trees, he closed his eyes, tears rolling down his cheeks and a child-like smile adorned his face. A curious disciple asked him to say somethingā¦. he wished to know why he wept and smiled simultaneously ā¦.
As the disciple persisted with his question, the great soul got irritated and said, āā¦. everything around you is saying thingsā¦ the nature is so full of answers and you are pestering me for answersā¦. just be generous and fill your heart with compassionā¦. you will start receiving things which I can right now and you will understand ā¦.ā
There is so much love, so much joy, so much well-being, so much prudence and wisdom scattered around usā¦ in nature, in beings and non-beingsā¦. even within usā¦. let us just be simpleā¦. it will make us generousā¦. and then we all will start receiving all goodnessā¦.
**
Art of Internalizing Externalities
Someone said, āā¦nothing external to you has any power over youā¦ā!
Trueā¦very trueā¦ there are things scattered around us in a shape and size that may not be what our own āmake and positioningā wishes them to beā¦ thatās why they are āexternalā to us ā¦ and, not amenable to our receptionā¦
ā¦. We just need to internalize themā¦.! Around us, every day we see lots and lots of things which we all believe is wrong and not so goodā¦. but still, we do not learn from the mistakes of āothersāā¦ they remain external and hence, no have power to influence usā¦.
That's why, whenever, one has to point out any mistake or wrong in āothersāā¦ he or she must make it a point to say, āā¦ I have these wrongs in meā¦āā¦ this is how others can learn the āart of internalizingā thingsā¦ and as and when he or she does learn to do it, things become āinternalā to them and have power over them to influence themā¦.
ā¦. this is the only way to learnā¦ and to make others learnā¦
ā¦. Yeahā¦.! Saying this does have shades of what we call ānarcissismāā¦ but this is good oneā¦!
**
Of In-cognitive Inconveniences
Since childhood, our minds are trained like thatā¦. the transition from this mind-positioning even in later years of grown-up existentialism is not very easyā¦. it needs a lot of painful āunlearningāā¦. very very cruel for selfā¦. and, when we really wish this to happenā¦ do we have the time and positioningā¦?
We all live in a world with accentuated sense of āself-sustenanceāā¦. stretched to the limits of self-stupidityāā¦. and, the mind training is there to accept it as āsurvivalā bare-basics. The mind-training to accept and acclimatize only with ācognitiveā values and valuables leaves a lot many things wanting in life-propositions where most values and valuables fall in the beautiful world of rainbowish āincognitivesāā¦..
We grow to confront and create lot many incognitivesā¦. and, as our mind training is highly unsuitable to these incognitivesā¦. we stand confused and critically wanting in handling them to advantagesā¦.
ā¦. the incognitives of affection, compassion, assimilation, acceptance etc., often lands us in the domain of ācognitive conundrumāā¦. most young ones, even adults behave like a confused corn while exposed to love and compassion, which seem alien to their āselfā as it is not trained to accept them, being acclimatized only to ācognitivesā of accentuated sense of āself-symmetryāā¦.
The
Comments (0)