An Essay On The Trial By Jury by Lysander Spooner (free ebook reader for android TXT) π
1215 There Has Been No Clearer Principle Of English Or American
Constitutional Law, Than That, In criminal Cases, It Is Not Only The
Right And Duty Of Juries To Judge What Are The Facts, What Is The Law,
And What Was The Moral Intent Of The Accused; But That It Is Also
Their Right, And Their Primary And Paramount Duty, To Judge Of The
Justice Of The Law, And To Hold All Laws Invalid, That Are, In their
Opinion, Unjust Or Oppressive, And All Persons Guiltless In violating,
Or Resisting the Execution Of, Such Laws.
Read free book Β«An Essay On The Trial By Jury by Lysander Spooner (free ebook reader for android TXT) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Lysander Spooner
Read book online Β«An Essay On The Trial By Jury by Lysander Spooner (free ebook reader for android TXT) πΒ». Author - Lysander Spooner
Inhabitants, They Were, Indeed, Transplanted into A New
Territory, But Preserved unaltered all Their Civil And Military
Insfitutions. The Language Was Pure Saxon; Even The Names Of
Places, Which Often Remain While The Tongue Entirely Changes,
Were Almost All Affixed by The Conquerors; The Manners And
Customs Were Wholly German; And The Same Picture Of A Fierce And
Bold Liberty, Which Is Drawn By The Masterly Pen Of Tacitus, Will
Suit Those Founders Of The English Government. The King, So Far
From Being invested with Arbitrary Power, Was Only Considered as
The First Among The Citizens; His Authority Depended more On His
Personal Qualities Than On His Station; He Was Even So Far On A
Level With The People, That A Stated price Was Fixed for His
Head, And A Legal Fine Was Levied upon His Murderer, Which Though
Proportionate To His Station, And Superior To That Paid For The
Life Of A Subject, Was A Sensible Mark Of His Subordination To
The Community." 1 Hume, Appendix, L.
Stuart Says:
"The Saxons Brought Along With Them Into Britain Their Own
Customs, Language, And Civil Institutions. Free In germany, They
Renounced not Their Independence, When They Had Conquered.
Proud From Victory, And With Their Swords In their Hands, Would
They Surrender Their Liberties To A Private Man? Would Temporary
Laders, Limited in their Powers, And Unprovided in resources,
Ever Think To Usurp An Authority Over Warriors, Who Considered
Themselves As Their Equals, Were Impatient Of Control, And
Attached with Devoted zeal To Their Privileges? Or, Would They
Find Leisure To Form Resolutions, Or Opportunities To Put Them In
Practice, Amidst The Tumult And Confusion Of Those Fierce And
Bloody Wars, Which Their Nations First Waged with The Britons,
And Then Engaged in among Themselves? Sufficiently Flattered in
Leading the Armies Of Their Countrymen, The Ambition Of
Commanders Could As Little Suggest Such Designs, As The Liberty
Of The People Could Submit To Them. The Conquerors Of Britain
Retained their Independence; And This Island Saw Itself Again In
That Free State In which The Roman Arms Had Discovered it.
"The Same Firmness Of Character, And Generosity Of Manners,
Which, In general, Distinguished the Germans, Were Possessed in
An Eminent Degree By The Saxons; And While We Endeavor To Unfold
Their Political Institutions, We Must Perpetually Turn Our
Observation To That Masterly Picture In which The Roman Historian
Has Described these Nations. In the Woods Of Germany Shall We
Find The Principles Which Directed the State Of Land, In the
Different Kingdoms Of Europe; And There Shall We Find The
Foundation Of Those Ranks Of Men, And Of Those Civil
Arrangements, Which The Barbarians Everywhere Established; And
Which The English Alone Have Had The Good Fortune, Or The Spirit,
To Preserve." Stuart On The Constitution Of England, P. 59 - 61.
Chapter 3 (Additional Proofs Of The Rights And Duties Of Jurors) Section 1 (Weakness Of The Regal Authority) Pg 52
"Kings They (The Germans) Respected as The First Magistrates Of
The State; But The Authority Possessed by Them Was Narrow And
Limited." Ditto, P. 134.
"Did He, (The King,) At Any Time, Relax His Activity And Martial
Ardor, Did He Employ His Abilities To The Prejudice Of His
Nation, Or Fancy He Was Superior To The Laws; The Same Power
Which Raised him To Honor, Humbled and Degraded him. The
Customs And Councils Of His Country Pointed out To Him His
Duty; And If He Infringed on The Former, Or Disobeyed the Latter,
A Fierce People Set Aside His Authority.
"His Long Hair Was The Only Ornament He Affected, And To Be
Foremost To Attack An Enemy Was His Chief Distinction.
Engaged in every Hazardous Expedition, He Was A Stranger To
Repose; And, Rivalled by Half The Heroes Of His Tribe, He Could
Obtain Little Power. Anxious And Watchful For The Public
Interest, He Felt Every Moment His Dependence, And Gave
Proofs Of His Suhmission.
"He Attended the General Assembly Of His Nation, And Was Allowed
The Privilege To Harangue It First; But The Arts Of Persuasion,
Though Known And Respected by A Rude People, Were Unequally
Opposed to The Prejudices And Passions Of Men." Ditto, P. 135 - 6.
"The Authority Of A Saxon Mnarch Was Not More Considerable. The
Saxons Submitted not To The Arbitrary Rule Of Princes. They
Administered an Oath To Their Sovereigns, Which Bound Them To
Aeknowledge The Laws, And To Defend The Rights Of The Church And
People; And If They Forgot This Obligation, They Forfeited their
Office. In both Countries, A Price Was Affixed on Kings, A Fine
Expiated their Murder, As Well As That Of The Meanest Citizen;
And The Smallest Violation Of Ancient Usage,Or The Least Step
Towards Tyranny, Was Always Dangerous, And Often Fatal To Them."
Ditto, P. 189-40.
"They Were Not Allowed to Impose Taxes On The Kingdom." Ditto,
P. 146.
"Like The German Monarchs, They Deliberated in the General
Assembly Of The Nation; But Their Legislative Authority Was Not
Much Respected; And Their Assent Was Considered in no Better
Light Than As A Form. This, However, Was Their Chief Prerogative;
And They Employed it To Acquire An Ascendant In the State. To Art
And Insinuation They Turned, As Their Only Resource, And
Flattered a People Whom They Could Not Awe; But Address, And The
Abilities To Persuade, Were A Weak Compensation For The Absence
Of Real Power.
"They Declared war, It Is Said, And Made Peace. In both Cases,
However, They Acted as The Instruments Of The State, And Put In
Execution The Resolutions Which Its Councils Had Decreed. If,
Indeed, An Enemy Had Invaded the Kingdoms, And Its Glory And Its
Safety Were Concerned, The Great Lords Took The Field At The Call
Chapter 3 (Additional Proofs Of The Rights And Duties Of Jurors) Section 1 (Weakness Of The Regal Authority) Pg 53Of Their Sovereign. But Had A Sovereign Declared war Against A
Neighboring state, Without Requiring their Advice, Or If He Meant
To Revenge By Arms An Insult Offered to Him By A Subject, A
Haughty And Independent Nobility Refused their Assistance. These
They Considered as The Quarrels Of The King, And Not Of The
Nation; And In all Such Emergencies He Could Only Be Assisted by
His Retainers And Dependents." Ditto, P. 147 8.
"Nor Must We Imagine That The Saxon, Any More Than The German
Monarchs, Succeeded each Other In a Lineal Descent, [2] Or That
They Disposed of The Crown At Their Pleasure. In both Countries,
The Free Election Of The People Filled the Throne; And Their
Choice Was The Only Rule By Which Princes Reigned. The
Succession, Accordingly, Of Their Kings Was Often Broken And
Interrupted, And Their Depositions Were Frequent And Groundless.
The Will Of A Prince Whom They Had Long Respected, And The Favor
They Naturally Transferred to His Descendant, Made Them Often
Advance Him To The Royal Dignity; But The Crown Of His Ancestor
He Cnsidered as The Gift Of The People, And Neither Expected nor
Claimed it As A Right." Ditto, P. 151 3.
In Germany "It Was The Business Of The Great To Command In war,
And In peace They Distributed justice.
"The Princes In germany Were Earls In england. The Great
Contended in both Countries In the Number Of Their Retainers, And
In That Splendor And Magnificence Which Are So Alluring to A Rude
People; And Though They Joined to Set Bounds To Regal Power, They
Were Often Animated against Each Other With The Fiercest Hatred.
To A Proud And Impatient Nobility It Seemed little And Unsuiting
To Give Or Accept Compositions For The Injuries They Committed or
Received; And Their Vassals Adopting their Resentment And
Passions, War And Bloodshed alone Could Terminate Their Quarrels.
What Necessarily Resulted from Their Situation In society, Was
Continued as A Privilege; And The Great, In both Countries, Made
War, Of Their Private Authority, On Their Enemies. The Saxon
Earls Even Carried their Arms Against Their Sovereigns; And,
Surrounded with Retainers, Or Secure In fortresses And Castles,
They Despised their Resentment, And Defied their Power.
"The Judges Of The People, They Presided in both Countries In
Courts Of Law. [3] The Particular Districts Over Which They
Exerted their Authority Were Marked out In germany By The Council
Of The State; And In england Their Jurisdiction Extended over The
Fiefs And Other Territories They Possessed. All Causes, Both
Civil And Criminal, Were Tried before Them; And They Judged,
Except In cases Of The Utmost Importance, Without Appeal. They
Were Even Allowed to Grant Pardon To Criminals, And To Correct By
Their Clemency The Rigors Of Justice. Nor Did The Sovereign
Exercise Any Authority In their Lands. In these His Officers
Formed no Courts, And His Writ Was Disregarded.
"They Had Officers, As Well As The King, Who Collected their
Revenues, And Added to Their Greatness; And The Inhabitants Of
Chapter 3 (Additional Proofs Of The Rights And Duties Of Jurors) Section 1 (Weakness Of The Regal Authority) Pg 54Their Lands They Distinguished by The Name Of Subjects.
"But To Attend The General Assembly Of Their Nation Was The Chief
Prerogative Of The German And Saxon Princes; And As They
Consulted the Interest Of Their Country, And Eliberated
Concerning matters Of State, So In the King'S Court, Of Which
Also They Were Members, They Assisted to Pronounce Judgment In
The Complaints And Appeals Which Were Lodged in it." Ditto, P.
158 To 165.
Henry Says:
"Nothing can Be More Evident Than This Important Truth; That Our
Anglo-Saxon Kings Were Not Absolute Monarchs; But That Their
Powers And Prerogatives Were Limited by The Laws And Customs Of
The Country. Our Saxon Ancestors Had Been Governed by Limited
Monarchs In their Native Seats On The Continent; And There Is Not
The Least Appearance Or Probability That They Relinquished their
Liberties, And Submitted to Absolute Government In their New
Settlements In this Island. It Is Not To Be Imagined that Men,
Whose Reigning passion Was The Love Of Liberty, Would Willingly
Resign It; And Their New Sovereigns, Who Had Been Their
Fellow-Soldiers, Had Certainly No Power To Compel Them To Such A
Resignation." 3 Henry'S History Of Great Britain, 358.
Mackintosh Says:"The Saxon Chiefs, Who Were Called. Kings,
Originally Acquired power By The Same Natural Causes Which Have
Gradually, And Everywhere, Raised a Few Men Above Their Fellows.
They Were, Doubtless, More Experienced, More Skillful, More
Brave, Or More Beautiful, Than Those Who Followed them. * * A
King was Powerful In war By The Lustre Of His Arms, And The
Obvious Necessity Of Obedience. His Influence In peace Fluctuated
With His Personal Character. In the Progress Of Usage His Power
Became More Fixed and More Limited. * * It Would Be Very
Unreasonable To
Comments (0)