Chess Strategy by Edward Lasker (inspirational novels .TXT) π
1. ... K-Q3
2. P-B3 K-B3
3. K-B4 and wins.
This settles all typical end-games of King and pawn against King. There is, however, one exception to the rules set out, namely, when a ROOK'S PAWN is concerned. Here the isolated King always succeeds in drawing if he can reach the corner where the pawn has to queen, for he cannot be driven out again. The Rook's pawn affords another opportunity for the weaker side to draw. Diagram 55 will illustrate this, and similar positions are of frequent occurrence in practice. Here Black draws with 1. ... K-B5. As he threatens to capture the pawn, White must play 2. P-R4. Then after the reply K-B4, White is still unable to cut the opponent off from the corner with K-Kt7, as the loss of the pawn is still threatened through K-Kt5. And after 3. P-R5 Black attains the position which is typical for this end-game, namely the opposition against the King on the Rook's file. The latter cannot escape without giving up the contested corner, and the game is drawn. 3. ... K-B3; 4. K-R7, K-B2; 5. K-R8, K-B1; 6. P-R6, K-B2; 7. P-R7, K-B1: and White is stalemated.
Diag. 55
Read free book Β«Chess Strategy by Edward Lasker (inspirational novels .TXT) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Edward Lasker
- Performer: 0486205282
Read book online Β«Chess Strategy by Edward Lasker (inspirational novels .TXT) πΒ». Author - Edward Lasker
Here White can force a win in the following way: 1. RxP, P-Kt6; 2. R-R6, PxP; 3. RxP, K-B2; 4. R-B2, B-Kt5; 5. R-B4, B-R4; 6. P-B4! The Black pawn position must first be torn up, if it is to be attacked successfully.
Now Blackβs defeat is inevitable, whether the pawn is taken or not. The sequel would be 6. β¦ PxP; 7. RxP, after which the Rook goes to KR5 and the Rookβs pawn must fall, or: 6. β¦ K-Kt3; 7. PxP, PxP; 8. R-B6ch, K-Kt2; 9. R-B5, and the Bishopβs pawn is lost, unless Black gives up his passed pawn. In this case Black loses also: 9. R-B5, B-Q1; 10. KxP, K-Kt3; 11. K-Q3, B-B3; 12. R-B6, K-Kt2; 13. K-K4, K-Kt3; 14. R-R6, K-B2; 15. K-B5, B-Q1; 16. R-KKt6, followed by RxP, etc.
The Queen against a minor piece wins so easily that it is not necessary to give an example. It only remains to discuss end-
βββββββββββββ
8 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | ^R | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | | | | | | #P | #K | |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | #P | | | | | | #P | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | #P | | | | | ^P | #P |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | #B | | | ^P | | ^P |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | ^P | | | #P | ^K | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | | | | | | | | |
βββββββββββββ
A B C D E F G H
Diag. 71
games of QUEEN V. QUEEN, ROOK V. ROOK, AND MINOR PIECE V. MINOR PIECE, in which one player has a majority of pawns, or an equal number of pawns, one of which is passed. As a rule the extra
βββββββββββββ
8 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | | #B | | | | | | #P |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | | | | | | | | ^P |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | ^Kt| | ^K | | #P | #K | |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | | | | | | | | |
βββββββββββββ
A B C D E F G H
Diag. 72
pawn leads to a win. There are, however, exceptions frequently recurring in practice to which I must refer specially.
Diagram 72 shows an end-game with a Rookβs pawn and a Bishop βof the wrong colour.β
White draws with 1. Kt-Q2, P-B7; 2. Kt-K4ch, K-Kt7; 3. KtxP, and draws, as Black, in order to capture the White pawn, after KxKt must give the White King access to the Rookβs square, from which he could not be dislodged except by a Bishop on White squares.
In Diagram 73 White cannot win although his Bishop is of the βright colourβ by 1. P-B7, KtxP; 2. BxKt, and White cannot win the Rookβs pawn. He can only attack the pawn from Kt7 or Kt8, both of which are inaccessible as the Black King gets to Kt1. It is a stalemate position. If the White
βββββββββββββ
8 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | | | | | #K | | | #P |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | | | ^P | | #Kt| | | ^P |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | | | | ^K | ^B | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | | | | | | | | |
βββββββββββββ
A B C D E F G H
Diag. 73
pawn were still at R5, Whiteβs King could attack the pawn from R6 and secure the win.
In the position given, White could only win by keeping his passed pawn, and indeed it is possible to win by gaining a move with the Bishop. In the diagram it is Whiteβs move. Black with the move could not play K-B2 because K-Q6 would follow. The Knight would have to move, allowing the pawn to queen. Therefore White must try to bring about the same position with Black to move. He can do this, for instance, in the following way:
1. B-Kt3, K-B2 (now 2. K-Q6 would be bad on account of Kt-Q5, 3. P-B7, Kt-Kt5ch, and KtxP); 2. B-R2, K-K2; 3. B-K5. Now Whiteβs plan has succeeded; the same position has occurred, and it is Blackβs move. As mentioned before, the King must not move, but Knightβs moves are of no avail. If 3. β¦ Kt-Kt4; 4. B-B6ch, the Knight is lost, or alternatively the pawn queens. On 3. β¦ Kt-B1, B-Q6ch decides, and on 3. β¦ Kt-Q1; 4. B-B6ch, K-K1; 5. BxKt would follow.
On this occasion I should like to point out that it is impossible to gain a move with a Knight, as a square which is accessible to him in an odd number of moves cannot be reached by him in an even number. A simple instance is Diagram 74.
βββββββββββββ
8 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | | | | | | #K | | ^K |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | | | ^Kt| | | | | ^P |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | | | | | | | | |
βββββββββββββ
A B C D E F G H
Diag. 74
White loses, having the move. 1. K-R8, Kt-K4; 2. K-R2, Kt-Q2; 3. K-R8, Kt-B1; 4. P-R7, Kt-Kt3 mate.
Black with the move cannot win, as he cannot bring about the same position with White to move.
In end-games of BISHOP V. BISHOP, of which we have already had an example in Diagram 70, an extra pawn wins in most cases if the Bishops are of the same colour. It is generally possible to force an exchange of Bishops and obtain one of the well-known pawn endings.
On the other hand an ending with Bishops of different colour leads mostly to a draw, frequently even against a majority of two pawns. The position in Diagram 75 is a draw, because it is impossible for the White King to get round his Kt pawn to drive off the Bishop.
βββββββββββββ
8 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | | | | | | | #B | |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | | #P | | #K | | | ^P | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | | ^P | | | ^K | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | ^P | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | | | | ^B | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | | | | | | | | |
βββββββββββββ
A B C D E F G H
Diag. 75
With two passed pawns distant from each other, a win can generally be forced, as in the following position (Diagram 76).
βββββββββββββ
8 | | | | #B | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | | | | | | #K | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | | ^P | | | | ^P | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | | | | ^K | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | | ^B | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | | | | | | | | |
βββββββββββββ
A B C D E F G H
Diag. 76
The King moves up to the pawn, the progress of which is barred by the Bishop (not the King). He thereby forces the sacrifice of the Bishop. If the Black King comes to the rescue of the Bishop, the other pawn proves Blackβs downfall.
1. K-K4, K-K2; 2. K-Q5, K-Q2; 3. B-K4, B-K2; 4. P-Kt6, B-Q1; 5. P-Kt7, K-B2; 6. K-K6, and wins; or 5. β¦ B-B2; 6. P-B6, B-R7; 6. B-B2, K-K1; 8. K-K6, B-Kt1; 9. B-Kt6ch, K-B1; 10. K-Q7, and wins.
When the pawns are united, one should observe this rule: if they are attacked, they should, if possible, move to squares of the colour of the opposing Bishop.
Therefore in the position set out in Diagram 77 White should not play P-B5, but P-K5. After 1. P-B5 there is no possible chance for White to assume the command of the Black squares, and in order to advance the pawns it is necessary
βββββββββββββ
8 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | | | #B | | | | #K | |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | | | ^P | ^P | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | | | | | | ^K | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | | | | ^B | | | | |
βββββββββββββ
A B C D E F G H
Diag. 77
to force access to both White and Black squares. In the present instance play would proceed on these lines:
1. P-K5, B-R4; 2. K-K3, K-B2; 3. K-K4, K-K2; 4. P-B5, B-Kt5; 5. P-B6ch, K-B1; 6. P-K6, B-R6; 7. B-R4, B-Kt5. White can only get through with the Kingβs Pawn, as P-B7 is unavailing on the grounds set out above. But in order to play P-K7, the square K7 must first be covered a second time, so that the Bishop cannot be given up for the two pawns. Therefore: 8. K-Q5, B-R6 (B-B6; P-K7ch); 9. K-B6, K-K1; 10. K-B7ch, K-B1; 11. K-Q7, and wins.
In end-games with one Knight on each side, an extra pawn usually decides the game much in the same way as in end-games with Bishops of the same colour; frequently even with equal pawns, the possession of a passed pawn is sufficient, as it keeps either the King or the Knight busy, so that there is only one piece available for the defence of the pawns. An instructive example is the end-game Ed. Lasker-Rotlevi on p. 100.
End-games with Rook against Rook are the most frequent, as well as the most difficult. Here the possession of an extra pawn is seldom sufficient for a win, unless the stronger side has also an advantage in the greater mobility of the Rook. Diagram 78 is typical of such cases, frequent in practice, in
βββββββββββββ
8 | | | | #R | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | | | ^R | | | | #P | #K |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | ^P | | | | | | | #P |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | | | | | ^P | |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | | | | | | | ^K | ^P |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | | | | | | | | |
βββββββββββββ
Comments (0)