Chess Strategy by Edward Lasker (inspirational novels .TXT) π
1. ... K-Q3
2. P-B3 K-B3
3. K-B4 and wins.
This settles all typical end-games of King and pawn against King. There is, however, one exception to the rules set out, namely, when a ROOK'S PAWN is concerned. Here the isolated King always succeeds in drawing if he can reach the corner where the pawn has to queen, for he cannot be driven out again. The Rook's pawn affords another opportunity for the weaker side to draw. Diagram 55 will illustrate this, and similar positions are of frequent occurrence in practice. Here Black draws with 1. ... K-B5. As he threatens to capture the pawn, White must play 2. P-R4. Then after the reply K-B4, White is still unable to cut the opponent off from the corner with K-Kt7, as the loss of the pawn is still threatened through K-Kt5. And after 3. P-R5 Black attains the position which is typical for this end-game, namely the opposition against the King on the Rook's file. The latter cannot escape without giving up the contested corner, and the game is drawn. 3. ... K-B3; 4. K-R7, K-B2; 5. K-R8, K-B1; 6. P-R6, K-B2; 7. P-R7, K-B1: and White is stalemated.
Diag. 55
Read free book Β«Chess Strategy by Edward Lasker (inspirational novels .TXT) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Edward Lasker
- Performer: 0486205282
Read book online Β«Chess Strategy by Edward Lasker (inspirational novels .TXT) πΒ». Author - Edward Lasker
Such manoeuvres, in the course of which pieces are pinned and attacked, are illustrated in Diagram 90. The most obvious move, which initiates an attack and at the same time completes the development of the minor pieces, is B-Kt5. Attacks by means of such devices are so frequent and varied that it will be necessary to treat them at some length, which I now propose to do. I should also add that, with regard to Diagram 90, the student will derive lasting benefit from a thorough study of the position, and will thus improve his power to judge of the desirability, or otherwise, of obtaining open files, diagonals, doubled pawns, etc. After B-KKt5, the threat is to attack the Knight a second and third time with Kt-Q5, and Q-B3, after moving the KKt away. As Blackβs KKt is only supported twice, and there is no chance of bringing up more forces for its defence, Black must undertake something to provide against the threatened onslaught.
The most natural plan is to develop the QB at K3, from where it can be exchanged for the Knight should Kt-Q5 be played. The doubled pawn, which White could force by exchanging the Bishops, is in no way detrimental to Blackβs game. On the contrary, the opening of the file for the Rook, with the attendant chance of playing P-Q4 supported by the doubled pawn, gives Black the advantage.
The doubled pawn which Black obtains after 2. Kt-Q5, BxKt; 3. PxB (or 3. BxB), Kt-K2; 4. BxKt, would also be of no help to White. The apparent weakness created in Blackβs game at KB3 and KR3 by the disappearance of the KtP does not assist White in this case, because the pieces which could take advantage of such a weakness, the QB and the Kt at Q5, have been exchanged. There only remains the KKt and the Q for an immediate attack, whilst the Black Rook will soon get into effective action on the open Knightβs file, e.g. 5. Q-Q2, K-R1; 6. Q-R6, Kt-Kt3; 7. Kt-R4, KtxKt; 8. QxKt, Q-K2, followed by the doubling of the Rooks on the Kt file. Considerations of a similar nature would tend to show that 1. B-Kt5, Kt-K2; 2. BxKt, PxB is in favour of Black. The White QB, which is so effective in taking advantage of weaknesses at Blackβs KB3 and R3, has been exchanged. The Queenβs Knight is not available for attack on the KBP, as it would be exchanged or else driven off in time by P-B3. Compared with the position considered above, which occurs after 1. β¦ B-K3, 2. Kt-Q5, Black has the further advantage of maintaining his QB, which makes it possible to push the weak KBP on to his fourth, and either exchange it or push it still further to B5, a useful and secure position.
Matters would be different were Black to allow his Kingβs wing to be broken up without getting rid of Whiteβs dangerous pieces by exchanges. Let us consider what happens, if Black takes no measures against Kt-Q5, but only prevents Whiteβs ultimate Q-B3 by pinning the Knight with B-KKt5. White gains a decisive advantage by bringing his Queen into play before Black is able to secure himself against the threatened combined attack of Q and B, or alternately Q and Kt by K-R1, R-Kt1-Kt3. I will give two examples of how the whole game now centres on the attack and defence of the points weakened by the disappearance of the KtP, and how White pushes home his advantage in the one instance with the help of the B, in the other by the cooperation of the Kt.
I. 1. B-KKt5, B-KKt5; 2. Kt-Q5, Kt-Q5; 3. Q-Q2, BxKt?; 4. BxKt, PxB; 5. Q-R6, and there is no reply to the threat of KtxPch and QxP mate, except through the sacrifice of the Q. Forcing the exchange of Knights is of no avail, for after 5. β¦ Kt-K7ch; 6. K-R1, BxPch; 7. KxB, Kt-B5ch; 8. KtxKt, PxKt; 9. K-R1, White occupies the Kt file first and wins easily: 9. β¦ K-R1; 10. R-KKt1, R-KKt1; 11. RxR, QxR; 12. R-KKt1 followed by mate or loss of the Queen.
II. 3. Q-Q2, P-B3; 4. KtxKtch, PxKt; 5. B-R4! BxKt; 6. Q-R6, Kt-K7ch; 7. K-R1, BxPch; 8. KxB, Kt-B5ch; 9. K-R1, Kt-Kt3. Now Black has succeeded in interrupting the White Queenβs action on the BP. But it has taken many moves, with the sole result that Blackβs Queenβs Knight is better placed. All the other pieces, however, occupy the positions they took up in the opening. The Black Knight, moreover, is only supported by the RP until Black manages to block the White Bishopβs diagonal by P-Q4. Meanwhile White has gained a big start, and is ready to occupy the open file with his Rooks. The sequel might be: 10. P-Q4!, BxP (if PxP; 11. P-K5!!, QPxP; 12. R-KKt1, etc.); 11. P-B3, B-Kt3; 12. QR-Q1, K-R1; 13. R-KKt1, Q-K2; 14. R-Q3, R-KKt1; 15. R-R3, R-Kt2 (KtxB; 16. QxRPch!!); 16. R-B3, followed by BxP (B6).
Taking it all in all, we see from the foregoing that the pinning of the Black Knight can only be injurious to Black if he does not take timely measures to provide against Whiteβs Kt-Q5, which threatens to concentrate more forces for the attack on KB6 than Black is able to mobilise for its defence.
Beginners, after having experienced frequent trouble through their inadequate defence of this kind of attack, try to avoid their recurrence by making such pinning moves impossible from the first and playing P-R3 on whichever side the pin is threatened. Apart from the loss of time, on which I remarked at length when discussing the opening, such pawn moves have various other drawbacks.
With every pawn move it should be considered whether the squares protected by the pawn before it has moved may not need the support of that pawn at a later stage. This is particularly the case with regard to squares in front of the castled King. If one of those pawns pushes on, the squares which have lost its protection frequently offer an opening for a direct attack by the enemyβs pieces on the King.
A second consideration is the fact that the advancing pawn itself becomes a target for an assault in which the opponent, moving up a pawn on the next file, brings his Rooks into play, or in which he sacrifices a piece for the advanced pawn and the one that protects it, thus robbing the King of the protection he sought to obtain in castling.
The following examples will contribute much to the understanding of this most important subject, the grasp of which will mean a great step forward for the student.
The position in Diagram 93 is from a game v. Scheve-Teichmann (Berlin, 1907). White played 1. P-R3 in order to avoid the pinning of his Knight through B-Kt5. The move is not unjustified, as the Knight is required for the support of the square at Q4. The pawn move, however, has the drawbacks enumerated above, and White must think of keeping a sufficiency of pieces for the fight on the Kingβs wing, in order to prevent Black from utilising the weakness thus created for a combined assault by superior forces.
βββββββββββββ
8 | #R | | #B | | #K | | #Kt| #R |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | #B | #P | #P | | #Q | #P | #P | #P |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | #P | | #Kt| #P | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | ^P | | | | #P | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | ^B | ^P | ^P | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | ^P | | | ^Kt| | |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | | ^P | | | | ^P | ^P | ^P |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | ^R | ^Kt| ^B | ^Q | | ^R | ^K | |
βββββββββββββ
A B C D E F G H
Diag. 93
In this case White does not take precautionary measures, and succumbs in a surprisingly short time.
1. β¦ Kt-B3; 2. PxP? With this move White opens the diagonal for Blackβs KB for no apparent reason. 2. β¦ QKtxP; 3. KtxKt? Instead of providing for the defence of his Kingβs wing, White exchanges one of the Kingβs side pieces, 3. β¦ QxKt; 4. Kt-Q2, BxP! White has provoked this sacrifice by his last two moves. The KBP is pinned, and the Q enters by way of her Kt6, the protection of which was given up by pushing on the RP. The rest is easy; 5. PxB, Q-Kt6ch; 6. K-R1, QxPch; 7. K-Kt1, Kt-Kt5; 8. Kt-B3, Q-Kt6ch; 9. K-R1, BxP; 10. resigns.
Diagram 94 shows a position from a game Marshall-Burn (Ostend, 1907). Strong in the knowledge that the Black Queenβs side pieces are not developed, and can only with difficulty be of assistance in the defence of the Kingβs side because of their limited mobility, White takes advantage of the weakness created by the advance of the Black KKt pawn to his third, and initiates an immediate assault on the Kingβs stronghold.
βββββββββββββ
8 | #R | | #B | #Q | | #R | #K | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | #P | #P | #P | #Kt| #P | #P | #B | #P |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | | | | #P | | #Kt| #P | |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | | | | | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | | ^P | | ^B | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | | ^B | ^P | ^Kt| | |
|βββββββββββββ|
2 | ^P | ^P | ^P | ^Kt| | ^P | ^P | ^P |
|βββββββββββββ|
1 | ^R | | | ^Q | ^K | | | ^R |
βββββββββββββ
A B C D E F G H
Diag. 94
1. P-KR4, R-K1; 2. P-R5. This forces open the Rookβs file. If the pawn were still at Kt2, Black would simply let White push on to R6 and then reply with P-KKt3. 2. β¦ KtxP; 3. RxKt, White concludes the game in brilliant style. Blackβs wrong development has given a welcome opportunity for sacrificial combinations. Now the KB has an open diagonal, the pawn position is broken, and Whiteβs Q and R have no difficulty in using the Rookβs file for a deadly attack. 3. β¦ PxR; 4. BxPch, KxB; 5. Kt-Kt5ch, K-Kt3 (if K-Kt1, then 6. QxP, Kt-B3; 7. QxPch, K-R1; 8. Castles, etc.); 6. QKt-B3, P-K4; 7. Kt-R4ch, K-B3; 8. Kt-R7ch, K-K2; 9. Kt-B5ch, K-K3; 10. KtxBch, K-K2; 11. Kt-B5ch, K-K3; 12. P-Q5ch, KxKt; 13. QxPch, K-K5; 14. Castles, followed by P-B3 or R-Q4 mate.
In cases where both sides have already castled on the same wing, and the opponent has weakened his position by pushing on one of the pawns of that wing, it is seldom advisable to start an attack with the advance of one of the pawns in front of the King, as the latterβs position would be weakened. An attack of this kind is only justified if there is a prospect of concentrating with all speed a superior force before the opponent has time for a counter attack.
The Black position in Diagram 95 illustrates one much favoured by βnaturalβ players. Here the advance of the
βββββββββββββ
8 | #R | | | #Q | | #R | #K | |
|βββββββββββββ|
7 | #P | #B | #P | #P | #Kt| #P | #B | #P |
|βββββββββββββ|
6 | | #P | #Kt| | #P | | #P | |
|βββββββββββββ|
5 | | | | | ^P | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
4 | | | | ^P | | | | |
|βββββββββββββ|
3 | | | ^Kt| ^B | ^B | ^Kt| |
Comments (0)