The Annals of Willenhall by Frederick William Hackwood (13 ebook reader TXT) π
The Court House although now used as a licensed public house, was originally built as the name implies as a Court, the house where the Lord of the Manor and tenants could meet, it was built by Lord Dudley. The last court case was held in 1925. It was also here that the meeting of the Boundaries Commission was held on the 13th April 1867 that Coseley became a separate urban district.
There was a yard close by, adjacent to the church where stray animals could be impounded by the local constable.
Read free book Β«The Annals of Willenhall by Frederick William Hackwood (13 ebook reader TXT) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Frederick William Hackwood
Read book online Β«The Annals of Willenhall by Frederick William Hackwood (13 ebook reader TXT) πΒ». Author - Frederick William Hackwood
WOLVERHAMPTON.--A Collegiate Church; impropriate to the King's Majestie or the Dean of Windsor; value of lands belonging to it is 600 pounds per annum. There be seven Prebends and a Sexton under them; seven stipendiaries; the allowance for four of them is ten nobles apiece; for the other three 6 pounds apiece. Six of the Prebends be held by Sir Gualter Levison; the other is held by another. The rent reserved to the Dean of Windsor, 38 pounds. People 4,000. Many Popish; many Recusants.
Chappells 3:--
Pelsall; curate's stipend 4 pounds; no preacher. Willenhall; curate hath no stipend reserved; no preacher. Bilston; curate hath no stipend reserved; no preacher.These curates, especially two of them, Mounsell and Cooper, be notorious and dissolute men.
Such was the lamentable state of the local clergy at that time, when the population of Wolverhampton, with all its outlying parts, is set down at 4,000 only. A few words of explanation will perhaps be necessary to make the foregoing extract more intelligible to the general reader.
A "noble" was a coin of the value of 6s. 8d.; a "recusant" was one who disputed the authority and supremacy of the Crown in matters ecclesiastical, whether Papist or Puritan; while to "impropriate" church property was to place it in the hands of a layman.
Four or five more extracts from this interesting Survey, relating to other parts of this neighbourhood, may not be out of place to quote here:--
BYSHBY.--Parsonage, impropriate; worth 40 pounds per annum; vicarage worth 30 pounds; patron, Sir Edward Littleton; many Popish; many Recusants. Incumbent a mere worldling; no preacher.
TETNALL.--A college dissolved; five prebends and a deane; impropriate to the King's Majestie; worth 300 marks. One prebend is held by Sir Richard Leveson; one by Mr. Gualter Wriotesley; two by Richard Cresswell. Curate's stipend, 20 marks; no preacher.
CODSALL.--Prebend of Tetnall. Curate-prebendary a loose liver; no preacher.
WOMBOURNE.--Parsonage, impropriate, held by Hugh Wriotesley, Esquire; worth 40 pounds; vicarage worth 26 pounds; patron, Edward L. Dudley.
PEN.--Parsonage; impropriate to the vicars of Lichfield; worth 20 pounds; vicarage worth as much; patrons, the Vicars of Lichfield. Vicar --; no preacher.
This selection of extracts will serve to enlighten the reader upon two important points in the history of the Church; the first is the amount of church revenue which had already found its way into the pockets of the laity; and the other is the lamentable necessity there was at that period to provide the English clergy with ready-made Homilies. These Homilies were ordered (as the Prayer Book informs us, in the XXXV. Article), to be read "diligently and distinctly" in the churches by the Ministers.
Chapater XII(Before the Reformation--and After.)
It may be assumed that Willenhall Church has been dedicated to St. Giles from the first, because the period for holding the dedicatory Wake synchronises with St. Gile's day (September 1st), making allowance for the eleven days' difference effected in 1752 between the Old Style and the New Style calendars. As the Protestant Reformers took objection to non-Biblical saints (West Bromwich Church was altered from St. Clement's to All Saints'), a dedication to St. Giles may safely be accepted as a pre-Reformation one; and as St. Giles was the patron saint of cripples, he doubtless retained his popularity here on account of the reputation for healing qualities acquired by the Willenhall "Holy Well"--of which more anon. But in addition to its Wake, the town seems to have possessed in mediaeval times a much frequented Summer Fair, held on Trinity Sunday. Our knowledge of this interesting fact is derived from the records of the Court of Star Chamber.
This court was established by Henry VII. to deal with routs, riots, and all other cases not sufficiently provided for by the common law; but the oppression practised by the unscrupulous abuse of its indefinite jurisdiction led to its summary extinction in the reign of Charles I.
The case to be quoted is one of an alleged riot in the year 1498 (13 Henry VII.), in which the men of Wednesbury were deeply involved. These turbulent townsmen seem to have made themselves notorious for riotous behaviour at various times; as witness the historic Wesley Riots of 1744, their march on Birmingham to regulate the price of malt in 1782, and their attack on the same town during the Church and King Riots in 1791.
It would appear that a company of Mummers, made up of performers from Wolverhampton, Wednesbury, and Walsall, were regularly in the habit of going round to the neighbouring Fairs, and performing to the accompaniment of pipe and tabor a Morris-dance, in which the characters were dressed up for the then popular dramatic interlude of "Robin Hood," including Maid Marian, Friar Tuck, and all the rest of them.
The hobby-horse doth hither prance, Maid Marian and the Morris-dance.
It would be interesting to discover why, in this local version, the character called the "Abbot of Marham" was introduced into the play--Marham nunnery was situated in Norfolk, a long way from the usual forest scenes of Sherwood and Needwood.
The money collected at these al fresco performances was applied to maintaining the fabric of the three parish churches; but, for some reason unknown, there had evidently grown up a deadly feud between the Wednesbury and the Walsall contingents. This was the cause of all the trouble.
The "John Beamont" mentioned was John Beaumont, Esquire, lord of the manor of Wednesbury, a benefactor of the parish church there, and a patron of a Walsall Chantry. It will be noticed that the quoted document speaks of the "Church of the lordship," not "of the parish"; and also, that the prefix "Sir" was then used to a parson's name, as we should now use the prefix "Rev."
Here is the text of the plaints entered by the terrorised "orators" of Walsall, together with the affidavits put in as rejoinders; the archaic spelling is retained only in a few places just to indicate the style of English then employed in the law courts; and it is interesting to note that Midlanders had those peculiar vowel sounds in olden times, and pronounced "fetch" as "fatch," and "gather" as "gether"--just as the illiterate among them still do:--
TO THE KING OUR SOVEREIGN LORD--
Humbly sheweth unto your highness, your faithful subject and true liegeman, Roger Dyngley, Mayor of Walsall; and Thomas Rice, of the same town--That whereas your said orators on Wednesday next before Trinity Sunday, the 13th year of your reign, were in God's peace and yours, in your said town of Walsall--thither came one John Cradeley, of Wednesbury, and Thomas Morres, of Dudley, in your said county; and then and there made affray upon the said Thomas Rice, "and hym soore wounded and bett" [beat], so that he was in peril of his life.
Whereupon the said Mayor, with other inhabitants, did arrest John Cradeley and Thomas Morres, and there did put them in prison according to your laws, there to remain till it were known whether the said Thomas Rice should live or die.
And incontinent thereupon one John Beamonde, "Squyer," Walter Levison, of Wolverhampton, Richard Foxe, priest, of the same town, and one Robert Marshall, of Wednesbury, "arreysed" and riotously assembled themselves at Wednesbury with other riotous persons to the number of 200 men, arrayed in manner of war, that is to say, with bows, arrows, bills, and "gleves" [long daggers], with other unlawful weapons there gathered and assembled, to the intent to have come to have destroyed your said town of Walsall, saying openly that they would "fache" out of prison the said John Cradeley and Thomas Morres, and destroy your said town of Walsall.
And thereupon William Harper and William Wilkes, Justices of the Peace, charged the said riotous persons to keep the peace upon a great pain to be forfeited to your grace. By reason whereof the said rioters for that time ceased from further riot.
And whereas the said Justices of the Peace, knowing the said rioters intended to make more riot, and to execute their malice in doing some mischief or hurt to the said town or to the inhabitants thereof, for eschewing any riot or breach of the peace commanded the inhabitants of Walsall, Wednesbury, and of divers other towns, their adherents, that they should not assemble together out of the said town, and should not come to a Fair that should be holden at Wilnale on Trinity Sunday, then next following.
And the inhabitants of Walsall the same day kept at home.
Notwithstanding, came one from Hampton, whose name is William Milner, calling himself the Abbot of Marram, and one Walter Leveson with him, with the inhabitants of Hampton to the number of four score persons in harness [armour] after the manner of war, to Wilnall to the said Fair. And also one Robert Marchall, of Wednesbury, calling himself Robyn Hood, and Sir Richard Foxe, priest, with divers other persons to the number of 100 men and above, in harness, came in likewise, and met with the said other rioters at the said town of Wilnall, and then and there riotously assembled themselves, commanding openly that if any of the town of Walsall came therefrom, to strike them down, and in the said town continued their said riotous assembly all the same day; and if any man of Walsall at that day had been seen at that Fair, they should have been in jeopardy of their lives.
Please your highness to grant your Letters of Privy Seal to be directed to the said John Beamonde, Walter Leveson, Sir Richard Foxe, priest, and Roger Marchall, to commanding them to appear before your Council to answer to the premises.
1st July, in the 13th year, to appear.
[Endorsed].
Three several letters issued to Walter Leveson, Richard Foxe, and Roger Marchall, to appear.
MICHAELMAS TERM IN THE 14TH YEAR. THE MAYOR AND INHABITANTS OF WALSALL AGAINST JOHN BEAMONDE, ESQUIRE, AND OTHERS. ANSWER FOR SIR ROGER MARCHALL--
The Bill is only "feyned a yenst hym in pure males" [malice] for his great trouble and vexation, and loss of his goods. He did not riotously assemble with any persons in arms, nor is he guilty of any riot. As for the coming to the said Fair at Wylnahale "hit hath byn of olde tymes used and accustumed in the said Fere day that with the inhabitants of sede townes of Hampton, Wednesbury, and Walsall have comyne to the said Fere with the capitanns called the Abot of Marham or Robyn Hodys, to the intent to gether money with their disportes to the profight of the chirches of the said lordshipes," whereby great profit hath grown to the said churches in times past.
Whereupon the said Roger Marchall and his Company at the special desire of the Inhabitants of Weddesbury, come in peaceable manner to the said Fair, according to the said old custom, and these met with one John Walker, of Walsall, and divers others of the said town, and then and there "they make as gud chere unto them as they should do to ther lovying neyburs." And he denies that they came riotously.
THE ANSWER OF WALTER LEVESON--
He heard say at Hampton, where he dwells, that
Comments (0)