Unconscious Memory(Fiscle Part-3) by Samuel Butler (classic books to read .TXT) π
Time The "Origin Of Species" Was Published In 1859.
There Are Few Things Which Strike Us With More Surprise, When We
Review The Course Taken By Opinion In The Last Century, Than The
Suddenness With Which Belief In Witchcraft And Demoniacal Possession
Came To An End.
Read free book Β«Unconscious Memory(Fiscle Part-3) by Samuel Butler (classic books to read .TXT) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Samuel Butler
Read book online Β«Unconscious Memory(Fiscle Part-3) by Samuel Butler (classic books to read .TXT) πΒ». Author - Samuel Butler
Each Man Of Them Is Entirely Independent, Acknowledging No
Constituted Authority, But That Some Among Them Exercise A Tacit And
Undefined Influence Over The Others. Let Us Suppose These Molecules
Capable Of Memory, Both In Their Capacity As Individuals, And As
Societies, And Able To Transmit Their Memories To Their Descendants,
From The Traditions Of The Dimmest Past To The Experiences Of Their
Own Lifetime. Some Of These Societies Will Remain Simple, As Having
Had No History, But To The Greater Number Unfamiliar, And Therefore
Striking, Incidents Will From Time To Time Occur, Which, When They Do
Not Disturb Memory So Greatly As To Kill, Will Leave Their Impression
Upon It. The Body Or Society Will Remember These Incidents, And Be
Modified By Them In Its Conduct, And Therefore More Or Less In Its
Internal Arrangements, Which Will Tend Inevitably To Specialisation.
This Memory Of The Most Striking Events Of Varied Lifetimes I
Maintain, With Professor Hering, To Be The Differentiating Cause,
Which, Accumulated In Countless Generations, Has Led Up From The
Amoeba To Man. If There Had Been No Such Memory, The Amoeba Of One
Generation Would Have Exactly Resembled Time Amoeba Of The Preceding,
And A Perfect Cycle Would Have Been Established; The Modifying
Effects Of An Additional Memory In Each Generation Have Made The
Cycle Into A Spiral, And Into A Spiral Whose Eccentricity, In The
Outset Hardly Perceptible, Is Becoming Greater And Greater With
Increasing Longevity And More Complex Social And Mechanical
Inventions.
We Say That The Chicken Grows The Horny Tip To Its Beak With Which It
Ultimately Pecks Its Way Out Of Its Shell, Because It Remembers
Having Grown It Before, And The Use It Made Of It. We Say That It
Made It On The Same Principles As A Man Makes A Spade Or A Hammer,
That Is To Say, As The Joint Result Both Of Desire And Experience.
When I Say Experience, I Mean Experience Not Only Of What Will Be
Chapter 13 (Conclusion) Pg 139Wanted, But Also Of The Details Of All The Means That Must Be Taken
In Order To Effect This. Memory, Therefore, Is Supposed To Guide The
Chicken Not Only In Respect Of The Main Design, But In Respect Also
Of Every Atomic Action, So To Speak, Which Goes To Make Up The
Execution Of This Design. It Is Not Only The Suggestion Of A Plan
Which Is Due To Memory, But, As Professor Hering Has So Well Said, It
Is The Binding Power Of Memory Which Alone Renders Any Consolidation
Or Coherence Of Action Possible, Inasmuch As Without This No Action
Could Have Parts Subordinate One To Another, Yet Bearing Upon A
Common End; No Part Of An Action, Great Or Small, Could Have
Reference To Any Other Part, Much Less To A Combination Of All The
Parts; Nothing, In Fact, But Ultimate Atoms Of Actions Could Ever
Happen--These Bearing The Same Relation To Such An Action, We Will
Say, As A Railway Journey From London To Edinburgh As A Single
Molecule Of Hydrogen To A Gallon Of Water. If Asked How It Is That
The Chicken Shows No Sign Of Consciousness Concerning This Design,
Nor Yet Of The Steps It Is Taking To Carry It Out, We Reply That Such
Unconsciousness Is Usual In All Cases Where An Action, And The Design
Which Prompts It, Have Been Repeated Exceedingly Often. If, Again,
We Are Asked How We Account For The Regularity With Which Each Step
Is Taken In Its Due Order, We Answer That This Too Is Characteristic
Of Actions That Are Done Habitually--They Being Very Rarely Misplaced
In Respect Of Any Part.
When I Wrote "Life And Habit," I Had Arrived At The Conclusion That
Memory Was The Most Essential Characteristic Of Life, And Went So Far
As To Say, "Life Is That Property Of Matter Whereby It Can Remember--
Matter Which Can Remember Is Living." I Should Perhaps Have Written,
"Life Is The Being Possessed Of A Memory--The Life Of A Thing At Any
Moment Is The Memories Which At That Moment It Retains"; And I Would
Modify The Words That Immediately Follow, Namely, "Matter Which
Cannot Remember Is Dead"; For They Imply That There Is Such A Thing
As Matter Which Cannot Remember Anything At All, And This On Fuller
Consideration I Do Not Believe To Be The Case; I Can Conceive Of No
Matter Which Is Not Able To Remember A Little, And Which Is Not
Living In Respect Of What It Can Remember. I Do Not See How Action
Of Any Kind Is Conceivable Without The Supposition That Every Atom
Retains A Memory Of Certain Antecedents. I Cannot, However, At This
Point, Enter Upon The Reasons Which Have Compelled Me To This
Conclusion. Whether These Would Be Deemed Sufficient Or No, At Any
Rate We Cannot Believe That A System Of Self-Reproducing Associations
Should Develop From The Simplicity Of The Amoeba To The Complexity Of
The Human Body Without The Presence Of That Memory Which Can Alone
Account At Once For The Resemblances And The Differences Between
Successive Generations, For The Arising And The Accumulation Of
Divergences--For The Tendency To Differ And The Tendency Not To
Differ.
At Parting, Therefore, I Would Recommend The Reader To See Every Atom
In The Universe As Living And Able To Feel And To Remember, But In A
Humble Way. He Must Have Life Eternal, As Well As Matter Eternal;
And The Life And The Matter Must Be Joined Together Inseparably As
Body And Soul To One Another. Thus He Will See God Everywhere, Not
As Those Who Repeat Phrases Conventionally, But As People Who Would
Chapter 13 (Conclusion) Pg 140Have Their Words Taken According To Their Most Natural And Legitimate
Meaning; And He Will Feel That The Main Difference Between Him And
Many Of Those Who Oppose Him Lies In The Fact That Whereas Both He
And They Use The Same Language, His Opponents Only Half Mean What
They Say, While He Means It Entirely.
The Attempt To Get A Higher Form Of A Life From A Lower One Is In
Accordance With Our Observation And Experience. It Is Therefore
Proper To Be Believed. The Attempt To Get It From That Which Has
Absolutely No Life Is Like Trying To Get Something Out Of Nothing.
The Millionth Part Of A Farthing Put Out To Interest At Ten Per Cent,
Will In Five Hundred Years Become Over A Million Pounds, And So Long
As We Have Any Millionth Of A Millionth Of The Farthing To Start
With, Our Getting As Many Million Pounds As We Have A Fancy For Is
Only A Question Of Time, But Without The Initial Millionth Of A
Millionth Of A Millionth Part, We Shall Get No Increment Whatever. A
Little Leaven Will Leaven The Whole Lump, But There Must Be Some
Leaven.
I Will Here Quote Two Passages From An Article Already Quoted From On
Page 55 Of This Book. They Run:-
"We Are Growing Conscious That Our Earnest And Most Determined
Efforts To Make Motion Produce Sensation And Volition Have Proved A
Failure, And Now We Want To Rest A Little In The Opposite, Much Less
Laborious Conjecture, And Allow Any Kind Of Motion To Start Into
Existence, Or At Least To Receive Its Specific Direction From
Psychical Sources; Sensation And Volition Being For The Purpose
Quietly Insinuated Into The Constitution Of The Ultimately Moving
Particles." {177a}
And:-
"In This Light It Can Remain No Longer Surprising That We Actually
Find Motility And Sensibility So Intimately Interblended In Nature."
{177b}
We Should Endeavour To See The So-Called Inorganic As Living, In
Chapter 13 (Conclusion) Pg 141Respect Of The Qualities It Has In Common With The Organic, Rather
Than The Organic As Non-Living In Respect Of The Qualities It Has In
Common With The Inorganic. True, It Would Be Hard To Place One's
Self On The Same Moral Platform As A Stone, But This Is Not
Necessary; It Is Enough That We Should Feel The Stone To Have A Moral
Platform Of Its Own, Though That Platform Embraces Little More Than A
Profound Respect For The Laws Of Gravitation, Chemical Affinity, &C.
As For The Difficulty Of Conceiving A Body As Living That Has Not Got
A Reproductive System--We Should Remember That Neuter Insects Are
Living But Are Believed To Have No Reproductive System. Again, We
Should Bear In Mind That Mere Assimilation Involves All The
Essentials Of Reproduction, And That Both Air And Water Possess This
Power In A Very High Degree. The Essence Of A Reproductive System,
Then, Is Found Low Down In The Scheme Of Nature.
At Present Our Leading Men Of Science Are In This Difficulty; On The
One Hand Their Experiments And Their Theories Alike Teach Them That
Spontaneous Generation Ought Not To Be Accepted; On The Other, They
Must Have An Origin For The Life Of The Living Forms, Which, By Their
Own Theory, Have Been Evolved, And They Can At Present Get This
Origin In No Other Way Than By The Deus Ex Machina Method, Which They
Reject As Unproved, Or A Spontaneous Generation Of Living From Non-
Living Matter, Which Is No Less Foreign To Their Experience. As A
General Rule, They Prefer The Latter Alternative. So Professor
Tyndall, In His Celebrated Article (Nineteenth Century, November
1878), Wrote:-
"It Is Generally Conceded (And Seems To Be A Necessary Inference From
The Lessons Of Science) That Spontaneous Generation Must At One Time
Have Taken Place" (Italics Mine).
No Inference Can Well Be More Unnecessary Or Unscientific. I Suppose
Spontaneous Generation Ceases To Be Objectionable If It Was "Only A
Very Little One," And Came Off A Long Time Ago In A Foreign Country.
The Proper Inference Is, That There Is A Low Kind Of Livingness In
Every Atom Of Matter. Life Eternal Is As Inevitable A Conclusion As
Matter Eternal.
It Should Not Be Doubted That Wherever There Is Vibration Or Motion
There Is Life And Memory, And That There Is Vibration And Motion At
All Times In All Things.
The Reader Who Takes The Above Position Will Find That He Can Explain
The Entry Of What He Calls Death Among What He Calls The Living,
Whereas He Could By No Means Introduce Life Into His System If He
Started Without It. Death Is Deducible; Life Is Not Deducible.
Death Is A Change Of Memories; It Is Not The Destruction Of All
Memory. It Is As The Liquidation Of One Company, Each Member Of
Which Will Presently Join A New One, And Retain A Trifle Even Of The
Old Cancelled Memory, By Way Of Greater Aptitude For Working In
Concert With
Comments (0)