The Diary by Samuel Pepys (children's ebooks online TXT) π
Description
Pepysβ Diary is an incredibly frank decade-long snapshot of the life of an up and coming naval administrator in mid-17th century London. In it he describes everything from battles against the Dutch and the intrigues of court, down to the plays he saw, his marital infidelities, and the quality of the meat provided for his supper. His observations have proved invaluable in establishing an accurate record of the daily life of the people of London of that period.
Pepys eventually stopped writing his diary due to progressively worse eyesight, a condition he feared. He did consider employing an amanuensis to transcribe future entries for him, but worried that the content he wanted written would be too personal. Luckily for Pepys, his eyesight difficulties never progressed to blindness and he was able to go on to become both a Member of Parliament and the President of the Royal Society.
After Pepysβ death he left his large library of books and manuscripts first to his nephew, which was then passed on to Magdalene College, Cambridge, where it survives to this day. The diary, originally written in a shorthand, was included in this trove and was eventually deciphered in the early 19th century, and published by Lord Baybrooke in 1825. This early release censored large amounts of the text, and it was only in the 1970s that an uncensored version was published. Presented here is the 1893 edition, which restores the majority of the originally censored content but omits βa few passages which cannot possibly be printed.β The rich collection of endnotes serve to further illustrate the lives of the people Pepys meets and the state of Englandβs internal politics and international relations at the time.
Read free book Β«The Diary by Samuel Pepys (children's ebooks online TXT) πΒ» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Samuel Pepys
Read book online Β«The Diary by Samuel Pepys (children's ebooks online TXT) πΒ». Author - Samuel Pepys
Sir Peter Lely (1618β ββ 1680) was knighted January 11th, 1678β ββ 79. His house was in Drury Lane. He died November 30th, 1680, and was buried by torchlight in St. Paulβs Church, Covent Garden, December 7th. β©
See March 2nd, 1666β ββ 67. β©
D.C.L., Kingβs Advocate, 1669; Judge of the High Court of Admiralty in 1673, in succession to Sir Leoline Jenkins. β©
Sir Leoline Jenkins, Principal of Jesus College, Oxford, and afterwards made Judge of the Admiralty and the Prerogative Court. He was subsequently employed on several embassies, and succeeded Henry Coventry as Secretary of State, 1680. Died 1685, aged sixty-two. His State Papers have been published. Burnet says of him, βHe was a man of an exemplary life and considerably learned, but he was dull and slow; he was suspected of leaning to popery, though very unjustly.β β©
Margaret, daughter of Sir Thomas Lucas, of Colchester, and sister to John, Lord Lucas, married William Cavendish, Marquis of Newcastle, created Duke of Newcastle, 1665. The play was written by the husband, and not by the wife. β©
Betty Hall. See January 23rd, 1666β ββ 67. β©
See February 14th, 1666β ββ 67. β©
Lady Elizabeth Howard, daughter of Theophilus Howard, second Earl of Suffolk, wife of Algernon, tenth Earl of Northumberland. ββ B. β©
Lady Elizabeth Wriothesley, third and youngest daughter to the last Earl of Southampton, half-sister to Rachel, Lady Russell, married to Josceline, Lord Percy, who succeeded as eleventh Earl of Northumberland in 1668. She was mother of Lady Elizabeth Percy, afterwards Duchess of Somerset. β©
Evelyn (Diary, July 29th, 1667) says that it was owing to Sir William Coventry that no fleet was fitted out in 1667. His unpopularity after the burning of the fleet at Chatham by the Dutch was great. βThose who advised His Majesty to prepare no fleet this spring, deservedβ βI know whatβ βbut!β (Evelynβs Diary, June 28th, 1667). ββ B. β©
If this is not a mistake it infers that there was some relationship between Sir Thomas Allen and Captain John Allen, the father of Rebecca. β©
Henry Jowles, of Chatham, was married to Rebecca, daughter of John Alleyn of the same place, in 1662 (see Chesterβs London Marriage Licences, ed. Foster, col. 779). The name is given incorrectly as Jewkes in note 2024. β©
Little? β©
John Lanyon, one of the contractors for victualling Tangier. β©
Nathanael Crewe, afterwards Bishop of Durham, and last Lord Crewe (1633β ββ 1722). He was the founder of the noble Bamborough charities. At this time he was thirty-four years of age. β©
The Bear at the Bridge Foot was a famous tavern in Southwark (see note 681). β©
To Cobham Hall, near Gravesend. See April 26th, post. ββ B. β©
See note 2860. β©
Son of the Earl of Berkshire. β©
See November 1st, 1667, post. β©
The passage between brackets is written in the margin of the MS. β©
The practice of giving alms on Maundy Thursday to poor men and women equal in number to the years of the sovereignβs age is a curious survival in an altered form of an old custom. The original custom was for the king to wash the feet of twelve poor persons, and to give them a supper in imitation of Christβs last supper and his washing of the Apostlesβ feet. James II was the last sovereign to perform the ceremony in person, but it was performed by deputy so late as 1731. The Archbishop of York was the kingβs deputy on that occasion. The institution has passed through the various stages of feet washing with a supper, the discontinuance of the feet washing, the substitution of a gift of provisions for the supper, and finally the substitution of a gift of money for the provisions. The ceremony took place at the Chapel Royal, Whitehall; but it is now held at Westminster Abbey. Maundy is derived from the Latin word maudatum, which commences the original anthem sung during the ceremony, in reference to Christβs command; but Spelman supposed it to be connected with the maunds or baskets to contain the giftsβ βas will be seen from what has been said of the original institution, this is an impossible explanation. Professor Skeat has settled the question conclusively by proving beyond doubt that Maundy is really the French mandΓ©, which is the regular phonetic forin of Latin mandatum, a command (see his Etymological Dictionary and note to βPiers Plowman,β E. E. Text Soc. edition, part iv, p. 379). He points out that Spelmanβs guess about maund, a basket, βis as false as it is readily believed.β β©
Thomas Wentworth, fourth Baron Wentworth of Nettlestead, advanced, February 7th, 1625β ββ 26, to the earldom of Cleveland. In 1660
Comments (0)