Table-Talk by William Hazlitt (best pdf reader for ebooks txt) ๐
Description
William Hazlitt was a well-regarded critic and essayist in his day, and Table-Talk, a collection of some of his more popular short essays, is perhaps his best-remembered work.
The essays themselves range in subject from philosophy, to art, to literature, culture, society, and politics, with titles like โOn the Pleasures of Paintingโ and โOn Corporate Bodies.โ Hazlittโs intimate style and deep familiarity with many different aspects of art culture (not only was he a literary success, but he studied under Joshua Reynolds to be a portrait painter) make his essays fascinating multi-disciplinary reads.
Table-Talk was originally published in two separate volumes, and, largely due to Hazlittโs political activism, was received poorly by his contemporaries. Today itโs considered one of his masterpieces.
Read free book ยซTable-Talk by William Hazlitt (best pdf reader for ebooks txt) ๐ยป - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: William Hazlitt
Read book online ยซTable-Talk by William Hazlitt (best pdf reader for ebooks txt) ๐ยป. Author - William Hazlitt
It is certain that there is nothing in the idea of a preexistent state that excites our longing like the prospect of a posthumous existence. We are satisfied to have begun life when we did; we have no ambition to have set out on our journey sooner; and feel that we have had quite enough to do to battle our way through since. We cannot say,
โThe wars we well remember of King Nine,
Of old Assaracus and Inachus divine.โ
Neither have we any wish: we are contented to read of them in story, and to stand and gaze at the vast sea of time that separates us from them. It was early days then: the world was not well-aired enough for us: we have no inclination to have been up and stirring. We do not consider the six thousand years of the world before we were born as so much time lost to us: we are perfectly indifferent about the matter. We do not grieve and lament that we did not happen to be in time to see the grand mask and pageant of human life going on in all that period; though we are mortified at being obliged to quit our stand before the rest of the procession passes.
It may be suggested in explanation of this difference, that we know from various records and traditions what happened in the time of Queen Anne, or even in the reigns of the Assyrian monarchs, but that we have no means of ascertaining what is to happen hereafter but by awaiting the event, and that our eagerness and curiosity are sharpened in proportion as we are in the dark about it. This is not at all the case; for at that rate we should be constantly wishing to make a voyage of discovery to Greenland or to the Moon, neither of which we have, in general, the least desire to do. Neither, in truth, have we any particular solicitude to pry into the secrets of futurity, but as a pretext for prolonging our own existence. It is not so much that we care to be alive a hundred or a thousand years hence, any more than to have been alive a hundred or a thousand years ago: but the thing lies here, that we would all of us wish the present moment to last forever. We would be as we are, and would have the world remain just as it is, to please us.
โThe present eye catches the present objectโ โโ
to have and to hold while it may; and abhors, on any terms, to have it torn from us, and nothing left in its room. It is the pang of parting, the unloosing our grasp, the breaking asunder some strong tie, the leaving some cherished purpose unfulfilled, that creates the repugnance to go, and โmakes calamity of so long life,โ as it often is.
โO! thou strong heart!
Thereโs such a covenant โtwixt the world and thee
Theyโre loth to break!โ
The love of life, then, is an habitual attachment, not an abstract principle. Simply to be does not โcontent manโs natural desireโ: we long to be in a certain time, place, and circumstance. We would much rather be now, โon this bank and shoal of time,โ than have our choice of any future period, than take a slice of fifty or sixty years out of the Millennium, for instance. This shows that our attachment is not confined either to being or to well-being; but that we have an inveterate prejudice in favour of our immediate existence, such
Comments (0)