American library books ยป Other ยป The Problems of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell (best novels of all time txt) ๐Ÿ“•

Read book online ยซThe Problems of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell (best novels of all time txt) ๐Ÿ“•ยป.   Author   -   Bertrand Russell



1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 44
Go to page:
of before and after in time. Suppose I hear a chime of bells: when the last bell of the chime sounds, I can retain the whole chime before my mind, and I can perceive that the earlier bells came before the later ones. Also in memory I perceive that what I am remembering came before the present time. From either of these sources I can abstract the universal relation of before and after, just as I abstracted the universal relation โ€œbeing to the left of.โ€ Thus time-relations, like space-relations, are among those with which we are acquainted.

Another relation with which we become acquainted in much the same way is resemblance. If I see simultaneously two shades of green, I can see that they resemble each other; if I also see a shade of red: at the same time, I can see that the two greens have more resemblance to each other than either has to the red. In this way I become acquainted with the universal โ€œresemblanceโ€ or โ€œsimilarity.โ€

Between universals, as between particulars, there are relations of which we may be immediately aware. We have just seen that we can perceive that the resemblance between two shades of green is greater than the resemblance between a shade of red and a shade of green. Here we are dealing with a relation, namely โ€œgreater than,โ€ between two relations. Our knowledge of such relations, though it requires more power of abstraction than is required for perceiving the qualities of sense-data, appears to be equally immediate, and (at least in some cases) equally indubitable. Thus there is immediate knowledge concerning universals as well as concerning sense-data.

Returning now to the problem of a priori knowledge, which we left unsolved when we began the consideration of universals, we find ourselves in a position to deal with it in a much more satisfactory manner than was possible before. Let us revert to the proposition โ€œtwo and two are four.โ€ It is fairly obvious, in view of what has been said, that this proposition states a relation between the universal โ€œtwoโ€ and the universal โ€œfour.โ€ This suggests a proposition which we shall now endeavour to establish: namely, โ€œAll a priori knowledge deals exclusively with the relations of universals.โ€ This proposition is of great importance, and goes a long way towards solving our previous difficulties concerning a priori knowledge.

The only case in which it might seem, at first sight, as if our proposition were untrue, is the case in which an a priori proposition states that all of one class of particulars belong to some other class, or (what comes to the same thing) that all particulars having some one property also have some other. In this case it might seem as though we were dealing with the particulars that have the property rather than with the property. The proposition โ€œtwo and two are fourโ€ is really a case in point, for this may be stated in the form โ€œany two and any other two are four,โ€ or โ€œany collection formed of two twos is a collection of four.โ€ If we can show that such statements as this really deal only with universals, our proposition may be regarded as proved.

One way of discovering what a proposition deals with is to ask ourselves what words we must understandโ โ€”in other words, what objects we must be acquainted withโ โ€”in order to see what the proposition means. As soon as we see what the proposition means, even if we do not yet know whether it is true or false, it is evident that we must have acquaintance with whatever is really dealt with by the proposition. By applying this test, it appears that many propositions which might seem to be concerned with particulars are really concerned only with universals. In the special case of โ€œtwo and two are four,โ€ even when we interpret it as meaning โ€œany collection formed of two twos is a collection of four,โ€ it is plain that we can understand the proposition, i.e. we can see what it is that it asserts, as soon as we know what is meant by โ€œcollectionโ€ and โ€œtwoโ€ and โ€œfour.โ€ It is quite unnecessary to know all the couples in the world: if it were necessary, obviously we could never understand the proposition, since the couples are infinitely numerous and therefore cannot all be known to us. Thus although our general statement implies statements about particular couples, โ€œas soon as we know that there are such particular couples,โ€ yet it does not itself assert or imply that there are such particular couples, and thus fails to make any statement whatever about any actual particular couple. The statement made is about โ€œcouple,โ€ the universal, and not about this or that couple.

Thus the statement โ€œtwo and two are fourโ€ deals exclusively with universals, and therefore may be known by anybody who is acquainted with the universals concerned and can perceive the relation between them which the statement asserts. It must be taken as a fact, discovered by reflecting upon our knowledge, that we have the power of sometimes perceiving such relations between universals, and therefore of sometimes knowing general a priori propositions such as those of arithmetic and logic. The thing that seemed mysterious, when we formerly considered such knowledge, was that it seemed to anticipate and control experience. This, however, we can now see to have been an error. No fact concerning anything capable of being experienced can be known independently of experience. We know a priori that two things and two other things together make four things, but we do not know a priori that if Brown and Jones are two, and Robinson and Smith are two, then Brown and Jones and Robinson and Smith are four. The reason is that this proposition cannot be understood at all unless we know that there are such people as Brown and Jones and Robinson and Smith, and this we

1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 44
Go to page:

Free e-book: ยซThe Problems of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell (best novels of all time txt) ๐Ÿ“•ยป   -   read online now on website american library books (americanlibrarybooks.com)

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet. You can be the first!
Add a comment