Sixteen Experimental Investigations from the Harvard Psychological Laboratory by Hugo Münsterberg (100 books to read .txt) 📕
[5] Dodge, Raymond, PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1900, VII., p. 456.
[6] Graefe, A., Archiv f. Ophthalmologie, 1895, XLI., 3, S. 136.
This explanation of Graefe is not to be admitted, however, since in the case of eye-movement there are muscular sensations of one's own activity, which are not present when one merely sits in a coach. These sensations of eye-movement are in all cases so intimately connected with our perception of the movement of objects, that they may not be in this case simpl
Read free book «Sixteen Experimental Investigations from the Harvard Psychological Laboratory by Hugo Münsterberg (100 books to read .txt) 📕» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Hugo Münsterberg
- Performer: -
Read book online «Sixteen Experimental Investigations from the Harvard Psychological Laboratory by Hugo Münsterberg (100 books to read .txt) 📕». Author - Hugo Münsterberg
Project Gutenberg’s Harvard Psychological Studies, Volume 1, by Various
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: Harvard Psychological Studies, Volume 1
Containing Sixteen Experimental Investigations from the
Harvard Psychological Laboratory.
Author: Various
Editor: Hugo Münsterberg
Release Date: July 12, 2005 [EBook #16266]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDIES, VOL 1 ***
Produced by Gallica (http://gallica.bnf.fr/), Clare Boothby,
Victoria Woosley and the Online Distributed Proofreading
Team at http://www.pgdp.net.
THE
Psychological Review
EDITED BY
J. McKEEN CATTELL and J. MARK BALDWIN
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
WITH THE CO-OPERATION OF
ALFRED BINET, ÉCOLE DES HAUTES-ÉTUDES, PARIS;
JOHN DEWEY, H.H. DONALDSON, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO;
G.S. FULLERTON, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA;
G.H. HOWISON, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
JOSEPH JASTROW, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN;
G.T. LADD, YALE UNIVERSITY;
HUGO MÜNSTERBERG, HARVARD UNIVERSITY;
M. ALLEN STARR, COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, NEW YORK;
CARL STUMPF, UNIVERSITY, BERLIN;
JAMES SULLY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON.
H.C. WARREN, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, Associate Editor and Business Manager.
*
Series of Monograph Supplements,
Vol. IV., No. 1 (Whole No. 17), January, 1903.
HARVARD PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDIES,
Volume I CONTAININGSixteen Experimental Investigations from the
Harvard Psychological Laboratory.
EDITED BY
HUGO MÜNSTERBERG.
PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY,
41 N. QUEEN ST., LANCASTER, PA.
66 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK.
AGENT: G.E. STECHERT, LONDON (2 Star Yard, Cary St., W.C.)
Leipzig (Hospital St., 10); PARIS (76 rue de Rennes).
PRESS OF
THE NEW ERA PRINTING COMPANY
LANCASTER, PA.
*
PREFACE.
The appearance of the HARVARD PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDIES does not indicate
an internal change in the work of the Harvard Psychological
Laboratory. But while up to this time the results of our
investigations have been scattered in various places, and have often
remained unpublished through lack of space, henceforth, we hope to
have in these STUDIES the opportunity to publish the researches of the
Harvard Laboratory more fully and in one place. Only contributions
from members of the Harvard Psychological Laboratory will be printed
in these volumes, which will appear at irregular intervals, and the
contributions will represent only our experimental work;
non-experimental papers will form an exception, as with the present
volume, wherein only the last one of the sixteen papers belongs to
theoretical psychology.
This first volume does not give account of all sides of our laboratory
work. An essential part of the investigations every year has been the
study of the active processes, such as attention, apperception, and
volition. During the last year several papers from these fields have
been completed, but we were unable to include them in this volume on
account of the space limits; they are kept back for the second volume,
in which accordingly the essays on the active functions will prevail,
as those on perception, memory, and feeling prevail in this volume. It
is thus clear that we aim to extend our experimental work over the
whole field of psychology and to avoid one-sideness. Nevertheless
there is no absence of unity in our work; it is not scattered work as
might appear at a first glance; for while the choice of subjects is
always made with relation to the special interests of the students,
there is after all one central interest which unifies the work and has
influenced the development of the whole laboratory during the years of
my direction.
I have always believed—a view I have fully discussed in my ‘Grundzüge
der Psychologie’—that of the two great contending theories of modern
psychology, neither the association theory nor the apperception theory
is a satisfactory expression of facts, and that a synthesis of both
which combines the advantages without the defects of either can be
attained as soon as a psychophysical theory is developed which shall
consider the central process in its dependence, not only upon the
sensory, but also upon the motor excitement. This I call the _action
theory_. In the service of this theory it is essential to study more
fully the rôle of the centrifugal processes in mental life, and,
although perhaps no single paper of this first volume appears to offer
a direct discussion of this motor problem, it was my interest in this
most general question which controlled the selection of all the
particular problems.
This relation to the central problem of the rôle of centrifugal
processes involves hardly any limitation as to the subject matter;
plenty of problems offer themselves in almost every chapter of
psychology, since no mental function is without relation to the
centrifugal actions. Yet, it is unavoidable that certain groups of
questions should predominate for a while. This volume indicates, for
instance, that the æsthetic processes have attracted our attention in
an especially high degree. But even if we abstract from their
important relation to the motor functions, we have good reasons for
turning to them, as the æsthetic feelings are of all feeling processes
decidedly those which can be produced in the laboratory most purely;
their disinterested character makes them more satisfactory for
experimental study than any other feelings.
Another group of researches which predominates in our laboratory is
that on comparative psychology. Three rooms of the laboratory are
reserved for psychological experiments on animals, under the special
charge of Dr. Yerkes. The work is strictly psychological, not
vivisectional; and it is our special purpose to bring animal
psychology more in contact with those methods which have found their
development in the laboratories for human psychology. The use of the
reaction-time method for the study of the frog, as described in the
fifteenth paper, may stand as a typical illustration of our aim.
All the work of this volume has been done by well-trained
post-graduate students, and, above all, such advanced students were
not only the experimenters but also the only subjects. It is the rule
of the laboratory that everyone who carries on a special research has
to be a subject in several other investigations. The reporting
experimenters take the responsibility for the theoretical views which
they express. While I have proposed the subjects and methods for all
the investigations, and while I can take the responsibility for the
experiments which were carried on under my daily supervision, I have
left fullest freedom to the authors in the expression of their views.
My own views and my own conclusions from the experiments would not
seldom be in contradiction with theirs, as the authors are sometimes
also in contradiction with one another; but while I, of course, have
taken part in frequent discussions during the work, in the completed
papers my rôle has been merely that of editor, and I have nowhere
added further comments.
In this work of editing I am under great obligation to Dr. Holt, the
assistant of the laboratory, for his helpful coöperation.
*
CONTENTS.
Preface: Hugo Münsterberg ……………………………….. i
STUDIES IN PERCEPTION.
Eye-Movement and Central Anæsthesia: Edwin B. Holt ……….. 3
Tactual Illusions: Charles H. Rieber ……………………. 47
Tactual Time Estimation: Knight Dunlap ………………….. 101
Perception of Number through Touch: J. Franklin Messenger …. 123
The Subjective Horizon: Robert MacDougall ……………….. 145
The Illusion of Resolution-Stripes on the Color-Wheel:
Edwin B. Holt ………………………………………. 167
STUDIES IN MEMORY.
Recall of Words, Objects and Movements: Harvey A. Peterson … 207
Mutual Inhibition of Memory Images: Frederick Meakin ……… 235
Control of the Memory Image: Charles S. Moore ……………. 277
STUDIES IN ÆSTHETIC PROCESSES.
The Structure of Simple Rhythm Forms: Robert MacDougall …… 309
Rhythm and Rhyme: R.H. Stetson …………………………. 413
Studies in Symmetry: Ethel D. Puffer ……………………. 467
The Æsthetics of Unequal Division: Rosewell Parker Angier …. 541
STUDIES IN ANIMAL PSYCHOLOGY.
Habit Formation in the Crawfish, Camburus affinis: Robert
M. Yerkes and Gurry E. Huggins ……………………….. 565
The Instincts, Habits and Reactions of the Frog: Robert
Mearns Yerkes ………………………………………. 579
STUDIES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY.
The Position of Psychology in the System of Knowledge:
Hugo Münsterberg ……………………………………. 641
PLATES.
OPPOSITE PAGE
Plate I ………………………………………………. 20
” II ………………………………………………. 24
” III ………………………………………………. 28
” IV ………………………………………………. 34
” V ………………………………………………. 190
” VI ………………………………………………. 198
” VII ………………………………………………. 200
” VIII ………………………………………………. 314
” IX ………………………………………………. 417
” X ………………………………………………. 436
Charts of the Sciences, at end of volume.
*
STUDIES IN PERCEPTION.
*
EYE-MOVEMENT AND CENTRAL ANÆSTHESIA.
BY EDWIN B. HOLT.
I. THE PROBLEM OF ANÆSTHESIA DURING EYE-MOVEMENT.
A first suggestion of the possible presence of anæsthesia during
eye-movement is given by a very simple observation. All near objects
seen from a fairly rapidly moving car appear fused. No further
suggestion of their various contour is distinguishable than blurred
streaks of color arranged parallel, in a hazy stream which flows
rapidly past toward the rear of the train. Whereas if the eye is kept
constantly moving from object to object scarcely a suggestion of this
blurred appearance can be detected. The phenomenon is striking, since,
if the eye moves in the same direction as the train, it is certain
that the images on the retina succeed one another even more rapidly
than when the eye is at rest. A supposition which occurs to one at
once as a possible explanation is that perchance during eye-movement
the retinal stimulations do not affect consciousness.
On the other hand, if one fixates a fly which happens to be crawling
across the window-pane and follows its movements continuously, the
objects outside swim past as confusedly as ever, and the image of the
fly remains always distinct. Here the eye is moving, and it may be
rapidly, yet both the fly and the blurred landscape testify to a
thorough awareness of the retinal stimulations. There seems to be no
anæsthesia here. It may be, however, that the eye-movement which
follows a moving object is different from that which strikes out
independently across the visual field; and while in the former case
there is no anæsthesia, perhaps in the latter case there is
anæsthesia.
Cattell,[1] in considering a similar experience, gives his opinion
that not the absence of fusion for the moving eye, but its presence
for the resting eye, needs explanation. “More than a thousand
interruptions per second,” he believes, “give a series of sharply
defined retinal processes.” But as for the fusion of moving objects
seen when the eyes are at rest, Cattell says, “It is not necessary and
would probably be disadvantageous for us to see the separate phases.”
Even where distinct vision would be ‘disadvantageous’ he half doubts
if fusion comes to the rescue, or if even the color-wheel ever
produces complete fusion. “I have never been able,” he writes, “to
make gray in a color-wheel from red and green (with the necessary
correction of blue), but when it is as nearly gray as it can be got I
see both red and green with an appearance of translucence.”
[1] Cattell, J. McK., PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1900, VII., p. 325.
That the retina can hold apart more than one thousand
Comments (0)