Sixteen Experimental Investigations from the Harvard Psychological Laboratory by Hugo Münsterberg (100 books to read .txt) 📕
[5] Dodge, Raymond, PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1900, VII., p. 456.
[6] Graefe, A., Archiv f. Ophthalmologie, 1895, XLI., 3, S. 136.
This explanation of Graefe is not to be admitted, however, since in the case of eye-movement there are muscular sensations of one's own activity, which are not present when one merely sits in a coach. These sensations of eye-movement are in all cases so intimately connected with our perception of the movement of objects, that they may not be in this case simpl
Read free book «Sixteen Experimental Investigations from the Harvard Psychological Laboratory by Hugo Münsterberg (100 books to read .txt) 📕» - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Hugo Münsterberg
- Performer: -
Read book online «Sixteen Experimental Investigations from the Harvard Psychological Laboratory by Hugo Münsterberg (100 books to read .txt) 📕». Author - Hugo Münsterberg
themselves, who confessed to an expectation that the white would
assert itself as affectively in ideation as in perception. But it is
not improbable that affective or æsthetic elements contributed to the
result, which shows as high a figure as 25 seconds for the gray as
against 29 for the white. One subject indeed (IV.) found the gray
restful, and gives accordingly an individual average of 32 for the
gray as against 27 for the white. More than one subject, in fact,
records a slight advantage in favor of the gray. And if we must admit
the possibility of a subjective interest, it seems not unlikely that a
bald blank space, constituting one extreme of the white-black series,
should be poorer in suggestion and perhaps more fatiguing than
intermediate members lying nearer to the general tone of the ordinary
visual field. Probably the true function of the brightness quality in
favoring ideation would be better shown by a comparison of different
grays. The general average shows, it is true, a decided preponderance
in favor of the white, but the individual variations prove it would be
unsafe to conclude directly, without experimental test, from the laws
of perception to the laws of ideation.
Series No. V.—The fifth series, which was suggested by the second,
presents the problem of the lines in greater simplicity than the
second; and, unlike the earlier series, it shows in all the individual
averages the same sort of preponderance as is shown in the general
average (straight line, 31; broken line, 38). The footings of the
columns, moreover, show an aggregate in favor of the broken line in
the case of every pair of lines that were exposed together. The
results in this case may therefore be regarded as cleaner and more
satisfactory than those reached before, and come nearer, one may say,
to the expression of a general law. The theoretical interpretation,
however, would be in both cases the same.
[Illustration: FIG. 5.]
TABLE V.
1 2 3 4 5 6
L A L A L A L A L A L A
I. 28 26.5 24.5 29.5 25 28 26 28.5 26 29.5 25.5 29.5
II. 35 41.5 42 34.5 31.5 47.5 53 50.5 52 52 48 48
III. 16.5 19.5 24 29 41 29.5 35.5 29 21 40 39 40
IV. 40 41.5 37 45 32.5 45.5 36.5 43.5 33.5 38 36.5 43.5
V. 49 53 45 47 45.5 36.5 32.5 51 37 46 40 51
VI. 18 31.5 16 45 22.5 30.5 25 25 24.5 37 25 22
VII. 43 39.5 52 54.5 52.5 53.5 51 54.5 40.5 55 48 48.5
VIII. 23 23 27 29.5 38 40 34.5 32 23 37 42 38.5
IX. 23 48 48 47.5 35 46.5 48 35 28.5 48 46.5 34.5
X. 18 33 19.5 31.5 20.5 30 22 29.5 16.5 35.5 19.5 33
XI. 22.5 33.5 18 41 26 23 19 35.5 5 38 7 50.5
316 390.5 353 434 370 410.5 383 414 307.5 456 377 439
Averages.
L A
I. 25.83 28.58
II. 43.58 45.66
III. 29.50 31.16
IV. 36.00 42.83
V. 41.50 47.41
VI. 21.83 31.83
VII. 47.83 50.91
VIII. 31.25 33.33
IX. 38.16 43.25
X. 19.33 32.08
XI. 16.25 36.91
31.91 38.54
L: Line (straight line). A: Angle (broken line).
General average: L, 31.91 sec.; A, 38.54 sec.
TABLE VI.
1 2 3 4 5 6
P M P M P M P M P M P M
I. 22 32.5 23.5 32 23.5 32 22.5 32.5 23.5 31.5 21 39
II. 24.5 32.5 31.5 49.5 32 39 36 36 33.5 42 28.5 35
III. 8.5 23.5 0 36 0 31.5 11.5 5.5 8.5 14 3.5 8.5
IV. 30 49.5 30.5 42 24 48 27.5 44 28 40.5 43.5 34.5
V. 55.5 55.5 54.5 54.5 46.5 53 34 36 41.5 47 31 35.5
VI. 19.5 22.5 19.5 28 19.5 28.5 26.5 27.5 24.5 29.5 18.5 36
VII. 45 56.5 47.5 55.5 40.5 40 48 54 33.5 50 41 42.5
VIII. 19.5 24 0 40 27.5 20.5 13.5 23 16 25 23 34.5
IX. 28 49.5 26.5 48.5 27.5 45 18 45 21.5 48.5 42.5 44.5
X. 8 43.5 22 29 8.5 43.5 9.5 42.5 16 35 12.5 40.5
XI. 5.5 42.5 7.5 35.5 16.5 35.5 7.5 41 10 41.5 8 32.5
24.18 39.27 23.91 40.95 24.18 37.86 23.14 35.18 23.32 36.77 24.82 34.82
Indiv. Aver.
P M
I. 22.666 33.250
II. 31.000 39.000
III. 5.333 19.833
IV. 30.583 43.083
V. 43.833 46.916
VI. 21.333 28.666
VII. 42.583 49.750
VIII. 16.583 27.833
IX. 27.333 46.833
X. 12.750 39.000
XI. 9.166 38.083
23.92 37.48
P: Plain. M: Marked.
General average: Plain, 23.92 sec.; Marked, 37.48 sec.
Series No. VI._—Both the figures in each pair of this series were of
the same material (granite-gray cardboard) and of the same area and
outline, but the content of one of the two was varied with dark lines
for the most part concentric with the periphery.
The advantage on the side of the figures with a varied content is
marked, the general averages showing a greater difference than is
shown in any of the tables so far considered. And the advantage
appears on the same side both in the individual averages and in the
averages for the different pairs as shown at the foot of the columns.
There can be little doubt, accordingly, that we have here the
expression of a general law.
For the meaning of this law we may consult the notes of the subjects:
‘The plain figure became a mere amorphous mass;’ ‘the inner lines
reinforce the shape, for while previously the number of points in this
star has increased (in ideation), here the number is fixed, and fixed
correctly;’ ‘my attention traversed the lines of the content, and
seemed to be held by them;’ ‘the variety of the marked objects was
felt as more interesting;’ ‘the attention was more active when
considering the marked figures, passing from point to point of the
figure;’ ‘the surface of the plain figure was attended to as a whole
or mass, without conscious activity;’ ‘in the plain figure I thought
of the gray, in the marked figure I thought of the lines;’ ‘part of
the plain figure tended to have lines.’
The part played by the motor elements previously referred to in
sustaining attention and prolonging (internal) sensation is here
unmistakable. We have further evidence, too, of the value of the line
in defining and strengthening the mental attitude. In a mass of
homogeneous elements such as is presented by a uniform gray surface,
the attention is equally engaged by all and definitely held by none.
Monotony therefore means dullness. And the inhibition of incompatible
attitudes being as weak and uncertain as the attitudes actually but
loosely assumed, the latter are readily displaced, and the sensation
to which they correspond as readily disappears. Hence the greater
interest excited by the lined figures. The lines give definiteness and
direction to the attention, and as definitely inhibit incompatible
attitudes. And the shutting out of the latter by the spontaneous
activity of the mind means that it is absorbed or interested in its
present occupation.
TABLE VII.
1 2 3 4 5 6
5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10
I. 29.5 23 24.5 21.5 27 18.5 28 26 27 20 25 29.5
II. 25.5 21 32.5 42.5 19.5 33 27 33.5 26 32 20 28.5
III. 4.5 18.5 12.5 5.5 0 3.5 7.5 11 10.5 18.5 0 7
IV. 33 31.5 28 32 42 44 25 45 38.5 43 41 36.5
V. 35 40.5 35 52.5 28 49.5 43 31 42.5 29 47.5 50.5
VI. 10.5 34.5 10.5 34.5 23 15 26 26.5 22 27 19.5 34.5
VII. 27 42 28.5 19 31.5 49 39 45.5 28.5 50.5 49.5 51.5
VIII. 13.5 21.5 19 15 21.5 18 23 22.5 19.5 18 24.5 21.5
IX. 33 43.5 36 37.5 35 40 26 45 31.5 44 21.5 43.5
X. 20.5 23 22.5 23 23 23.5 22 27.5 21.5 29 21 34.5
XI. 13.5 29 32 16.5 9.5 36.5 40.5 8.5 39.5 8.5 17.5 30.5
22.32 31.50 25.55 27.23 23.64 30.05 27.91 29.27 27.91 29.05 26.09 33.45
7 8 9 10 11 12
5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10
I. 22.5 29 27.5 25.5 26 22 22.5 27.5 25.5 25 22 28
II. 29 37.5 32.5 28 34 32 26 23 30.5 28 25.5 23
III. 20.5 8.5 12 16.5 21 9 32 3 21.5 15 8 22
IV. 31 26 39.5 41.5 37 29.5 28.5 37 36.5 30.5 33 31.5
V. 38 34 39 46.5 54 40 32.5 46 43.5 46 36.5 50.5
VI. 30 17 13 25 34.5 26.5 20.5 27 27 35 27.5 33
VII. 55.5 50 42.5 28 50.5 15.5 49 17.5 43.5 29.5 44 26.5
VIII. 16.5 21.5 18 17 17.5 21.5 21 22.5 21.5 23.5 23 27.5
IX. 41 46 45.5 43.5 46.5 33 39 37.5 32 35 33.5 40
X. 24.5 28.5 26.5 24 28.5 25.5 25.5 25 22 30 24 23.5
XI. 19.5 26.5 14 30 42.5 2.5 21.5 30 22.5 33 25.5 24
29.82 29.50 28.18 29.59 35.64 23.36 28.91 26.91 29.64 30.05 27.50 29.96
Indiv. Aver.
5 10
I. 25.58 24.62
II. 27.33 30.16
III. 12.50 11.50
IV. 34.41 35.66
V. 39.54 43.00
VI. 22.00 27.95
VII. 40.75 35.37
VIII. 19.87 20.83
IX. 35.04 40.70
X. 23.45 26.41
XI. 24.83 22.95
27.75 29.15
5: refers to object exposed 5 seconds.
10: refers to object exposed 10 seconds.
General average: (5), 27.75 sec.; (10), 29.15 sec.
Series No. VII.—The object of this series was to determine the
effect in ideation of exposing for unequal lengths of time the two
objects compared. The figures compared were of the same area and
outline, and were distinguished only by their color, one being red and
the other green. These colors were employed, after a preliminary test,
as showing, on the whole, to nearly equal advantage in the individual
choice of colors. The shorter exposure was five seconds and the longer
exposure ten seconds. The color that was to be seen the longer time
was exposed first alone; after five seconds the other was exposed; and
then both were seen for five seconds together, so that neither might
have the advantage of the more recent impression. The two colors were
regularly alternated, and in one half of the series the longer
exposure was to the right, in the other half to the left. The extra
five seconds were thus in each case at the beginning of the
experiment.
The general averages show only a slight advantage in favor of the
color which was exposed the longer time, namely, 29.15 seconds, as
against 27.75 seconds. It is not easy to believe that the advantage of
sole occupancy of the visual field for five seconds, without any
offsetting disadvantage in the next five seconds, should have so
slight an effect on the course of ideation. And it is not improbable
that there was an offsetting disadvantage. In the presence of color
the subject can scarcely remain in the attitude of quiet curiosity
which it is easy to maintain in the observation of colorless objects.
A positive interest is excited. And the appearance of a new color in
the field when there is another color there already seems to be
capable of exciting, by a sort of successive contrast different from
that ordinarily described, an interest which is the stronger from the
fact that the subject has already been interested in a different
color. That is to say, the transition from color to color (only red
and green were employed) seems
Comments (0)