The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky (i love reading books .txt) ๐
Description
Dmitri Karamazov and his father Fyodor are at war over both Dmitriโs inheritance and the affections of the beautiful Grushenka. Into this feud arrive the middle brother Ivan, recently returned from Moscow, and the youngest sibling Alyosha, who has been released into the wider world from the local monastery by the elder monk Zossima. Through a series of accidents of fate and wilful misunderstandings the Karamazovs edge closer to tragedy, while the local townspeople watch on.
The Brothers Karamazov was Fyodor Dostoevskyโs final novel, and was originally serialised in The Russian Messenger before being published as a complete novel in 1880. This edition is the well-received 1912 English translation by Constance Garnett. As well as earning wide-spread critical acclaim, the novel has been widely influential in literary and philosophical circles; Franz Kafka and James Joyce admired the emotions that verge on madness in the Karamazovs, while Sigmund Freud and Jean-Paul Satre found inspiration in the themes of patricide and existentialism.
Read free book ยซThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky (i love reading books .txt) ๐ยป - read online or download for free at americanlibrarybooks.com
- Author: Fyodor Dostoevsky
Read book online ยซThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky (i love reading books .txt) ๐ยป. Author - Fyodor Dostoevsky
โThat is, in brief,โ Father Paรฏssy began again, laying stress on each word, โaccording to certain theories only too clearly formulated in the nineteenth century, the Church ought to be transformed into the State, as though this would be an advance from a lower to a higher form, so as to disappear into it, making way for science, for the spirit of the age, and civilization. And if the Church resists and is unwilling, some corner will be set apart for her in the State, and even that under controlโ โand this will be so everywhere in all modern European countries. But Russian hopes and conceptions demand not that the Church should pass as from a lower into a higher type into the State, but, on the contrary, that the State should end by being worthy to become only the Church and nothing else. So be it! So be it!โ
โWell, I confess youโve reassured me somewhat,โ Miรผsov said smiling, again crossing his legs. โSo far as I understand, then, the realization of such an ideal is infinitely remote, at the second coming of Christ. Thatโs as you please. Itโs a beautiful Utopian dream of the abolition of war, diplomacy, banks, and so onโ โsomething after the fashion of socialism, indeed. But I imagined that it was all meant seriously, and that the Church might be now going to try criminals, and sentence them to beating, prison, and even death.โ
โBut if there were none but the ecclesiastical court, the Church would not even now sentence a criminal to prison or to death. Crime and the way of regarding it would inevitably change, not all at once of course, but fairly soon,โ Ivan replied calmly, without flinching.
โAre you serious?โ Miรผsov glanced keenly at him.
โIf everything became the Church, the Church would exclude all the criminal and disobedient, and would not cut off their heads,โ Ivan went on. โI ask you, what would become of the excluded? He would be cut off then not only from men, as now, but from Christ. By his crime he would have transgressed not only against men but against the Church of Christ. This is so even now, of course, strictly speaking, but it is not clearly enunciated, and very, very often the criminal of today compromises with his conscience: โI steal,โ he says, โbut I donโt go against the Church. Iโm not an enemy of Christ.โ Thatโs what the criminal of today is continually saying to himself, but when the Church takes the place of the State it will be difficult for him, in opposition to the Church all over the world, to say: โAll men are mistaken, all in error, all mankind are the false Church. I, a thief and murderer, am the only true Christian Church.โ It will be very difficult to say this to himself; it requires a rare combination of unusual circumstances. Now, on the other side, take the Churchโs own view of crime: is it not bound to renounce the present almost pagan attitude, and to change from a mechanical cutting off of its tainted member for the preservation of society, as at present, into completely and honestly adopting the idea of the regeneration of the man, of his reformation and salvation?โ
โWhat do you mean? I fail to understand again,โ Miรผsov interrupted. โSome sort of dream again. Something shapeless and even incomprehensible. What is excommunication? What sort of exclusion? I suspect you are simply amusing yourself, Ivan Fyodorovitch.โ
โYes, but you know, in reality it is so now,โ said the elder suddenly, and all turned to him at once. โIf it were not for the Church of Christ there would be nothing to restrain the criminal from evildoing, no real chastisement for it afterwards; none, that is, but the mechanical punishment spoken of just now, which in the majority of cases only embitters the heart; and not the real punishment, the only effectual one, the only deterrent and softening one, which lies in the recognition of sin by conscience.โ
โHow is that, may one inquire?โ asked Miรผsov, with lively curiosity.
โWhy,โ began the elder, โall these sentences to exile with hard labor, and formerly with flogging also, reform no one, and whatโs more, deter hardly a single criminal, and the number of crimes does not diminish but is continually on the increase. You must admit that. Consequently the security of society is not preserved, for, although the obnoxious member is mechanically cut off and sent far away out of sight, another criminal always comes to take his place at once, and often two of them. If anything does preserve society, even in our time, and does regenerate and transform the criminal, it is only the law of Christ speaking in his conscience. It is only by recognizing his wrongdoing as a son of a Christian societyโ โthat is, of the Churchโ โthat he recognizes his sin against societyโ โthat is, against the Church. So that it is only against the Church, and not against the State, that the criminal of today can recognize that he has sinned. If society, as a Church, had jurisdiction, then it would know when to bring back from exclusion and to reunite to itself. Now the Church having no real jurisdiction, but only the power of moral condemnation, withdraws of her own accord from punishing the criminal actively. She does not excommunicate him but simply persists in motherly exhortation of him. What is more, the Church even tries
Comments (0)